Objective: To examine college students’ illicit use of prescription stimulant medications and compliance-gaining strategies that they would use to obtain a stimulant medication.
Design: A questionnaire-based study.
Setting: Seven hundred and twenty undergraduate college students at a large, northeastern university in the United States were surveyed.
Method: The study received approval from the university’s Institutional Review Board (IRB). Students completed anonymous questionnaires outside of class time.
Results: Respondents were more likely to use rationality and promise strategies to gain others’ compliance. No differences in strategy selection for close friends and acquaintances were reported. Illicit prescription stimulant users scored higher in sensation seeking than those who reported no prior illicit stimulant use.
Conclusions: A compliance-gaining perspective provided a better understanding of the strategies college students are likely to use to obtain prescription stimulants from those with a legitimate prescription.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Misuse of prescription drugs: data from the 2002, 2003, and 2004 national surveys on drug use and health. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, 2005. http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/prescription/toc.htm (accessed 5 July 2007).
2.
CodyMJCanaryDJSmithSW. Compliance-gaining goals: an inductive analysis of actors’ goal types, strategies, and successes. In: DalyJAWiemannJM (eds) Strategic interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994: 33–90.
3.
Center for Disease Control’s National Center for Health Statistics. Stimulants and antidepressants: school-age children. Hyattsville, MD: Center for Disease Control: 2006. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus04.pdf (accessed 5 July 2007).
4.
ButterfieldS. More teens are on drugs – the legal kind. American College of Physicians Observer, 2007: 27: 1.
5.
HallKIrwinMBowmanKFrankenbergerWJewettD. Illicit use of prescribed stimulant medication among college students. J Am Coll Health, 2005: 53: 167–74.
6.
TeterCJMcCabeSECranfordJABoydCJGuthrieSK. Prevalence and motives for illicit use of prescription stimulants in undergraduate student sample. J Am Coll Health, 2005: 53: 253–62.
7.
WhitePBBecker-BleaseKAGrace-BishopG. Stimulant medication use, misuse, and abuse in an undergraduate and graduate student sample. J Am Coll Health, 2006: 54: 261–6.
8.
McCarthyM. Prescription drug use up sharply in the USA. Lancet, 2007: 369: 1505–6.
9.
HechtMLMarsigliaFFElekEWagstaffDAKulisSDustmanPMiller-DayM. Culturally grounded substance use prevention: an evaluation of the keepin’ it R. E. A. L. curriculum. Prev Sci, 2003: 4: 233–48.
10.
MarwellGSchmidtDR. Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: an empirical analysis. Sociometry, 1967: 30: 350–64.
11.
DillardJPAndersonJWKnoblochLK. Interpersonal influence. In: KnappMLDalyJA (eds) Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002: 425–74.
12.
WilsonSR. Seeking and resisting compliance: why people say what they do when trying to influence others. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
13.
CodyMJCanaryDJSmithSW. Compliance-gaining goals: an inductive analysis of actors’ goal types, strategies, and successes. In: DalyJAWiemannJM (eds) Strategic interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994: 33–90.
14.
KellermanK. A goal directed approach to gaining compliance: relating differences among goals to differences in behavior. Communication Research, 2004: 31: 397–445.
15.
WilsonSRAlemanCGLeathamGB. Identity implications of influence goals: a revised analysis of face-threatening acts and application to seeking compliance with same-sex friends. Human Communication Research, 1998: 26: 64–96.
16.
BabcockQByrneT. Student perceptions of methylphenidate abuse at a public liberal arts college. J Am Coll Health, 2000: 49: 143–5.
17.
TeterCJMcCabeSELaGrangeKCranfordJABoydCJ. Illicit use of specific prescription stimulants among college students: prevalence, motives, and routes of administration. Pharmacotherapy, 2006: 26: 1501–10.
18.
InfanteDAWigleyCJ. Verbal aggressiveness: an interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 1986: 53: 61–69.
19.
BosterFJLevineT. Individual differences and compliance gaining message selection: the effects of verbal aggressiveness, argumentativeness, dogmatism, and negativism. Communication Research Report, 1988: 5: 114–19.
20.
GrahamKSchmidtGGillisK. Circumstances when drinking leads to aggression: an overview of research findings. Contemporary Drug Problems, 1996: 23: 493–557.
21.
GreeneKKrcmarM. Predicting exposure to and liking of media violence: a uses and gratifications approach. Communication Studies, 2005: 56: 71–93.
22.
AtkinCKSmithSWRobertoAJFediukTWagnerT. Correlates of verbally aggressive communication in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 2002: 12: 1305–13.
23.
BuksteinOG. Aggression, violence, and substance abuse in adolescents. Adolescent Substance Abuse and Dual Disorders, 1996: 5: 93–109.
24.
MeyerJR. Effect of verbal aggressiveness on the perceived importance of secondary goals in messages. Communication Studies, 2004: 55: 168–84.
25.
ZukermanM. Sensation seeking: beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1979.
26.
HoyleRHFejfarMCMillerJD. Personality and sexual risk taking: a quantitative review. Journal of Personality, 2000: 68: 1204–31.
27.
LonczakHSNeighborsCDonovanDM. Predicting risky and angry driving as a function of gender. Accid Anal Prev, 2007: 39: 536–45.
28.
YanovitzkyI. Sensation seeking and alcohol use by college students: examining multiple pathways of effects. J Health Commun, 2005: 11: 269–80.
29.
YanovitzkyI. Sensation seeking and adolescent drug use: the mediating role of association with deviant peers and pro-drug discussions. Health Commun, 2006: 17: 67–89.
30.
TrostMRLanganEJKellar-GuentherY. Not everyone listens when you “just say no”: drug resistance in relational context. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 1999: 27: 120–38.
31.
CanaryDJCodyMJMarstonPJ. Goal types, compliance-gaining and locus of control. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1987: 5: 249–69.
32.
HoyleRHStephensonMTPalmgreenPLorchEPDonohewRL. Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 2002: 32: 401–14.
33.
BrownPLevinsonSC. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
34.
Graff LowKGendaszekA. Illicit use of psychostimulants among college students: a preliminary study. Psychol Health Medicine, 2002: 7: 283–7.
35.
LedermanLCStewartLP. Changing the culture of college drinking: a socially situated health communication campaign. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2005.
