Educators tend to look to theories for ideas on how to educate gifted children. Theories are, however, not value-neutral explanations, but complex attempts to serve human goals that contain values and ideas for action, as well as explanations. When there is a disjunction between a theory and ideas about what is good for gifted children, the latter should be our guide. The most important value in gifted education, we argue, should be child-centeredness. Theories can serve this value by helping us to understand the perspective of a gifted child. Most models and theories (Maslow's and Dabrowski's being the primary exceptions) address the conditions that promote gifted achievement and do not illuminate the inner life of gifted children. And yet, the pressure to achieve often has negative consequences for the emotional well-being, of the childs. Roeper's education for self-actualization and interdependence offers an approach to gifted education that respects the inner life of gifted children and assists the mine finding their own Way in life.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
2.
Betts, G. T. (1991). The autonomous learner model for gifted and talented. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 142-153). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
Bloom, B. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
4.
Boorstelman, L. J. (1983). Children before psychology: Ideas about children from antiquity to the late 1800s. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1. History, theory and methods (pp. 1-40). New York: Wiley.
5.
Borland, J. H. (1990a). Post positivist inquiry: Implications of the “New Philosophy of Science” for the field of the education of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 161-167.
6.
Borland, J. H. (1990b). An equal among firsts: Leta Hollingworth's contributions to the psychology and education of the gifted. Roeper Review, 12, 162-166.
7.
Cohen, L. (1988). To get ahead, get a theory. Roeper Review, 11, 95-100.
8.
Cohen, L., & Ambrose, D. (1993). Theories and practices for differentiated education for the gifted and talented. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 339-363). Oxford: Pergamon.
9.
Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. A. (Eds.). (1996). Handbook of gifted education. (2nd ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
Coleman, L., Sanders, M., & Cross, T. (1997). Perennial debates and tacit assumptions in the education of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 105-111.
11.
Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12.
Feldman, D. H. (1982). A developmental framework for research with gifted children. In D. H. Feldman (Ed.), Developmental approaches to giftedness and creativity (pp. 21-45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Feldman, D. H. (1997, August). Developmental theory and the expression of talent. Paper presented at the 12th World Conference of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children, Seattle, WA.
14.
Feldman, D. H., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1986). Nature's gambit. New York: Basic Books.
15.
Gagné, F. (1995). From giftedness to talent: A developmental model and its impact on the language of the field. Roeper Review, 18, 103-1 11.
16.
Grant, B. A. (1988). Four voices: Life history studies of moral development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
17.
Grant, B. A. (1990). Moral development: Theories and lives. Advanced Development, 2, 85-91.
18.
Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Exceptionally gifted children. New York: Routledge.
19.
Hanson, N. (1970). A picture theory of theory meaning. In Colodny, R. (Ed.), The nature and function of scientific theories (pp. 233-274). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
20.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World.
21.
Horowitz, F. D. (1991). Thinking about development, developmental processes, and the gifted and talented. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent Development. The 1991 Henry B. Wallace and Jocelyn B. Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. (pp. 31-41). Unionville, NY: Trillium.
22.
Kaufmann, F. A. (1992). What educators can learn from gifted adults. In F. Mönks & W. Peters (Eds.), Talent for the future (pp. 37-44). The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
23.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Louganis, G. (1995). Breaking the surface. New York: Random House.
25.
Miller, A. (1981). Prisoners of childhood. New York: Basic Books.
26.
Margolin, L. (1994). Goodness personified: The emergence of gifted children. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
27.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.) New York: Harper & Row.
28.
Morelock, M. J. (1995). The profoundly gifted child in family context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tufts University, Medford, MA.
29.
Morelock, M. J. (in press). The child of extraordinarily high IQ from a Vygotskian perspective. In R. C. Friedman & B. Shore (Eds.), Talents within: Cognitive and developmental aspects. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30.
Nelson, K. C. (1989). Dabrowski's theory of positive disintegration. Advanced Development, 1, 1-14.
31.
Peterson, J. S. (1997a). Bright, tough, and resilient—and not in a gifted program. Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, 8, 121-136.
32.
Peterson, J. S. (1997b, November). Sixteen at-risk gifted young adults after high school: A longitudinal study of four areas of development. Paper presented at the National Association for Gifted Children Annual Convention, Little Rock, AR.
33.
Piechowski, M. M. (1978). Self-actualization as a developmental structure: A profile of Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 97, 181-242.
34.
Piechowski, M. M. (1986). The concept of developmental potential. Roeper Review, 9, 190-197.
35.
Piechowski, M. M. (1991). Emotional development and emotional giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 285-306). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36.
Piechowski, M. M. (1997, August). Emotional giftedness: An expanded view. Paper presented at the 12th World Conference of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children, Seattle, WA.
37.
Piirto, J. (1992). Understanding those who create. Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
38.
Rimm, S. B. (1997). Underachievement syndrome: A national epidemic. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (2nd ed., pp. 416-434). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
39.
Roeper, A. (1990). Educating children for life: The modern learning community. Monroe, NY: Trillium.
40.
Roeper, A. (1996). Selected writings and speeches. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
41.
Rorty, R. (1982). Method, social science, and social hope. In R. Rorty, Consequences of pragmatism (pp. 191-210). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
Sanborn, M. P. (1979). Counseling and guidance needs of the gifted. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and the talented: Their education and development (pp. 424-438). The 78th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
43.
Shore, B. M. (1987). Metacognition, intelligence, and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 37-39.
44.
Silverman, L. K. (1990). Social and emotional development of the gifted: The discoveries of Leta Hollingworth. Roeper Review, 12, 171-178.
45.
Silverman, L. K. (1993). The gifted individual. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted and talented (pp. 3-28). Denver: Love.
46.
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1986). Conceptions of giftedness: A map of the terrain. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 3-18). New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Tannenbaum, A. (1997). The meaning and making of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 27-42). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
48.
Ward, V. S. (1961). Educating the gifted: An axiomatic approach. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
49.
Waterman, A. S. (1984). The psychology of individualism. New York: Praeger.
50.
Whitmore. J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
