To investigate previous claims that close association among gifted children provides them with the intellectual stimulation and socioaffective support they need, 32 eighth grade students (18 males and 14 females), divided according to their educational program placement, were observed working on various tasks in either homogeneous or heterogeneous ability groups. Homogeneously congregated gifted children in a self-contained program exchanged constructive types of knowledge and prosocial feedback significantly more frequently than either homogeneously grouped nonidentified students or heterogeneously mixed gifted and nonidentified youth. Gifted children within the mixed group tended to congregate among themselves; they varied widely in the frequency and nature of their interactions with nonidentified group mates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armstrong, D.C. (1987). Appropriate education for the gifted in America: An echo of earlier words. Journal for theEducation of Gifted , 12, 277-292.
2.
Azmitia, M. (1988). Peer interaction and problem-solving: When are two heads better than one?Child Development, 59, 87-96.
3.
Baldauf, R.S. (1959). A comparison of the extent of educational growth of mentally advanced pupils in the Cedar Rapids experiment. Journal of Educational Research, 52, 181-183.
4.
Blanning, J.M. (1977). Gifted adolescents in an urban independent study program. In J.M. Blanning (Ed.), Ideas for urban/rural gifted/talented: Case histories and program plans (pp. 1-66). Ventura, CA: Office of the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools for the National/State Leadership Training Institute for the Gifted and Talented. [17, *57, 91, Intro.]
5.
Bracey, G.W. (1987). The social impact of ability grouping. Phi Delta Kappan,68, 701-702.
6.
Callahan, C.M. (1985). Science. In R.H. Swassing (Ed.) Teaching gifted children and adolescents (pp. 276-313). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
7.
Clark, B. (1988). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
8.
Dar, Y., & Resh, N. (1986). Classroom intellectual composition and academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 357-374.
9.
Dishart, M. (1983). Psychosocial facilitators, enhancers, and inhibitors of gifted children. In B. M. Shore, F. Gagne, S. Larivee, R. H. Tali, & R. E. Tremblay (Eds.), Face to face with giftedness (pp. 27-38). New York: Trillium.
10.
Donald, J.G. (1983). Knowledge structures: Methods for exploring course content. Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 31-41.
11.
Dunn, R., & Griggs, S. (1985). Teaching and counseling gifted students with their learning preferences. Two case studies. GiftedChild Today , 41, 40-43.
12.
Enzmann, A.M. (1983). A comparison of academic achievement of gifted students enrolled in regular and separate curriculums. Gifted Child Quarterly, 7, 176-179.
13.
Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8),4-10.
14.
Gartner, .A., Kohler, M., & Riessman, F.( 1972). Children teach children. New York : Harper & Row.
15.
Horowitz, F.D., & O'Brien, M. (Eds.). (1985). The gifted and the talented: Developmental perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
Keating, D.P. (1991). Curriculum options for the developmentally advanced: A developmental alternative to gifted education. Exceptionality Education Canada, 1(1), 53-83.
17.
Keating, D.P.,& Matthews, D. (1990, March). Domain specificity and generality of higher order thinking. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Adolescence, Atlanta .
18.
Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C.L. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta- analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research, 19, 415-428.
19.
Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C.C. (1991). Ability grouping and gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook ofgifted education (pp. 178-196). Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Maddux, C.D., Scheiber, L.M., & Bass, J.E. (1982). Self -concept and social distance in gifted children . Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 77-81.
22.
Marland, S.P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: A report to the Congress of the United States of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
23.
Monks, F.H., van Boxtel, H.W., Roelofs, J.J.W., & Sanders, M.P.M. (1986). The identification of gifted children in secondary education and a description of their situation in Holland . In K.A. Heller & J.F. Feldhusen (Eds.), Identifying and nurturing the gifted: An international perspective (pp.39-65). Toronto: Hans Huber.
24.
Perkins, D.N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound ?Educational Researcher, 18, 16-25.
25.
Phelps, E. & Damon, W. (1989). Problem solving with equals: Peer collaboration as a context for learning mathematics and spatial concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 639-646.
26.
Rabinowitz, M., & Glaser, R. (1985). Cognitive structure and cognitive processes in highly competent performance. In F.D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp.75-98). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27.
Renzulli, J.S. (1977). The Enrichment Triad Model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
28.
Rogers, K. (1993). Grouping the gifted and talented: Questions and answers. Roeper Review, 16, 8-12.
29.
Schneider, B.H. (1987). The gifted child in peer group perspective. New York: Springer.
30.
Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1984). How gifted students learn: Implications from recent research. Roeper Review, 6, 183-185.
31.
Seiger, S.D. (1984). Reaching beyond thinking skills to thinking strategies for the academically gifted. Roeper Review, 6, 185-188.
32.
Shore, B.M. (1986). Cognition and giftedness: New research directions . Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 24- 27.
33.
Shore, B.M., Cornell, D.G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V.S. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University. Shore, B.M., & Dover, A.C. (1987). Metacognition, intelligence and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly , 31, 37-39.
34.
Slavin, R.E. (1988). Synthesis of research on grouping in elementary and secondary schools. Educational Leadership, 46(1), 67-76. Stemberg, R.J., & Davidson, J.E. (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row.
36.
Ward, V.S. (1980). Differential education for the gifted. Ventura, CA: Office of the Ventura County Superintendent of Education for the National/State Leadership Training Institute for the Gifted and Talented.
37.
Wolf, J.S., & Stephens, T.M. (1985). Social and emotional development of gifted children and youth. In R.H. Swassing (Ed.), Teaching gifted children and adolescents (pp. 60-91). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
38.
Woodliffe, H.M. (1977). Teaching gifted learners: A handbook for teachers . Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
