This paper critically reviews the concept of multipotentiality as it has been defined and encountered in the scientific literature on gifted children. Until recently, it has not been adequately subjected to empirical evaluation. Despite its ubiquitous presence in the literature, several pieces of evidence are presented suggesting that multipotentiality has been erroneously interpreted and falsely assumed to apply to a majority of intellectually gifted individuals. Findings are summarized from a recent report (Achter, Lubinski, & Benbow, 1996) on the ability, interest, and value profiles of over 1000 students from the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY), as well as evidence compiled from other empirical studies, indicating that above-level assessment of abilities and preferences among gifted adolescents reveal markedly differentiated profiles for the vast majority (over 95% when all factors were consulted). Thus, the concept of multipotentiality requires rethinking. Traditional assessment tools found in vocational psychology (i.e., questionnaires and tests measuring abilities, interests, and values), when offered in an above-level format, are useful in serving the educational and career counseling needs of intellectually gifted young adolescents. Further, such tools are helpful for gaining an appreciation of the diversity of individual differences among the intellectually talented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achter, J.A., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (1996). Multipotentiality among the intellectually gifted: It was never there and already it's vanishing. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 65-76,
2.
Allport, G.W., Vernon, P.E., & Lindzey, G. (1970). Manual: Study of Values. Cambridge : Houghton Mifflin.
3.
American College Testing. (1993). ACT high school profile: National report. Iowa City, IA : Author.
4.
Austin, J.T., & Hanisch, K.A. (1990). Occupational attainment as a function of abilities and interests: A longitudinal analysis using Project Talent data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 77-86.
5.
Benbow, C.P. (1991). ). Mathematically talented children: Can acceleration meet their educational needs. In N. Colangelo and G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 154-165). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
6.
Benbow, C.P. (1992). Academic achievement in mathematics and science between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability? Journal of Educational Psychology , 84, 51-61.
7.
Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (Eds.). (1996). Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
Benbow, C.P., & Lubinski, D. (1997). Intellectually talented children: How can we best meet their needs? In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.) Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 155-167). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
Benbow, C.P., & Stanley, J.C. ( 1996). Inequity in equity: How current educational equity policies place able students at risk. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 249-293.
10.
Campbell, D.P. (1977). Manual for the SVIB-SCII (2nd edition). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Carroll, J.B. (1989). Intellectual abilities and aptitudes. In A. Lesgold & R. Glasser (Eds.), Foundations for a psychology of education (pp. 137-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Carroll J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Cohn, S.J. (1991). Talent searches. In N. Colangelo and G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 166-177). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
14.
Colangelo, N., & Kerr, B.A. (1990). Extreme academic talent: Profiles of perfect scorers . Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 404-409. Colangelo, N., & Zaffrann, R. T. (Eds.). (1979). New voices in counseling the gifted. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt .
15.
Dawis, R.V. (1991). Vocational interests, values, and preferences . In M. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 25-58). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press.
16.
Dawis, R.V. (1992). The individual differences tradition in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 7-19.
17.
Dawis, R.V., & Lofquist, L.H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
Delisle, J., & Squires, S. (1989). Career development for gifted and talented youth: Position statement Division on Career Development (DCE) and the Association for the Gifted (TAG). Journal for the Education of the Gifted , 13, 97-104.
19.
Emmet, J.D., & Minor, C.W. (1993). Career decision-making factors in gifted young adults. Career Development Quarterly, 41, 350-366.
20.
Feldhusen, J.F., & Jarwan, F.A. (1993). Identification of gifted and talented youth for educational programs. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 233-251). London: Pergamon Press.
21.
Flanagan, J.C., & Cooley, W.W. ( 1966). Project Talent one-year follow-up studies. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
22.
Fox, L.H. (1978). Interest correlates to differential achievement of gifted students in mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1,24-36.
23.
Fredrickson, R.H. (1979). Career development and the gifted. In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 264-276). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
24.
Fredrickson, R.H. (1986). Preparing gifted and talented students for the world of work. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64, 556-557.
25.
Fredrickson, R. H., & Rothney, J. W. M. (Eds.). (1972). Recognizing and assisting multipotential youth. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
26.
French, J.L. (1958). Interests of the gifted. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 7, 14-17.
27.
Hall, A.S., & Kelly, K.R. (1995). Effects of academic achievement, sex, and community of residence on four types of career indecision. The Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 7, 293-302.
28.
Hansen, J.C., & Campbell, D.P. (1985). Manual for the SCII (4th ed.). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
29.
Harmon, L.W., Hansen, J.C., Borgen, F.H., & Hammer, A.L. (1994). Applications and technical guide for the Strong Interest Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
30.
Herr, E.L., & Watanabe, A. (1979). Counseling the gifted about career development . In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 251-263). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/ Hunt.
Hollingworth, L.S. (1926). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillian.
33.
Hollingworth, L.S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ. New York: World Book.
34.
Howley, C.B. (1989). Career education for able students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 205-217.
35.
Humphreys, L.G., & Lubinski, D. (1996). Brief history and psychological significance of assessing spatial visualization. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
36.
Humphreys, L.G., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 250-261.
37.
Jepsen, D.A. (1979). Helping gifted adolescents with career exploration . In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 277-283). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt .
38.
Keating, D.P., & Stanley, J.C. (1972). Extreme measures for the exceptionally gifted in mathematics and science. Educational Researcher, 1, 3-7.
39.
Kelly, K.R., & Hall, A.S. (1994). Effects of academic achievement and gender on occupational aspirations and career interests. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace research symposium (pp. 447-453). Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
40.
Kerr, B.A. (1981). Career education strategies for the gifted. Journal of CareerEducation, 7, 318-324.
Kerr, B.A., & Colangelo, N. (1988). The college plans of academically talented students . Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 42-48.
43.
Kerr, B.A., & Erb, C. (1991). Career counseling with academically talented students: Effects of a value-based intervention. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 309-314.
44.
Kerr, B.A., & Ghrist-Priebe, S.L. (1988). Intervention for multipotentiality: Effects of a career counseling laboratory for gifted high school students . Journal of Counseling and Development, 66, 366-369.
45.
Lofquist, L.H., & Dawis, R.V. (1991). Essentials of person-environment-correspondence counseling. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
46.
Lubinski, D. (1996). Applied individual difference research and its quantitative methods. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law2, 187-203.
47.
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 1, 61-66.
48.
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (1994). The study of mathematically precocious youth: The first three decades of a planned 50-year study of intellectual talent . In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.) Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 255-281). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
49.
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C.P., & Ryan, J. (1995). Stability of vocational interests among the intellectually gifted from adolescence to adulthood: A 15-year longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 196-200.
50.
Lubinski, D.L., Benbow, C.P., & Sanders, C.E. (1993). Reconceptualizing gender differences in achievement among the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.) International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 693-707). London: Pergamon Press.
51.
Lubinski, D., & Dawis, R.V. (1992). Aptitudes, skills, and proficiencies. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), The handbook of industrial/organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1-59). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
52.
Lubinski, D.L., & Humphreys, L.G. (1990). A broadly based analysis of mathematical giftedness. Intelligence, 14, 327-355.
53.
Lubinski, D.L., Schmidt, D.B., & Benbow, C.P. (1996). A 20-year stability analysis of the Study of Values for intellectually gifted individuals from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 443-451.
54.
Marshall, B.C. (1981). Career decision-making patterns of gifted and talented adolescents: Implications for career education. Journal of CareerEducation, 7, 305-310.
55.
Miller, J.V. (1981). Overview of career education for the gifted and talented. Journal of CareerEducation, 7, 266-270.
56.
Milne, B.G. (1979). Career education. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development (pp. 246-254). The seventy-eighth yearbook of the national society for the study of education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
Perrone, P. (1986). Guidance needs of gifted children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64, 564-566. Perrone, P.A., & Van Den Heuvel, D.H. (1981). Career development of the gifted: Horizons unlimited. Journal of Career Education, 7, 299-304.
58.
Rothney, J.W.M. (1972). Longitudinal evidence of multipotentiality. In R. H. Fredrickson & J. W. M. Rothney (Eds.), Recognizing and assisting multipotential youth (pp. 79-89). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
59.
Rothney, J.W.M., & Sanborn, M.P. (1966). Wisconsin's research-through-service program for superior high school students. Personnel and Guidance Journal , 44, 694-699.
60.
Rounds, J.B., & Tracey, T.J. (1990). From trait-and-factor to person-environment fit counseling: Theory and process. In W. B. Walsh and S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Career counseling: Contemporary topics in vocational psychology (pp. 1-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
Rysiew, K.J., Shore, B.M., & Carson, A.D. (1994). Multipotentiality and overchoice syndrome: Clarifying common usage. Gifted and Talented International, 9, 41-46.
62.
Sanborn, M.P. ( 1979a). Career development: Problems of gifted and talented students. In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 284-300). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/ Hunt.
63.
Sanborn, M.P. (1979b). Counseling and guidance needs of the gifted and talented. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development (pp. 424-428). The seventy-eighth yearbook of the national society for the study of education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64.
Schmidt, D.B., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (1996). Vocational preferences among intellectually gifted 13-year olds reflect structural similarities of graduate students in top math/science departments: Uncovering attributes for scientific excellence through cross-validation . Manuscript submitted for publication.
65.
Schroer, A.C.P., & Dorn, F.J. (1986). Enhancing the career and personal development of gifted college students. Journal of Counseling and Development , 64, 567-571.
66.
Silverman, L.K. (1993). Career counseling. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.) Counseling the gifted and talented (pp. 215-238). Denver: Love.
67.
Snow, R.E., & Lohman, D.F. (1989). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 263-331). New York: Collier Macmillan.
68.
Stanley, J.C. (1977). Rationale of the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) during its first five years of promoting educational acceleration . In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George, & C. H. Solano (Eds.), The gifted and the creative (pp. 75-112). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
Stanley, J.C., & Benbow, C.P. (1986). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically . In R. J. Sternberg and J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 361-387). New York: Cambridge University Press.
70.
Terman, L.M. et al. (1925). Genetic studies ofgenius, Vol. 1. Mental and psychological traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
71.
Terman, L.M. (1954). Scientists and nonscientists in a group of 800 gifted men. Psychological Monographs, 68, 1-41.
72.
Thorndike, E.L. (1911). Individuality. Cambridge, MA : Riverside Press.
73.
Tyler, L.E. (1992). Counseling Psychology—Why?Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 342-344.
74.
Williamson, E.G. (1939). How to counsel students. New York: McGraw/Hill.
75.
Williamson, E.G. (1965). Vocational counseling: Some historical, philosophical, and theoretical perspectives. New York: McGraw-Hill.
