The recent popularity of Multiple Intelligences (MI) theory corresponds with current efforts to move away from the use of standardized measures of achievement and ability to more authentic assessment techniques, including portfolio and performance-based assessment. Gardner and his colleagues have strongly encouraged the application of MI theory to performance-based assessment. This study investigates the reliability and validity of a battery of instruments based on MI theory, including teacher checklists and performance-based assessment activities. The purpose in developing the instruments was the identification of talent in culturally diverse and/or low income kindergarten and first grade students. Results suggest acceptable evidence of reliability but raise questions about the validity of the assessments. This study has implications for both future research efforts and the application of MIbased, performance measures to the assessment and identification of talent.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M.L., & Feldman, D.H. (1993). Project Spectrum: A theory-based approach to early education. In R. Pasnak & M. L. Howe (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development. Volume II: Competencies. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2.
Aschbacher, P.R. (1991). Performance assessment: State activity, interest, and concerns. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 275-288.
3.
Ascher, C. (1988). Improving the school-home connection for poor and minority urban students. The Urban Review, 20, 109-123.
4.
Baer, J. (1994). Performance assessments of creativity: Do they have long-term stability?Roeper Review, 17, 7-11.
5.
Baker, E.L., Aschbacher, P.R., Niemi, D., & Sato, E. (1992). CRESST performance assessment models: Assessing content area explanations. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing .
6.
Baker, E.L., O'Neil, H.F., Jr., & Linn, R.L. (1993). Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment. American Psychologist, 48, 1210-1218.
7.
Baldwin, A.Y. (1987). I'm Black but look at me. I am also gifted, Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 180-185.
8.
Baldwin, A.Y. (1994). The seven plus story: Developing hidden talent among students in socioeconomically disadvantaged environments. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 80-84.
9.
Burger, S.E., & Burger, D.L. (1994). Determining the validity of performance-based assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices , 13(1), 9-15.
10.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1967). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. In D. N. Jackson & S. Messick (Eds.), Problems in human assessment (pp. 124-132). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Clasen, D.R., Middleton, J.A., & Connell, T.J. (1994). Assessing artistic and problem solving performance in minority and non-minority students using a nontraditional multidimensional approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 27-32.
12.
Collins, A. (1993). Performance-based assessment of biology teachers: Promises and pitfalls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 30, 1103-1120.
Doran, R.L., Boorman, J., Chan, F., & Hejaily, N. (1993). Alternative assessment of high school laboratory skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1121-1131.
16.
Dunbar, S.B., Koretz, D.M., & Hoover, H.D. (1991). Quality control in the development and use of performance assessments. Applied Measurement in Education , 4, 289-303.
Frechtling, J.A. (1991). Performance assessment: Moonstruck or the real thing?Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(4), 23-25.
19.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Gardner, H. (1984). Assessing intelligences: A comment on 'Testing intelligence without I.Q. tests.' Phi Delta Kappan,65, 699-700.
21.
Gardner, H. (1988). Beyond the IQ: Education and human development . National Forum, 68(2), 4-7.
22.
Gardner, H. (1991). Assessment in context: The alternative to standardized testing. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O'Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction (pp. 77-120). Boston : Kluwer.
23.
Gardner, H. (1993a). In a nutshell. In H. Gardner, Multiple intelligences (pp. 5-12). New York: Basic Books.
24.
Gardner, H. (1993b). Multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books. Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4-9.
25.
Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1990). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences (Technical Report No. 4). New York: Center for Technology in Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 324 366)
26.
Greenwood, C. R. (Guest Ed,), (1994). Technology-based assessment within special education [Special Issue]. Exceptional Children, 61(2).
27.
Guskey, T.R. (1994). What you assess may not he what you get. Educational Leadership, 51(6), 51-54.
28.
Haertel, E.H. (1994). Theoretical and practical considerations. In T. R. Guskey (Ed.), High stakes performance assessment: Perspectives
Hambleton, R.K. (1992). A psychometric perspective on authentic measurement . Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 1-16.
31.
Hatch, T., & Gardner, H. (1990). If Binet had looked beyond the classroom: The assessment of multiple intelligences. International Journal of Educational Research, 14, 415-429.
32.
Herman, J.L., Aschbacher, P.R., & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
33.
Herman, J.L., & Winters, L. (1994). Portfolio research: A slim collection. Educational Leadership, 52(2), 48-55.
34.
High, M.H., & Udall, A.J. (1983). Teacher ratings of students in relation to ethnicity of students and school ethnic balance. Journal for the Education of the Gified, 6, 154-165.
35.
Hills, T.W. (1992). Reaching potentials through appropriate assessment . In S. Bredekamp & T. Rosegrant (Eds.), Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children. Vol. 1 (pp. 43-63). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
36.
King, B. (1991). Teachers' views on performance-based assessments . Teacher Education Quarterly, 18, 109-119.
37.
Kornhaber, M., & Gardner, H. (1993). Varieties of excellence: Identifyivig and assessing children's talents. New York: The National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching.
38.
Krechevsky, M. (1991). Project Spectrum: An innovative assessment alternative . Educational Leadership, 48, 43-48.
39.
Lane, S. (1993). The conceptual framework for the development of a mathematics performance assessment instrument. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 12(2), 16-23.
40.
Lawrenz, F. (1992). Authentic assessment. In F. Lawrenz, K. Cochran, J. Krajcik, & P. Simpson (Eds.), Research matters... to the science teacher (NARST Monograph No. 5) (pp. 65-70). Manhattan, KS : National Association of Research in Science Teaching .
41.
Linn, R.L. (1994). Performance assessment: Policy promises and technical measurement standards. Educational Researcher, 23(9), 4-14.
42.
Linn, R.L., Baker, E., & Dunbar, S. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15-21.
43.
Linn, R.L., & Burton, E. (1994). Performance-based assessment: Implications of task specificity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices , 13(1), 5-8, 15.
44.
MacGinitie, W.H. (1993). Some limits of assessment. Journal of Reading, 36, 556-560.
45.
Maeroff, G.I. (1991). Assessing alternative assessment. Phi Delta Kappan,73, 273-281.
46.
Maker, C.J. (1992). Intelligence and creativity in multiple intelligences: Identification and development. Educating Able Learners: Discovering & Nurturing Talent, 17, 12-19.
47.
Maker, C.J. (1993). Creativity, intelligence, and problem solving: A definition and design for cross-cultural research and measurement related to giftedness. Gifted Education International, 9, 68-77.
48.
Maker, C.J., Nielson, A.B., & Rogers, J.A. (1994). Giftedness, diversity, and problem-solving, Teaching Exceptional Children, 27(1), 4-18.
49.
Maker, C.J., Rogers, J.A., & Nielson, A., B. ( 1992). Assessment/ observation of problem solving abilities. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.
50.
Maker, C. J., & Schiever, S. W. (Eds.). (1989). Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities. Vol. II. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
51.
Marzano, R.J. (1994). Lessons from the field about outcome-based performance assessments. Educational Leadership, 51(6), 44-50.
52.
Matthews, D. (1988). Gardner's multiple intelligence theory: An evaluation of relevant research literature and a consideration of its application to gifted education. Roeper- Review, 11, 100-104.
53.
Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher , 23(2), 13-23.
54.
Miller, M.D., & Legg, S.M. (1993). Alternative assessment in a high-stakes environment . Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 12(2), 9-15.
55.
Moon, T.R. (1993). A teacher's guide to developing performance-based assessments. Charlottesville, VA: Bureau of Educational Research, University of Virginia .
56.
Nuttall, D.L. (1992). Performance assessment: The message from England . Educational Leadership, 49(8), 54-57.
57.
Ogbu, J.U. (1988, spring). Human intelligence testing: A cultural-ecological perspective. National Forum, 68(2), 23-29.
58.
O'Neil, J. (1992). Putting performance assessment to the test. Educational Leadership, 49(8), 14-19.
59.
Patton, J.M. (1992). Assessment and identification of African-American learners with gifts and talents. Exceptional Children, 59, 150-159.
60.
Patton, J.M., Prillaman, D., VanTassel-Baska, J. (1990). The nature and extent of programs for the disadvantaged/gifted in the United States and territories. Gifted Child Quarterly , 34, 94-96.
61.
Peers, M.G. (1993). A teacher/researcher's experience with performance-based assessment as a diagnostic tool. Journal of Reading, 36, 544-548.
62.
Puckett, M.B., & Black, J.K. (1994). Authentic assessment of the young child. New York: Merrill.
63.
Reckase, M. (Ed.). (1993). Performance assessment [Special Issue]. Journal of Educational Measurement , 30(3).
64.
Reichel, A.G. (1994). Performance assessment: Five practical approaches . Science and Children, 32(2), 21-25.
65.
Rivera, D. (1993). Performance, authentic, and portfolio assessment: Emerging alternative assessment options in search of an empirical basis. Diagnostique, 18, 325-348.
66.
Robinson, A. (1994). Assessment, identification, and evaluation. Tempo, 14(2), 1, 22-23.
67.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B. (1979). A note on percent variance explained as a measure of the importance of effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 9, 395-396.
68.
Rosnow, R.L., & Rosenthal, R. (1988). Focused tests of significance and effect size estimation in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 203-208.
69.
Semple, B. McL. (1992). Performance assessment: An international experiment (ETS Report No. 22-CAEP-06). Princeton, NJ: IAEP/ETS.
70.
Shavelson, R.J., Baxter, G.P., & Pine, J. (1991). Performance assessment in science. Applied Mensurement in Science, 4, 347-362.
71.
Smith, G.P., Miller, M.C., & Jov, J. (1988). A case study of the impact of performance-based testing on the supply of minority teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 45-53.
Thorndike, R.L., & Hagen, E. (1955). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education . New York: Wiley & Sons. Udall, A.J., & Passe, M. (1993). Gardner-based/Performance-based Assessment Notebook . Charlotte, NC: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools.
79.
Walters, J. (1992). Application of multiple intelligences research in alternative assessment. In Focus on Evaluation and Measurement . Washington, DC: National Research Symposium on Limited English Proficient Student Issues. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 349 812)
80.
Walters, J.M., & Gardner, H. (1985). The development and education of intelligences . In F. Link (Ed.), Essays on the intellect (pp. 1-21). Washington, DC: Curriculum Development Associates.
81.
Walters, J., & Gardner, H. (1986). The theory of multiple intelligences: Some issues and answers. In R. J. Sternberg & R. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligences (pp. 163-181). New York: Cambridge University Press.
82.
Weinberg, R.A. (1989). Intelligence and IQ: Landmark issues and great debates. American Psychologist, 44, 98-104.
83.
Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessment: Authenticity, context, and validity . Phi Delta Kappan,75, 200-214.
84.
Wolf, D., Bixby J., Glenn III, J., & Gardner, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education: Volume 17 (pp. 31-74). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
85.
Wolf, D.P., LeMahieu, P.G., & Eresh, J. (1992). Good measure: Assessment as a tool for educational reform. Educational Leadership, 49(8), 8-13.
86.
Worthen, B.R. (1993). Critical issues that will determine the future of alternative assessment. Phi Delta Kappan,74, 444-454.
