Although researchers have found that students of students are especially affected by a lack of challenge in the classroom. Few studies investigate the behaviors in which high-potential students engage when they are not challenged, and these studies are either dents in their sample. Qualitative methodology was used to determine the behaviors and strategies used by 12 high-potential, middle school students when they did not feel challenged in school; teacher reaction to these behaviors was also documented. Data analysis revealed that students engaged in the following behaviors: selective attention, focused curricular involvement, involvement with others, partrcipation in extracurricular activities, and lack of effort/selected effort. Few teachers associated these behaviors with a lack of challenge, and those who recognized the behaviors did not attempt to differentiate the learning process for the students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., & Renner, J.W. (1992). Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 105-120.
2.
Archambault, F.X., Jr., Westberg, K.L., Brown, S.W., Hallmark, B.W., Emnioiis, C.L., & Zhang, W. (1993). Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Results of a national survey of classroom teachers [Research monograph 93101] . Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
3.
Bernstein, H.T. (1985). The new politics of textbook adoption. Phi Delta Kappan,66, 463-466.
4.
Chall, J.S., & Conard, S.S. (1991). Should textbooks challenge students? The case for ecrsier or harder textbooks. New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
Chiang-Soong, B., & Yager, R.E. (1993). The inclusion of STS material in the most frequently used secondary science textbooks in the U. S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 339-349.
6.
Chiappetta, E.L., Sethna, G.H., & Fillman, D.A. (1993). Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes?Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 787-797.
7.
Coleman, L.J., & Cross, T.L. (1988). Is being gifted a social handicap ?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11, 41-56.
8.
Cross, T.L., Coleman, L.J., & Stewart, R.A. (1993). The social cognition of gifted adolescents: An exploration of the stigma of giftedness paradigm. Roeper Review , 16, 37-40.
9.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure . New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Delcourt, M.A.B., Loyd, B.H., Cornell, D.G., & Goldberg, M.D. (1994). Evaluation of the effects of programming arrangements on student learning outcomes. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. (Research Monograph 94107)
11.
Elliot, D.L., Nagel, K.C., & Woodward, A. (1986). Scientific illiteracy in elementary school science textbook programmes. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 73-76.
12.
Eltinge, E.M., & Roberts, C.W. (1993). Linguistic content analvsis: A method to measure science as inquiry in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 65-83.
13.
Erb, T.O. (1994). Teaching diverse students: Focus on the learning cycle. Schools in the Middle, 4, 16-20.
14.
Ethier, L.A. (1993). High school students' attitudes about the significance of extracurricular activities to their schooling. MastersAbstracts International, 31(2), 551.
15.
Farmer, R., & Sundberg, N.D. (1986). Boredom proneness: The developmenl and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality, Assessment, 50, 4-17.
Feldhusen, J.F., & Kroll, M.D. (1991). Boredom or challenge for the academically talented student. Gifted Education International, 7, 80-81.
18.
Flanders, J.R. (1987). How much of the content in mathematics textbooks is new?Arithmetic Teacher, 35, 18-23.
19.
Galbraith, J. (1985). The eight great gripes of gifted kids: Responding to special needs. Roeper Review, 8, 15-18.
20.
Graeber, A.O., & Baker, K.M. (1991). Curriculum materials and misconceptions concerning multiplication and division. Focus on Learning Problems andMathematics, 13(3), 25-38.
21.
Haas, M.E. (1991). An analysis of the social science and history concepts in elementary social studies textbooks grades 1-4. Theory and Research in Social Education, 19, 211-220.
22.
Hilliard, S.A.D. (1993). Who's in school? Case studies of highly creative adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts International, A 54(6), 2110.
23.
Hootstein, E.W. (1994). Motivating middle school students to learn. Middle School Journal, 25, 31-34.
24.
Kirst, M.W. (1982). How to improve schools without spending more money . Phi Delta Kappan,64, 6-8.
25.
Kohn, A. (1993). Rewards versus learning: A response to Paul Chance . Phi Delta Kappan,74, 783-787.
26.
Kunkel, M.A., Chapa, B., Patterson, G., & Walling, D.D. (1992). Experience of giftedness: "Eight great gripes" six years later. Roeper Review, 15, 10-14.
27.
Larson, R.W., & Richards, M.H. (1991). Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students. American Journal of Education, 99, 418-443.
28.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Lounsbury, J., & Johnston, J.H. (1988). Life in three sixth grades . Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
30.
Maker, C.J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems Corporation .
31.
Menke, D., & Davey, B. (1994). Teachers' views of textbooks and text reading instruction: Experience matters. Journal of Readirrg, 37, 464-470.
32.
Mikulas, W.L., & Vodanovich, S.J. (1993). The essence of boredom . Psychological Record, 43, 3-12.
33.
Mitchell, M.T. (1993). Situational interest in the secondary mathematics classroom. Dissertation Abstracts International, A 53(9), 3133.
34.
National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newburv Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Reis, S.M., & Purcell, J.H. (1993). An analysis of content elimination and strategies used by teachers in the curriculum compacting study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 147-170.
37.
Reis, S.M., Burns, D.E., & Renzulli, J.S. (1992). Curriculunt compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
38.
Reis, S.M., Westberg, K.L., Kulikowich, J., Caillard, F., Hebert, T., Plucker, J., Purcell, J.H., Rogers, J.B., & Smist, J.M. (1993). Why not let high ability students start school in January? The curriculum compacting study. Storrs, CT : The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented .
39.
Renner, J.W., Abraham, M.R., Crzybowski, E.B., & Marek, E.A. (1990). Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of four physics concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 35-54.
40.
Renzulli, J.S. (1988). The multiple menu model for developing differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly , 32, 298-309.
41.
Shepardson, D.P., & Pizzini, E.L. (1991). Questioning levels of junior high school science textbooks and their implications for learning textual information. Science Education, 75, 673-682.
42.
Sink, C.A., Barnett, J.E., & Hixon, J.E. (1991). Self-regulated learning and achievement by middle-school children. Psychological Reports, 69, 979-989.
43.
Sisk, D.A. (1988). The bored and disinterested gifted child: Going through school lockstep. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11, 5-18.
44.
Starko, A.J. (1986). It's about time: Inservice strategies for curriculum compacting. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press. Taylor , B.M., & Frye, B.J. (1988). Pretesting: Minimize time spent on skill work for intermediate readers . The Reading Teacher, 42, 100-103.
45.
Usiskin, Z. (1987). Why elementary algebra can, should, and must be an eighth-grade course for average students. MatheiiiaticsTeacher, 80, 428-438.
46.
Westberg, K.L., Archambault, F.X., Jr., Dobyns, S.M., & Salvin, T.J. (1993). The classroom practices observation study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 120-146.
