Baum, S.M. (1985). Learning disabled students with superior cogntitive abilities: A validation study of descriptive behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut, Storrs.
2.
Baum, S.M., Owen, S.V., & Dixon, J. (1991). To be gifted and learning disabled: From identification to practical intervention strategies. Mansfield Center, Connecticut: Creative Learning Press.
3.
Baum, S.M., Emerick, L.J., Herman, G.N. & Dixon, J. (1989). Identification, programs and enrichment strategies for gifted learning disabled vouth. Roeper Review, 12, 48-53.
4.
Baurn, S.M. & Owen, S.V. (1988). High abilitv learning disabled students: How are they different?Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 321-326.
5.
Burns, D.E. (1990). Pathways to investigative skills: Instructional lessons for guiding students from problem finding to final product. Mansfield Center, Connecticut: Creative Learning Press .
6.
Burns, D.E. (1987). The effects of group training activities on students' creative productivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut.
7.
Bulter-Por, N. (1987). Underachievers in school: Issues and intervention . New York: JohnWiley and Sons .
8.
Colangelo, N. (1984). Counseling the Gifted Underachiever. Keynote address at the third Annual AEGUS (Association for the Education of Gifted Underachieving Students) Conference. St. Paul, Minnesota: College of St. Thomas.
9.
Cray-Andrews, M., Baum, S.M. & Gubbins, E.J. (1987). Gifted students as creative producers. The GiftedChild Today, 10 (1), 22-24.
10.
Crittenden, M.R., Kaplan, M.H. & Heim, J.K. (1984). Developing effective study skills and self-confidence in academically able young adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly , 28 (1), 25-30
11.
Delcourt, M. (1993). Creative productivity among secondary school students: combining energy, interest and imagination. Gifted Child Quarterly , 37 (1), 23-31.
12.
Delisle, J.R. (1981). The revolving door model of identification and programming for the academically gifted: The correlates of creative Production. Unpublished doctoraldissertation. University of Connecticut .
13.
Emerick, I.J. (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students' perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36 (3), 140-146.
14.
Gubbins, E.J. (1982). Revolving Door Identification Model: Characteristics of talent pool students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. of Connecticut.
15.
Hastings, J.M. (1982). A program for gifted underachievers. Roeper Review, 4 (4), 42.
16.
Jick, T.D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly,24 (4), 602-611.
17.
Karafelis, P. (1986). The effects of the tri-art drama curriculum on the reading comprehension ofstudents with varying levels of cognitive ability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut .
18.
Kaufman, F. (1991). The Courage to Succeed: A New Look at Underachievement . Keynote address at fourth Annual AEGUS (Association for the Education of Gifted Underachieving Students) Conference. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama.
19.
Lowenstein, L.F. (1977). An empirical study concerning the incidence, diagnosis, treatments, and follow-up of academically underachieving children. Khartoum, Sudan: University of Khartoum . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 166 922)
20.
Mitchell, E.S. (1986). Multiple triangulation. A methodology for nursing science. Advances in NursingScience, 8 (3), 18-26.
21.
Moon, S.M. (1991). Case study research in gifted education. In N. Buchanan & J. Feldhusen(Eds.), Conducting Research and Evaluation in Gifted Education. (pp. 157-178). NewYork: Teachers College Press.
22.
Owen, S.V., & Baum, S.M. (1991). SEAT: Self-efficacy for academic tasks. In Baum, S.M., Owen, S.V., & Dixon, J. To be gifted and learning disabled: From identification to practical intervention strategies. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
23.
Passow, A.H. & Goldberg, M.L. (1958). Study of underachieving gifted. Educational Leadership, 16, 121-125.
24.
Reid, B.D. (1991). Research needs in gifted education: A study of practitioners' perceptions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut.
25.
Reis, S.M. (1981). An analysis of the productivity of gifted students participating in programs using the revolving door identification model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut.
26.
Reis, S.M. & Cellerino, M.B. (1983). Guiding gifted students through independent study. Teaching Exceptional Children, 15 (3), 136-139.
27.
Rcis, S.M. & Hébert, T.P. (1985). Creating Practicing professionals in gifted programs: Encouraging students to become young historians. Roeper Review , 8 (2), 101-104.
28.
Renzulli, J.S., & Baum, S.M. (1989). Development of Characteristics of Creative Productivity . Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut . Unpublished manuscript.
29.
Renzulli, J.S., & Reis, S.M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive planfor educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
30.
Renzulli, J.S. (1977a). The enriclunent triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted. Mansfield Center, Connecticut : Creative Learning Press.
Renzulli, J.S., Smith, L.H.White, A.J., Callahan, C.M., & Hartman. R.K. (1977). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristies of superior students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
33.
Rimm, S.B. (1986). Underachievement syndrome: Causes and cures. Watertown, Wisconsin: Apple Publishing.
34.
Scruggs, T.E. & Cohn, S.J. (1983). A university-based summer program tor a highly able but poorly achieving Indiana child. Gifted Child Quarterly , 27 (2), 90-93.
35.
Smith, H.W. (1975). Triangulation: The necessity for multi-method approaches. In W.H. Smith (Ed.), Strategies of social research: The methodological imagination. (pp. 271-292) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36.
Strauss, A.L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. NY : Camhridge University Press.
