This study offers empirical support for the importance of metacognition in giftedness based on the performance of 48 school-identified learning-disabled gifted, gifted, leaming-disabled, and average-performing boys in Grades 5/6 and 11/12 on assessments of metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive skill on a think-aloud error-detection reading task, error detection, and comprehension; prior knowledge was covaried. Performance of gifted and learning-disabled gifted students exceeded that of the average-performing and learning-disabled students on most measures at both grade levels. A main effect was found for grade; however, secondary average-performing students' performance was closer to that of the gifted and leaming-disabled gifted students' performance. Metacognitive performance of the learning-disabled gifted students resembled that of the gifted sample more than that of the leaming-disabled sample.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams. M. & Bruce, B. (1982). Background knowledge and reading comprehension . In J. A. Langer & M. T. Smith-Burke (Eds.), Reader meets author/bridging the gap (pp. 2-25). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
2.
Alley, G., & Deshler, D. (1979). Teaching the learning disabled adolescent: Strategies and methods. Denver, CO: Love.
3.
Anderson, R.C. (1984). Some reflections on the acquisition of knowledge . Educational Researcher, 13(9), 5-10.
4.
Anderson, R.C. (1985). Role of the reader's schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed.) (pp. 372-384). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
5.
Aulls, M.W. (1978). Developmental and remedial reading in the middle grades. Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
6.
Aulls, M.W., & Graves, M. (1985). Quest: A scholastic reading improvement series: A teacher's manual for: High on a mountain. New York: Scholastic.
7.
Baker, L. (1979). Comprehension monitoring: Identifying and coping with text confusions. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 365-374.
8.
Baker, L. (1984). Children's effective use of multiple standards for evaluating their comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 588-597.
9.
Baker, L. (1985). Differences in the standards used by college students to evaluate their comprehension of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 297-313.
10.
Baker. L. & Anderson, R.I. (1982). Effects of inconsistent information on text processing: Evidence for comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 281-294.
11.
Baker, L., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
12.
Barton, J.M., & Starnes. W.T. (1989). Identifying distinguishing characteristics of gifted and talented/learning disabled students. Roeper Reuiew , 12, 23-29.
13.
Baum, S. (1984). Meeting the needs of learning-disabled gifted students. Roeper Review, 7, 16-19.
14.
Baum, S. (1988). An enrichment program for gifted learning-disabled students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 226-230.
15.
Baum, S., Emerick, L.J., Herman, G.N., & Dixon, J. (1989). Identification, programs and enrichment strategies for gifted learning disabled youth. Roeper Review, 12, 48-53.
16.
Bereiter, C., & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction , 2, 131-156.
17.
Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H.,& Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of education objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook 1. Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
18.
Borkowski, J.G. (1985). Signs of intelligence: Strategy generalization and metacognition. In S. R. Yussen (Ed.), The growth of reflection in children (pp. 105-144). Orlando, FL: Academic.
19.
Borkowski. J.G., Estrada, M.T., Milstead, M., & Hale, C.A. (1989). General problem-solving skills: Relations between metacognition and strategic processing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 57-70.
20.
Borkowski, J.G., & Peck, V.A. (1986). Causes and consequences of metamemory in gifted children. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 182-200). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Bos, C.S., & Filip, D. (1982). Comprehension monitoring skills in learning disabled and average students. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities , 2(1), 79-86.
22.
Bracewell. R.J. (1983). Investigating the control of writing skills. In P. Mosenthal.L. Tamor, & S. A. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 177-203). New York: Longman.
23.
Breuleux, A. ( 1991). The analysis of writers' think aloud protocols: Developing a principled coding scheme for ill-structured tasks. In G. Denhière and J.-P. Rossi (Eds.). Text and text processing (pp. 333-362). Amsterdam: North Holland.
24.
Brown, A.L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem in metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Brown, A.L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce. & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453-481). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
Brown. A.L. (1982). Learning how to learn from reading. In J. A. Langer & M. T. Smith-Burke (Eds.), Reader meets author/bridging the gap (pp. 26-54). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
27.
Brown, A.L. (1985). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed.) (pp. 501-526). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
28.
Brown, A.L., & Day, J.D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 22. 1-14.
29.
Brown. A.L., & DeLoache, J.S. (1978). Skills, plans, and self-regulation . In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 3-35). Hillsdale, NJ : Edbaum.
30.
Brown, A.L., & Palinscar, A.S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities. 2(1), 1-17.
31.
Campione, J.C., & Brown. A.L. (1978). Toward a theory of intelligence: Contributions from research with retarded children. Intelligence, 2, 279-304.
32.
Chase, W.G., & Ericsson, K.A. (1981). Skilled memory. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.). Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 141-189). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
Coleman, E.B., & Shore, B.M. (1991). Problem-solving processes of high and average performers in physics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted , 14, 366-379.
34.
Dale, E., & Chall, J.S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability: Instructions . Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 37-54.
35.
Dangel, H.L., & Ensrninger, E.E. (1988). The use of a discrepancy formula with learning-disabled students. Learning DisabilitiesFocus, 4(1), 24-31
Davidson, J.E. (1986). The role of insight in giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 151-181) Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Devall, Y.L. (1982). Some cognitive and creative characteristics and their relationship to reading comprehension in gifted and nongifted fifth graders. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 5, 259-273.
39.
Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
Fehrenbach, C.R. (1991). Gifted/average readers: Do they use the same reading strategies?Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 125-127.
41.
Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist , 34, 906-911.
43.
Flavell, J.H., & Wellman, H.M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. V. Kail & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 3-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44.
Flavell, J.H., Speer, J.R., Green, F.L., & August, D.L. (1981). The development of comprehension monitoring and knowledge about communication. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46 (5, Serial No. 192).
45.
Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221-233.
46.
Flower, L.S., Hayes, J.R., & Swarts, H. (1983). Reader-based revision of functional documents: The scenario principle. In P. V. Anderson.J. Brockmann, & C. R. Miller (Eds.), New essays in technical and scientific communication: Research, theory, and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 41-58). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
47.
Forness, S.R., Sinclair, E., & Guthrie, D. (1983). Learning disability formulas: Their use in actual practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 107-114.
48.
Fox, L.H. (1983). Gifted students with reading problems: An empirical study. In L. H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin (Eds.), Learning-disabled/ gifted children: Identification and programming (pp. 117-139). Baltimore, MD: University Park.
49.
Fox, L.H., Brody, L., & Tobin. D. (1983). Learning-disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming. Baltimore, MD: Univer sity Park.
50.
Fry, E. ( 1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516, 575-578.
51.
Gagné, F. (1991). Toward a differentiated model of giftedness and talent. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 65-80). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
52.
Gallagher, J.J., & Courtright, R.D. (1986). The educational definition of giftedness and its policy implications. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 93-111). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Garner, R. (1980). Monitoring of understanding: An investigation of good and poor readers' awareness of induced miscomprehensions of text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 55-63.
54.
Garner, R. (1981). Monitoring of passage inconsistency among poor comprehenders: A preliminary test of the "piecemeal processing" explanation . Journal of Educational Research, 74, 159-162.
55.
Garner. R., & Anderson, J. (1981-82). Monitoring-of-understanding research: Inquiry directions, methodological dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Education, 50, 70-76.
56.
Garner, R., & Reis, R. (1981). Monitoring and resolving comprehension obstacles: An investigation of spontaneous text lookbacks among upper grade good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 569-582.
57.
Ginn studies in Canadian history: Teacher's manual. (1972). Toronto. Ontario, Canada: Ginn.
58.
Gray, W.S. (1937). The nature and types of reading. The teaching of reading: A second report. Thirty-sixth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1. Bloomington. IL: Public School.
59.
Greeno, J.G. (1978). Natures of problem-solving abilities. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: Vol. 5. Human information processing (pp. 239-270). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60.
Greeno, J.G., & Simon. H. A. (1988). Problem solving and reasoning. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein , G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 2. Learning and cognition (2nd ed.) (pp. 589-672). New York: Wiley.
61.
Haller, E.P., Child, D.A., & Walberg, H.J. (1988). Can comprehension be taught? A quantitative synthesis of "metacognitive" studies. Educational Researcher, 17(9), 58.
62.
Hammill, D.D. (1990). On defining learning disabilities: An emerging consensus. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 74-84.
Hare, V.C. (1981). Readers' problem identification and problem-solving strategies for high- and low-knowledge articles. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 359-365.
65.
Hare, V.C., & Bouchardt, K.M. (1985). Good and poor comprehenders' detection of errors revisited. Journal of Educational Research , 78, 237-241.
66.
Hayes, J.R., Flower. L., Schriver, K.A., Stratman, J.F., & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Vol. 2. Reading, writing, and language learning (pp. 176-240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67.
Jackson, N.E. (1993). Moving into the mainstream? Reflections on the study of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 46-50.
68.
Jackson, N.E. & Butterfield. E.C. (1986). A conception of giftedness designed to promote research. In R. J. Stemberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 151-181). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69.
Jacobs. L. (1984). Cognition and learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children.16, 213-218.
70.
Johnston, P.H., & Afflerbach. P. (1985). The process of constructing main ideas from text. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 207-232.
71.
Kanevsky, L. (1990). Pursuing qualitative differences in the flexible use of a problem-solving strategy by young children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 115-140.
72.
Kneedler. R.D. & Hallahan, D.P. (1981). Self-monitoring of on-task behavior with learning-disabled children: Current studies and directions. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2(3), 73-82.
Kreutzer, M.A., Leonard. C., & Flavell, J.H. (1975). An interview study of children knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development , 40(1, Serial No. 159).
75.
Langer, J.A. (1981). From theory to practice: A prereading plan. Journal of Reading, 25, 152-156.
76.
Lewis, C. (1981). Skill in algebra. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 85-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
77.
Loper, A.B., Hallahan, D.P., & lanna, S.O. (1982). Meta-attention in learning-disabled and normal students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 29-36.
78.
Maker, C.J. (1977). Providing programs for the gifted handicapped. Reston. VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
79.
Markman, E.M. (1977). Realizing that you don't understand: A preliminary investigation. Child Development, 48, 986-992.
80.
Markman, E.M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development , 50, 643-655.
81.
Masson, M.E.J. (1982). A framework of cognitive and metacognitive determinants of reading skill. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities , 2(1). 37-44.
82.
Meichenbaum. D., Burland, S., Gruson, L., & Cameron, R. (1985). Metacognitive assessment In S. R. Yussen (Ed.), The growth of reflection in children (pp. 3-30). Orlando, FL: Academic .
83.
Miller, W.H. (1974). Reading diagnosis kit. New York: Center for Applied Research in Education.
84.
Montague. M. (1991). Gifted and learning-disabled gifted students' knowledge and use of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted.14, 393-411.
85.
Myers, M., & Paris. S.G. (1978). Children's metacognitive knowledge about reading . Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 680-690.
86.
Nielsen, M.E., & Mortorff-Albert, S. (1989). The effects of special education service on the self-concept and school attitude of learning-disabled/gifted students. Roeper Review, 12, 29-36.
87.
Newman, R.S., & Hagen, J.W. (1981). Memory strategies in children with learning disabilities . Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 1, 297-312.
88.
Olsen, G.M., Duffy, S.A., & Mack, R.L. (1984). Thinking-out-loud as a method for studying real-time comprehension processes. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 253-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
89.
Olshavsky, J.E. (1976-1977). Reading as problem solving: An investigation of strategies. Reading Research Quarterly , 12, 654-674.
90.
Paris, S.G., & Jacobs, J.E. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children's reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development , 55, 2083-2093.
91.
Paris, S.G., & Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 5-22.
92.
Rosner, S.L., & Seymour, J. (1983). The gifted child with a learning disability: Clinical evidence. In L. H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin (Eds.), Learning-disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming (pp. 77-97). Baltimore, MD: University Park.
93.
Schiff, M.M., Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (1981). Scatter analysis of WISC-R profiles for learning-disabled children with superior intelligence. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 14, 400-404.
94.
Schoenfeld, A.H. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance . Cognitive Science, 7, 329-363.
95.
Schumaker, J., Deshler, D., Alley, G., Warner, M., & Denton, P. (1982). Multipass: A learning strategy for improving reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 295-304.
96.
Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1988). Acquisition and transfer of learning strategies by gifted and nongifted students. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 153-166.
97.
Shore, B.M. (1982). Developing a framework for the study of learning style in high-level learning. In J. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles and brain behauior (pp. 152-156). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
98.
Shore. B.M. (1986). Cognition and giftedness: New research directions . Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 24-27.
99.
Shore, B.M., & Carey, S.M. (1984). Verbal ability and spatial task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 255-259.
100.
Shore, B.M., & Dover, A.C. (1987). Metacognition, intelligence, and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 37-39.
101.
Shore, B.M., & Kanevsky, L.S. (1993). Thinking processes: Being and becoming gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 131-145). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
102.
Simmons, D.C., Kameenui, E.J., & Darch, C.B. (1988). The effect of textual proximity on fourth- and fifth-grade learning-disabled students' metacognitive awareness and strategic comprehension behavior. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 380-395.
103.
Simon, D.P., & Simon, H.A. (1978). Individual differences in solving physics problems . In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 325-347). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
104.
Slife, B.D., Weiss, J., & Bell, T. (1985). Separability of metacognition and cognition: Problem solving in learning-disabled and regular students. Journal of Educational Psychology.77. 437-445.
105.
Smith, D.C. (1971). The seigneury of Longueuil. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ginn.
106.
Sternberg, R.J. (1981). A componential theory of intellectual giftedness . Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 86-93.
107.
Sternberg, R.J. (1984). What should intelligence tests test? Implications of a triarchic theory of intelligence for intelligence testing. Educational Researcher, 13, 5-15.
108.
Sternberg, R.J., & Davidson, J.E. (1985). Cognitive development in the gifted and talented. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 37-74). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
109.
Suter, D.P., & Wolf, J.S. (1987). Issues in the identification and programming of the gifted/learning disabled child. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 227-237.
110.
Swarts, H.Flower, L.S., & Hayes, J.R. (1984). Designing protocol studies of the writing process: An introduction. In R. Beach & L. S. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 53-71). New York: Guilford .
111.
Terman. L.M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1. Mental and physical traits of 1,000 gifted children. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
112.
Thompson, B. (1994, February). Why multivariate methods are usually vital in research: Some basic concepts. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Southwestern Society for Research in Human Development, Austin, TX. (Invited keynote address)
113.
Thorndike, E.L. (1917). Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 323-332.
114.
Torgesen, J.K. (1977). The role of nonspecific factors in the task performance of learning disabled children: A theoretical assessment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 33-40.
115.
U.S. Commissioner of Education. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented (Document 72-5020). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
116.
Whitmore, J.R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Winograd, P., & Johnston, P. (1982). Comprehension monitoring and the error-detection paradigm. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14. 61-76.
119.
Winograd, T. (1983). Language as a cognitive process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
120.
Wong, B.Y.L. (1979). Increasing retention of main ideas through questioning strategies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 42-47.
121.
Wong, B.Y.L. (1982). Strategic behaviors in selecting retrieval cues in gifted, normal achieving, and learning-disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 33-37.
122.
Wong, B.Y.L. (1985). Metacognition and learning disabilities. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance: Vol. 2. Instructional practices (pp. 137-180). Orlando, FL: Academic .
123.
Wong, B.Y.L., & Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning-disabled and normally-achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228-240.
124.
Wong, B.Y.L., & Sawatsky, D. (1982). Sentence elaboration and retention of good, average. and poor readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 229-236.
125.
Yussen, S.R., & Bird. J.E. (1979). The development of metacognitive awareness in memory, communication, and attention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 300-313.
