Social,Emotional,and Behavioral Adjustment of Accelerated Students,Students in Gifted Classes,and Regular Students in Eighth Grade

Abstract

This study investigated differences in the social, emotional, and behavioral adjustment of gifted and regular eighth-grade students. Three groups were identified: (a) gifted students who entered school early or skipped at least one grade K-7, (b) students enrolled in eighth-grade gifted classes, and (c) regular eighth-grade students. Data were self-reported in the National Education Longitudinal Study (NELS) from the National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) (Ingels et al., 1989). Results indicated that accelerated students and students in gifted classes had better perceptions of their social relationships and emotional development and tended to have fewer serious school behavior problems than regular students. Contrary to commonly held beliefs, most students who entered school early or skipped elementary grades did not report unusual social isolation or experience profound emotional difficulties. They had serious behavioral problems less frequently than regular students.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Renbow. C.P. (1991). Meeting the needs of gifted students through acceleration . In M. C. Wang , M. C. Reynolds , & H. J. Walberg (Eds.). Handbook of special education (Vol. 4. pp. 23-36). Elmsford. NY: Pergamon.

Brody, L.E. , & Benbow. C.P. (1987). Accelerative strategies: How effective are they for the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 31. 105-109.

Brody, L.E. , & Stanley, J.C. (1991). Young college students: Assessing factors that contribute to success. In W. Senrthern & E. Jones (Eds.). Academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 102-132). New York: Teachers College Press.

Cornell. D.G. , Callahan. C.M. Bassin, L.E. , & Ramsay, S.G. (1991) Affective development in accelerated students. In W. Southern & E Jones (Eds.). Academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 74 101). New York: Teachers College Press.

Cox, J. Daniel, N. , & Boston. B.O. (1985). Educating able learners. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Daurio, S.P. (1979). Educational enrichment versus acceleration: A review of the literature. In W. C. George. S. J. Cohn , & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Educating the gifted (pp. 13-63). Baltimore. MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Elkind, D. (1988). Mental acceleration. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11(4), 19-31.

Feldhusen, J.F. (1989). Synthesis of research on gifted youth. Educational Leadership, 46, 6-11.

Gagné, F. (1983). Perceptions of programs for gifted children: Agreement on principles, but disagreement over modalities. Journal of Special Education. 7(2). 51-56.

10.

Griffin, N. , Classin, L. , & Young, R.D. (1981). Measurement of global self-concept versus multiple role-specific self-concepts in adolescents Ado lescence, 26(1). 49-56.

11.

Hoffman, S.G. (1989). What the books don't tell you about grade skipping. Gifted Child Today. 12(1), 37-39.

12.

Howley, C.B. , & Howley, A.A. (1985). A personal record: Is acceleration worth the effort? Roeper Review. 8(1), 43 45.

13.

Ingels, S.J. , Abraham. S.Y. , Rasinski, K. , Karr, R. , Spencer, B.D. , & Frankel, M.R. (1959). User's manual: Notional education longitudinal study of 1988 (NCES Publication No. 90-464). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

14.

Janos. P.M. , & Robinson, N.R. (1985). The performance of students in a program of radical acceleration at the university level. Gifted Child Quarterly. 29, 175-179.

15.

Kulik, J.A. , & Kulik, C-I.. C. (1984). Effects of accelerated instruction on students. Review of Educational Research, 54, 409-426.

16.

National Commission on Excellence in Education ( 1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform . Washington. DC. U.S. Govemment Printing Office.

17.

Panel on Youth of the President's Science Advisory Committce. (1974) History of age grouping in America . In J. S. Coleman et al. (Eds.). Youth: Transition to adulthood (pp.9-29) Chicago. II University of Chicago Press.

18.

Richardson. T.M. , & Benbow. C.P. (1990). I ong-term effects of acceleration on the social-emotional adjustment of mathematically precocious youths. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3). 464-470.

19.

Rock. D.A. , & Pollack, J.M. (1991). Psychometric report for the NELS:88 base year test battery: Contractor report (NCES Publica tion No. 91-468). Washurgton, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

20.

Southern. W. T. , & Jones. E. D. (Eds.). (1991). The academic acceleration of gifted children. New York: Teachers Collego Press.

21.

Southern. T.W. , Jones. E.D. , & Fiscus. E.D. (1989). Practitioner objections to the academic acceleration of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly. 33, 29-35.

22.

Stanley. J.C. (1991). Critique of "Socioemotional adjustment of adolescent girls in a residential acceleration program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 67-70.

23.

VanTassel-Baska, J.C. (1986). Acceleration. In C. J. Maker (Ed.). Critical issues in gifted education. defensible programs for the gifted (pp. 179-196). Rockville. MD: Aspen.