The Relation of Gender and Academic Achievement to Career Self-Efficacy and Interests

Abstract

Career self-efficacy has been identified as an important variable in career choice and development. In this study, gender and academic achievement were studied in relation to career self-efficacy for female, mate, and sex-balanced occupations. Girls had higher efficacy expectations for some female careers and lower efficacy expectations for some male careers than boys. Girls and boys did not differ in their efficacy expectations for sex-balanced occupations. The overall influence of gender on career self-efficacy was quite modest. Achievement was found to be a more powerful predictor of career self-efficacy than gender. These findings are discussed in relation to the need to enable talented young women to realize their abilities through career achievement.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayres. A.L. (1980). Self efficacy theory: Implications for the career devetopntent of women. Unpuhiished doctoral dissenation. Ohio State University.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 84, 191 215.

Bandura. A. (1982). Self-efficacy theory in human agency. American Psychologist, 37. 122 147

Betz, N.E. , & Hackett. G. (1981). The relationship of career-related self efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28. 399-410.

Betz, N.E. , & Hackett, G. (1983) The relationship of mathematics self efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23. 329-345.

I lollinger, C.L. , & Fleming, E.S. (1984). Internal barriers to the realization of potential Correlates and intcrrelationships among gifted and talented female adolescents . Gifted Child Quarterly, 24. 113-117

Lent, R.W. Brown. S.D. , & Larkin. K.C. (1984). Relation of self efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 31. 356-363.

Lent. R.W. , Brown. S.D. , & Larkin, K.C. (1986). Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 33. 265 269.

Lent. R.W. , Brown. S.D. , & Larkin. K.C. (1987). Comparison of three theoreticatiy derived variables in predicting career and academic behavior: Self-efficacy, interest congruence. and consequence thinking . Jour nal of Counseling Psychology . 34. 293-298.

10.

Lent. R.W. , & Hackett. G. (1987). Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 347-382.

11.

Post-Kammer. P. , & Smith, P.L. (1985). Sex differences in career self-efficacy, consideration, and interests of eighth and ninth graders. Jour nal of Counseling Psychology, 32. 551-559.

12.

Post-Kammer, P. , & Smith, P.L. (1986) Sex differences in math and science self-efficacy measures among disadvantaged students. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 29, 89-101.

13.

Reis. S.M. (1987). We can't change what we don trecognize: Understand ing the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly . 31, 83-89.

14.

Reis, S.M. , & Callahan. C.M. (1989). Gifted females: Thev've come a long way-or have they? Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 12. 99 117.

15.

Schwartz. L.L. (1980). Advocacy for the neglected gifted: Females. Gifted Child Quarterly. 24. 113-117.

16.

U. S. Department of Labor (1989). Handbook of labor statistics. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.

17.

U. S. Women's Bureau. (1975). Handbookon women workers. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.