Creativity is an important facet of giftedness. Creativity is, however, very difficult to define and measure. Divergent thinking tests are often used, though of course they really just estimate the potential for creative thought. In the past few years, the technologies for the assessment and enhancement of divergent thinking have changed dramatically. This article reviews the most recent research on divergent thinking. Several new assessment techniques are reviewed, including those using either lenient or stringent solution standards, those relying on ideational pools (examinees' total output of ideas), and those involving qualitative aspects of ideation, Recent research showing moderately high predictive validity coefficients is also reviewed. The role played by evaluation and valuation in the divergent thinking process is outlined, as is the role of problem definition and problem identification. Special considerations for the creativity of gifted children are noted throughout the article, and specific directions for future research on the divergent thinking of gifted children are presented in the conclusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albert. R.S., & Runco. M.A. (1986). The achievement of eminence: A model of exceptionally gifted boys and their families. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 332-357). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Albert, R.S. & Runco, M.A. (1989). Independence and cognitive ability in gifted and exceptionally gifted boys. Journal of Youth and Adoles cence , 18, 221-230.
3.
Amabile, T.M. (1990). Within you. without you: A social psychology of creativity and beyond. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 61-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Bachelor, P.A., & Michael, W.B. (in press). The structure of intellect model revisited. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Creativity research handbook . Cresskill. NJ: Hampton.
5.
Baer, J.M. (1988). Long-term effects of creativity training with middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 183-193.
6.
Chand. L. & Runco. M.A. (in press). Problem finding skills as components in the creative process . Personality and Individual Differences.
7.
Cropley, A.J. (1992). More ways than one: Fostering creativity. Nor wood. NJ: Ablex.
8.
Csikszentmihalyi. M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.). Theories of creativity (pp. 190-212). Newbury Park. CA: Sage.
9.
Davidson, J.E., & Sternberg, R.J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 58-64.
10.
Dudek. S.Z., & Verreault. R. (1989). The creative thinking and ego functioning of children . Creativity Research Journal. 2. 64-86. Elkind, D. (1980). Children and adolescents. New York: Oxford University Press.
Feldhusen. J., & Treffinger. D. (1990). Creative tinnking and problem solving in gifted education (3rd ed.). Dubuque. IA: Kendall-Hunt.
13.
Gardner. H. (1982). Art. mind. and brain: A cognitive approach to creativityNew York: Basic Books .
14.
Getzels. J.W., & Jackson. P.W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York: Wiley .
15.
Goble. C., Moran, J.D., & Bomba, A.K. (1991). Maternal teaching techniques and preschool children's ideational fluency. Creativity Re search Journal. 4. 273280.
16.
Gruber. H.E. (1985). Giftedness and moral responsibility: Creative thinking and human survival. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.). The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 301-330). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
17.
Harrington. D.M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to "be creative on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434454.
18.
Hennessev. B. (1989). The effect of extrinsic constraint on children's creativity while using a computer. Creativity Research Journal , 2. 151-168.
19.
Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology . 71, 191-196.
20.
Hong, E., & Milgram. R.M. (1991). Original thinking in preschool children: A validation of ideational fluency measures. Creativity Research Journal . 5. 253260.
21.
Jenkins, J.E., Hedlund. D.E., & Ripple. R.E. (1988). Parental separation effects on children's divergent thinking abilities and creative potential. Child Study Journal.18, 149-159.
22.
Kagan, D.N. (1988). Measurements of divergent and coinplex thinking . Educotional and Psychological Measurerment, 48, 873-884.
23.
Khire. U. (in press). Guilford's SOI model and behavioral intelligence with special reference to creative behavioral abilities. In S. G. Isaksen.M. C. Murdock, R. L. Firestien, & D.J. Treffinger (Eds.), Understanding and recognizing creativity. Norwood. NJ: Ablex.
24.
MacKinnon. D. W. (1983). The highly effective individual. In R. S. Albert (Ed.). Genius and erninence: The social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement (pp. 114-127). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1960.)
25.
Michael, W.B., & Bachelor. P.A. (1990). Higher order structure-of-intellect creativity factors in divergent production tests: Reanalysis of a Guilford dara base. Creativity Research Journol.3. 58-74.
26.
Milgram, R.M. (1990). Creativity: An idea whose time has come and gone? In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.). Theories of creativity (pp. 215-233). Newbury Park. CA: Sage.
27.
Milgram, R.M., & Milgram, N.A. (1976). Group versus individual administration in the measurement of creative thinking in gifted and nongifted childrenChild Development, 47. 563565.
28.
Moran. J.D.,. & Liou, E.Y.Y. (1982). Effects of reward on creativity in college students of two levels of ability. Perceptual and Motor Skills.54. 43-48.
29.
Nicholls, J.G. (1983). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original or useful. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence: The social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement (pp. 265-279). OxfordPergamon.
30.
Okuda, S.M., Runco. M.A., & Bcrger. D.E. (1991). Creativity and the finding and solving of real world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment.9. 45-53.
31.
Radio Gaynor. J.I. & Runco. M.A. (1992). Family size. birth order. age-interval. and the creativity of children. Journal of Creative Behavior.26. 108-118.
32.
Renzuifi. J.S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition . Phi Delta Kappan, 60. 180-184.
33.
Renzulli. J.S. (1982). What makes a problem real: Stacking the illusive meaning of qualitative differences in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 147-156.
34.
Rosenblatt, E. & Winner. E. (1988). The art of clrildren's drawing. In H. Gardner & D. Perkins (Eds.), Art, mind. and education (pp. 3-16). Urbana. IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Rossman. B.B. & Gollob. H.E. (1975). Comparison of social judgments of creativity and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.31. 271-281.
36.
Runco, M.A. (1985). Reliability and convergent validity of ideational flexibility as a function of academic achievement. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 61. 10751081.
37.
Runco. M.A. (1986). Maximal performance on divorgent thinking tests by gifted. talented. and nongifted children. Psychology in the Schools.23, 308-315.
38.
Runco. M.A. (1987). The generality of creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 121-125. Runco. M.A. (1989). The creativity of children's art. Child Study Journal, 19, 177189.
39.
Runco, M.A. (1991a). Comment on investment and economic theories of creativity: A reply to Sternberg and Lubart. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 202-205.
40.
Runco, M.A. (1991b). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Runco, M.A. (1992a). Children's divergent thinking and creative ideation. Developmental Review.12, 233-264.
41.
Runco. M.A. (1992b). The evaluative, vaiuative. and divergent thinking of children. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 311-319.
42.
Runco. M.A. (in press-a). Creativity, cognition, and their educational implications . In J. C. Houtz (Ed.), The educational psychology of creativity. New York: Fordham University Press.
43.
Runco. M. A. (Ed.). (in press-b). Problem finding, problem solving. and creativity. Norwood. NJ: Ablex.
44.
Runco. M.A., & Albert, R.S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483-501.
45.
Runco. M.A. & Albert, R.S. (1986). Exceptional giftedness in early adolescence and intrafamilial divergent thinking. Journal of Youth and Adolescence.15. 333-342.
46.
Runco. M-A., & Basadur. M. (1990). Assessing ideational and evaluative skills and creative styles and attitudes. Paper presented at the International Engineering Management Conference, San Jose, CA.
47.
Runco. M.A., Ebersole. P., & Mraz. W. (1991). Self-actualization and creativity. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 161-167.
48.
Runco. M.A., & Mraz, W. (1992). Scoring divergent thinking tests using total ideational output and a creativity index. Educational and Psychological Measurement.52, 213-221.
49.
Runco. M.A., Noble, E.P., & Luptak. Y. (1990). Agreement between mothers and sons on ratings of creative activity. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 50. 673-680.
50.
Runco, M.A., & Okuda. S.M. (1988). Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17. 211-220.
51.
Runco. M.A. & Okuda, S.M. (in press). Reaching creatively gifted children through their learning styles, In R. M. Mitgram & R. Dunn (Eds.), Teaching the gifted and talented through their learning styles. New York: Praeger.
52.
Runco. M.A., & Smith, W.R. (1991). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295-302.
53.
Runco. M.A., & Vega. L. (1990). Evaluating the creativity of children's ideas . Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5. 439-452.
54.
Sawyers, J.K. & Canestaro, N.C. (1989). Creativity and achievement in design coursework. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 126-133.
55.
Schotte. D.E. & Clum, G.A. (1987). Problem-solving skills in suicidal psychiatric patients, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55. 49-54.
56.
Shaw, M.. & Runco, M. A. (Eds.), (in press). Creativity and affect. Norwood. NJ: Ablex.
57.
Simonton. D.K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart. T.I. (1991). Short selling the investment theory of creativity: A reply to Runco. Creativity Research Journal, 4. 200-202.
59.
Torrance. E.P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth-grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12, 195-199.
60.
Teqano. D.W.,. & Moran. J.D. (1989). Sex differences in the originality of preschool and elementary school children. Creativity Research Journal , 2. 102110.
61.
Urban. K.K. (1991). On the development of creativity in children. Creativity Research Journal, 4. 177-191.
62.
Wallach. M.A., & Kogan. N. (1965). Modes of thinking in children. New York: I Iolt. Rinehart & Winston.
63.
Walloclt. M.A., & Wing. C. (1969). The talented student. New York . Holt. Rinehart & Winston.
64.
Weisberg, R.W. (1986). Creativity, genius, and other myths. New York: Freeman. I.
