Programming,Grouping,and Acceleration in Rural School Districts: A Survey of Attitudes and Practices

Abstract

The development of gifted education programs is influenced by the characteristics of communities, values of residents, constraints that work against change and forces that impel change. The levels and types of programming offered to gifted students in rural and urban school districts were compared in this study. Rural and school districts were compared in this study. Rural and urban districts were also compared on their uses of ability grouping in regular education programs and academic acceleration. The results of the study revealed that rural school districts are less apt to use ability grouping or academic acceleration to provide a developed range of options for gifted and talented students. Sporadic extracurricular activities tend to play more important roles in rural programs. Factors that influence the nature and quality of education of gifted and talented students in rural areas are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cummings, S. , Briggs, R. , & Mercy, J. (1977). Preacher versus teacher: Local-cosmopolitan conflict over textbook censorship in an Appalachian community. Rural Sociology, 42 (1), 7-21.

Gallagher, J.J. (1985). Teaching the gifted child. Boston: Allyn Bacon.

Howley, C. , & Howley, A. (1988) Gifted programs: Equal access in rural areas. In Linking programs and resources for rural special education. Proceedings of the Annual National Conference of the American Council on Rural Special Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 295 350).

Kleinsasser, A.M. (1988). Equity in education for gifted rural girls. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 8(4), 27-30.

Nachtigal, P. (1982). Rural education: In search of a better way. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

National Rural Development Institute. (1986 ). Toward a definition of rural and small schools. Bellingham, WA: National Rural Development Institute .

Pendarvis, E.D. , Howley, A.A. , & Howley, C.B. (1990). The abilities of gifted children. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Pitts, M. (1988). Developing a gifted program: Suggestions for rural school administrators. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 8(4), 23-26.

Robinson, A. (1990). Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative leaming for talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 9-27.

10.

Slavin, R.E. (1990). Ability grouping, cooperative learning and the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 3-8.

11.

Southern, W.T. , & Jones, E.D. (1991). Academic acceleration: Background and issues. In W. T. Southern & E. D. Jones (Eds.), Academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 1-28). New York: Teachers College Press.

12.

Southern, W.T. , Jones, E.D. , & Fiscus, E.D. (1989a, November). Academic acceleration: Concerns of gifted students and their parents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Gifted Children, Cincinnati, OH.

13.

Southern, W.T. , Jones, E.D. , & Fiscus, E.D. (1989b). Practitioner objections to the academic acceleration of young gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 29-35.

14.

Spicker, H.H. , Southern, W.T. , & Davis, B. (1987). The rural gifted child. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31 (2), 28-32.

15.

State Board of Education. (1989). Ohio Educational Directory. Columbus, OH: Author.

16.

United States Bureau of the Census. (1983). Volume I. Characteristics of the population, Chapter D, PC80-1-D37. 1980 Census of the population, Ohio. Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, United States Govemment Printing Office.