I'm Black But Look At Me,I Am Also Gifted

Abstract

The lack of representation of black gifted children in educational programs for the gifted is a cause for great concem. Historical precedents and lack of empirical data on appropriate identification processes and educational planning techniques have been noted as part of the reason for the lack. A discussion of research data to date indicates that observation techniques, community involvement, and peer, parent, and teacher nominations are viable techniques to use in identifying the black gifted child. The data also show that leadership skills, creativity, and mental processing abilities, are good indicators of giftedness among the black students. Identification, curriculum, the instructional environment (teacher, setting, strategies), and evaluation are discussed as important aspects of a total plan for the black gifted child. Alternatives for program planning are recommended.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baldwin, A.Y. (1977). Tests do underpredict: A case study. Phi Delta Kappan, 58(8), 620-621.

Baldwin, A.Y. (1984). The Baldwin Identification Matrix 2 for the identification of the gifted and talented: A handbook for its use. New York: Trillium Press.

Baldwin, A.Y. (1985). Programs for the gifted and talented: Issues concerning minority populations. In F.D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 223-247). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Baldwin, A.Y. , Gear, G. , & Lucito, L. (Eds.). (1978). Educational planning for the gifted: Overcoming cultural, geographic, and socio-economic barriers. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Blackshear, P. (1979). A comparison of peer nomination and teacher nomination in the identification of the academically gifted, black, primary level student. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland , College Park.

Cohen, R. (1971). The influence of conceptual role-sets on measures of learning ability. Race and intelligence. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.

Dabney, M. (1980). The Black adolescent: Focus upon the creative positives, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children, Philadelphia, PA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 189 767).

Davis, P. (1978). Community-based efforts to increase the identification of the number of gifted minority children. Ypsilanti, MI : Eastern Michigan College of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 176 487).

DuBois, W.E.B. (1903). The talented tenth. In The Negro problem. New York: James Pott Company .

10.

Eysenck, H.L. (1973). Measurement of intelligence. Lancaster, England: Medical and Technical Publishing Company Ltd.

11.

Exum, H. , & Colangelo, N. (1979). Enhancing self-concept with gifted black students . Roeper Review, 1, 5-6.

12.

Frasier, M. & McCannon, C. (1981). Using bibliotherapy with gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 81-85.

13.

Hilliard, A.G. (1976). Alternative to IQ testing: An approach to the identification of the gifted "minority" children (Report No. 75 175). San Francisco, CA: San Francisco State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 147 009).

14.

Jensen, A. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1-123.

15.

Kaplan, S. (1986). Qualitatively differentiated curricula. In C.J. Maker (Ed.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for the gifted (pp. 121-134). Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers.

16.

Maker, C.J. (1982a). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers.

17.

Maker, C.J. (1982b). Teaching models in education of the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers.

18.

Meeker, M. & Meeker, R. (1979). SOI Leaming Abilities Test (rev. ed.). El Segundo, CA: SOI Institute.

19.

Malcolm, A. (1985, October 20). Poverty: New class of youthful poor, less educated, politically silent. New York Times, p. B5.

20.

Proctor, L. (1929). A case study of thirty superior colored children of Washington, D. C. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Chicago, IL.

21.

Shapiro, D. (1965). Neurotic styles. New York: Basic Books.

22.

Torrance, E.P. (1971). Are the Torrance tests of creative thinking biased against or in favor "of disadvantaged groups?" Gifted Child Quarterly, 15, 75-80.

23.

Washington, B.T. (1971). Up from slavery: An autobiography (rev. ed.). Williamstown, MA: Comer House Publishers .

24.

Witty, P. & Jenkins, M. (1934). The educational achievement of a group of gifted Negro children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 25, 585-597.