A rationale for interdisc plinarity as a content modification for gifted learners is presented along with assumptions underlying the implementation of an inter disciplinary model. The importance of orientation to the disciplinary fields as a precursor to interdisciplinary studies is stressed. Finally, the Interdisciplinary Concept Model, a four-step plan for developing interdisci- plinary units is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bloom, B. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans.
2.
Bruner, J.R. (1975). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
Hayes-Jacobs, H. (1981). A model for curriculum and instruction: Discipline fields, interdisciplinarity, and cognitive process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, ColumbiaUniversity.
5.
Heubner, D. (1977). Implications of psychological thought for the curriculum. In A. A. Bellack & H. M. Kleibard (Eds.). Curriculum and evaluation . Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
6.
Perkins, D.N. (1980). General cognitive skills: Why not?Paper presented at the NIE-LRDC Conference on Thinking and Learning Skills, Pittsburgh, PA.
7.
Petrie, H.G. (1976). Do you see what I see? The epistemology of interdisciplinary inquiry. AestheticEducation, 10, 29-43.
8.
Phenix, P. (1964). Realms of meaning. New York : McGraw-Hill.
9.
Renzulli, J.S. (1977). The enrichment triad model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
10.
Scheffier, I. (1976). Basic mathematical skills: Some philosophical and practical remarks. Teachers College Record, 78, 205-212.
11.
Tannenbaum, A.J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan .
