The purposes of this study were to determine whether mathematically gifted boys and girls were significantly different in cognitive abilities and personality factors and to determine whether these cognnve abilities and personality factors were accurate predictors of mathematical achievement. Mathematically gifted boys (n = 77) and girls (n = 62) completed a mathematics reasoning test (SAT-M), a verbal reasoning test (SAT-V), a measure of spatial ability (Group Embedded Figures Test), and personality test (California Psychological Inventory). They received mathematics achievement ratings depending on the number of summer courses completed. The findings indicated that boys not only have higher mathematical reasoning ability than girls, but alslo that this ability is the single best predictor of their mathematical achievement. Verbal ability is the best predictor of mathematical achievement for the girls. For both the girls and the boys, neither spatial reasoning ability nor personality factors significantly predicted mathematical achievement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
2.
Backman, M.E. (1972). Patterns of mental abilities: Ethnic, socioeconomic, and sex differences. American Educational Research Journal , 9, 1-72.
3.
Becker, B.J. (1978). The relationship of sex and spatial visualization to performance on mathematical items of the Scholastic Aptitude Test for mathematically able examinees. Unpublished Masters thesis, The Johns Hopkins University.
4.
Benbow, C.P., & Stanley, J.C. (Dec. 12, 1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact?Science, p. 4475.
5.
Benbow, C.P., & Stanley, J.C. (1982). Consequences in high school and college of sex difference in mathematical reasoning ability: A longitudinal perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 19 (4), 598-622.
6.
Benbow, C.P., & Stanley, J.C. (1983). Differential course-taking hypothesis revisited . American Educational Research Journal, 20(4), 469-474.
7.
Bennett, G.K., Seashore, H.G., & Wesman, A.G. (1974). Differential Aptitude Tests Fifth Ed. Manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation .
8.
Bieri, J., Bradburn, W.M., & Galinsky, J.D. (1958). Sex differences in perceptual behavior. Journal of Personality, 26, 1-12.
9.
Davids, A. (1966). Psychological characteristics of high school male and female potential scientists in comparison with academic underachievers . Psychology in the Schools, 3, 79-97.
10.
deWolf, V.A. (1981). High school mathematics preparation and sex differences in quantitative abilities. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5(4), 555-567.
11.
Dubuis, P.H. (1972). Scholastic Aptitude Test. In O. Buros (Ed.), The seventh mental measurements yearbook (Vol. I). Highland Park, NJ: The Gryphon Press.
12.
Fennema, E. (1980). Sex-related differences in mathematic achievement: Where and why? In L. H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin (Eds.). Women and the mathematical mystique. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J.A. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 51-71.
14.
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J.A. (1978). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement and related factors: A further study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9(3), 189-203.
15.
Fox, L.H. (1974). A mathematics program for fostering precocious achievement. In J. Stanley, D. P. Keating, & L. H. Fox (Eds.), Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
Gough, G. (1964). Academic achievement in high school as predicted from the California Psychological Inventory. Journal of Educational Psychology,65, 174-180.
17.
Guthrie, G.M. (1963). Structure of abilities in a non-Western culture . Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(2), 90-103.
18.
Haier, R., & Denham, S. (1976). A summary profile of the nonintellectual correlates of mathematical precocity in boys and girls. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), Intellectual talent: Reseach and development . Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
Harris, L.J. (1978). Sex differences in spatial ability: Possible environmental, genetic and neurological factors. In M. Kinsboume (Ed.), A symmetrical function of the brain. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Hessman, J. (1976). A spatial model for the cognitive representation of verbal algebra problems. Dissertation Abstracts International , 37, 2037A. Indiana University. Ph.D. #76-21,538.
21.
Hills, J.R. (1957). Factor analyzed abilities and success in college mathematics. Educational Psychological Measurement, 17, 615-622.
22.
Husen, T. (Ed.). (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries. New York: Wiley.
23.
Lerner, B. (Fall, 1982). American education: How are we doing?Public Interest, No. 69.
24.
Lessinger, L.M., & Martinson, R.A. (1961). The use of the California Psychological Inventory with gifted pupils. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 3, 572-575.
25.
Maccoby, E.E., & Jacklin, C.N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
26.
McGee, M.G. (1979). Human spatial abilities. New York: Praeger Publishers.
27.
Megargee, E. (1972). The California Psychological Inventory handbookSan Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Pallas, A., & Alexander, K. (1983). Sex Differences in quantitative SAT performance: New evidence on the differential coursework hypothesis. American Educational Research Journal, 20(2), 165-182.
29.
Parsons, J. E. (Ed.). (1980). The psychology of sex difference and sex roles. New York : Hemisphere Publishing Corp.
30.
Sherman, J.A. (1978). Sex related cognitive differences: An essay on theory and evidence. Springfield, Il: Charles C. Thomas.
31.
Sherman, J.A. (1967). Problem of sex differences in space perception and aspects of intellectual functioning. Psychological Review,74(4), 290-299.
32.
Sherman, J.A. (1981). Girls' and boys' enrollment in theoretical math courses: A longitudinal study. Psychology of Women Quarterly , 5(5), 681-685.
33.
Stanley, J.C. (1974). Intellectual precocity. In J. C. Stanley, D. P. Keating , & L. H. Fox (Eds.), Mathematical talent: Discovery, description and development. Baltimore : The Johns Hopkins University Press.
34.
Stanley, J.C. (June 1977). The predictive value of the SAT for brilliant seventh and eighth grades. Presentation. Educational Testing Service.
Wallace, W.L. (1972). College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test. In O. Buros (Ed.), The seventh mental measurements yearbook (Vol. I). Highland Park, NJ: The Gryphon Press.
37.
Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S.A. (1971). A Manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
