The author presents a convincing case that large-scale studies do not necessarily yield useful information for describing the phenomenon we call giftedness, or for identifying related cause-and-effect factors. Alternatives for studying gifted indivduals using methods such as case studies and single subject designs are explored and discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allport, G. (1942). The Use of Personal Documents in Psychological Science. New York: Social Science Research Council.
2.
Anton, J. (1978). Intensive experimental designs: a model for the counselor/researcher. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 56(5), 273-278.
3.
Bamberger, J. (1982). Growing up prodigies: the midlife crisis. In J. Feldhusen (Ed.). Developmental Approaches to Giftedness and Creativity, p. 1. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Borgan, B. and Taylor, G. (1975). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
6.
Bracht, G. and Glass, G. (1968). The external validity of experiments. American Educational Research Journal, 5, 437-474.
7.
Burt, C. (1961). The gifted child. British Journal of Statistical Psychology. 14, 123-139.
8.
Campbell, D. and Stanley J. (1966). Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand MacNally .
9.
Delisle, J. (1982). Striking out: suicide and the gifted adolescent . G/T/C.24(10), 16-19.
10.
Denny, T. (1978). Story telling and educational understanding. Occasional Paper (No. 12). Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo: Evaluation Center.
11.
Denzin, N. (1970). The Research Act. Chicago: Aldine.
12.
Feldman, D. (1979). Mysterious case of extreme giftedness. National Social Science EducationYearbook, 78, 335-351.
13.
Foster, W. (1980, April). Clinical Approaches to Research with the Gifted. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, Mass.
14.
Foster, W. (1984). Helping a child toward individual excellence. In J. Feldhusen (Ed.). Excellence in GiftedEducation. p. 1. Denver: Love Press.
15.
Foster, W. and Seltzer, A. (in press). A portrayal of individual excellence in the urban ghetto . Journal for Counseling and Development.
16.
Freud, S. (1955). Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy. The Standard Edition: Vol. 10. London: The Hogarth Press.
17.
Frey, D. (1978). Science and the single case in counseling research . The Personnel and Guidance Journal. 56(5), 263-268.
18.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
19.
Goertzel, W. and Goertzel, M. (1962). Cradles of Eminence. Boston : Little Brown and Co.
20.
Glasser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
21.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
22.
Gowan, J. (1960). Organization of guidance for gifted children. The Personnel and Guidance Journal. 39(4), 275-279.
23.
Gruber, H. (1981). Darwin on Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hersen, M. and Barlow, D. (1976). Single Case Experimental Designs. New York: Pergamon Press.
24.
Hollingworth, L. (1942). Children above 180 I.Q. New York: World Book Co.
25.
Kazdin, A. (1977). Methodology of applied behavior analysis. In T. Bringham and A. Catania (Eds.). Social and Instructional Processes. New York: Irvington/Naiburg— John Wiley and Sons.
26.
Kratochwell, T. (1978). Single Subject Research. New York: Academic Press.
27.
Levin, J., Marascuilo, L., and Hubert, L. (1978). N = nonparametric randomized tests. In T. Kratochwell (Ed.). Single Subject Research . New York: Academic Press.
28.
Mountour, K. (1977). William James Sidis: The broken twig. American Psychologist.32, 265-279.
29.
Piechowski, M. (1983). Self-actualization as a developmental structure . Genetic Psychology Monographs. 97.
30.
Piechowski, M. and Zaffrann, R. (1979). The Case Study approach: A Redefinition in Research and Teaching. A paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Educational Research Association, Chicago, III.
31.
Roe, A. ( 1952). A psychologist examines 64 eminent scientists. Scientific American, 32, 119-128.
32.
Rothney, J. (1968). Methods of studying the Individual Child. Waltham, Mass.: Blaisdell Publishing Co.
33.
Sisk, D. (1975). Teaching the gifted and talented teacher: a training model. Gifted Child Quarterly. 19, 81-88.
34.
Stake, R. (Speaker). (1979). Seeking Sweet Water: Case Study Methods in Educational Research (Tape). Urbana, III.: Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation. American Educational Research Association.
35.
Stoltz, S. (1976). Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy of behavior modification in a community setting. Behavior Research and Therapy. 14, 479-481.
36.
Thoresen, C. (1978). Making better science intensively. The Personnel and Guidance Journal. 56(5), 279-282.
37.
von Wright, G. (1971). Explanation and understanding. In T. Hondererich (Ed.). International Library of Philosophy and Scientific Method. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
38.
Webb, E. et al. (1981). Nonreactive Measures in Social Science . New York: Houghton Mifflin.
39.
Yin, R. ( 1982). The Case Study Strategy: an annotated bibliography. Washington: The Case Study Institute.
40.
Zaffrann, R. (1976). A Case Study Approach to an Understanding of Factors Affecting the Development of Control in Gifted and Talented Adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin - Madison .
