This investigation examined the independent and joint effects of aptitude (gifted vs. normal) and achievement (underachiever vs. achiever) on assessments of the self-system in upper elementary-aged children. The gifted group was significantly higher than the average group on self-evaluations of competence, feelings of mastery, and preference for independent decision making. The average group reported a lower level of understanding than the gifted group about the reasons for success and failure outcomes and more anxiety about school-related events. Underachievers were significantly lower than achievers on self-evaluations of performance and higher on perceptions of internal control over success and failure outcomes. Achievers were higher on perceptions of control by powerful others over outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, R.F. (1970). The behavior of students redefined. In The North Carolina advancement school: Underachievement redefined . North Carolina: State Department of Education.
2.
Bachtold, L. (1969). Personality differences among high ability underachievers . The Journal of Educational Research, 63, 16-18.
3.
Buhrmester, D. (1980). Assessing elementary-aged children's anxieties: Rationale, development, and correlates of the School Concerns Scale. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
4.
Burns, R.B. (1978). The self concept: Theory, measurement, development, and behavior. London: Longman.
5.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
Colangelo, N., & Pfegler, L.R. (1979). Academic self concept of gifted high school students . In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 188-193). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt Publications.
7.
Connell, J.P. (1981). A model of the relationships among children's self-related cognitions, affects and academic achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
8.
Connell, J.P. (in press). A new multidimensional measure of children's perceptions of control. Child Development.
9.
Cox, C.M. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Davis, H.B. (1984). Self concept profiles of gifted underachievers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester , Rochester, NY.
11.
Dean, R.S. (1977). Effects of self-concept on learning with gifted children. Journal of Educational Research, 70 (6), 315-318.
12.
Fink, M.B. (1965a). Self concept as it relates to academic underachievement . In Kornrich, M. (Ed.), Underachievement (pp. 73-78). Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
13.
Fink, M.B. (1965b). Objectification of data used in underachievement of self concept study. In M. Kornrich (Ed.), Underachievement (pp. 79-86). Springfield, IL : C. C. Thomas.
14.
French, J.L., & Carden, B.W. (1968). Characteristics of high mental ability dropouts . Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 32, 162-168.
15.
Haier, R.J., & Denham, S.A. (1976). A summary profile of the nonintellective correlates of mathematical precocity in boys and girls. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), Intellectual talent: Research and development (pp. 225-241). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
Harter, S. (1981). Intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
17.
Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53 (1), 87-97.
18.
Harter, S. (1983). Developmental perspectives on the self-system . In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (4th Ed.). New York: Wiley.
19.
Harter, S., & Connell, J.P. (1984). A model of the relationship among children's academic achievement and their self-perceptions of competence, control, and motivational orientation. In J. Nicholls (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
20.
Hildreth, G. (1966). Introduction to the gifted. New York: McGraw-Hill. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt .
21.
Kanoy, R.C. III, Johnson, B.W., & Kennedy, K.W. (1980). Locus of control and self-concept in achieving and underachieving bright elementary students. Psychology in the Schools, 17 (1), 395-399.
22.
Ketcham, R., & Snyder, R.T. (1977). Self-attitudes of the intellectually and socially advantaged student: Normative study of the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale. Psychological Reports, 40, 111-116.
23.
Kohn, M. (1977). Social competence, symptoms and underachievement in childhood: A longitudinal perspective. Washington, DC : V. H. Winston and Sons.
24.
Lehman, H. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Lightfoot, G. (1951). Personality characteristics of bright and dull children: Contributions to education no. 969. New York: Teachers College Columbia University.
26.
Lucito, L.J. (1964). Independence-conformity behavior as a function of intellect: Bright and dull children. Exceptional Children , 31, 5-13.
27.
Maddan, R., Gardner, E.F., Rudman, H.C., Karlson, B., & Merwin, J.C. (1975). Technical data report: Stanford Achieuement Test . New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich .
28.
Martinson, R. (1973). The identification of the gifted and talented . Ventura, CA: National/State Leadership Training Institute, Office of the Ventura County Superintendent .
29.
Milgram, R.M., & Milgram, N.A. (1967). Self-concept as a function of intelligence and creativity in gifted Israeli children. Psychology in the Schools , 13 (1), 91-96.
30.
Newland, I.G. (1976). The gifted in socioeducational perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Prescott, G.A. (1972). Manual for interpreting: Metropolitan Achievement Tests. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
33.
Purkey, W.W. (1966). Measured and professed personality characteristics of gifted high school students and analysis of their congruence. Journal of Educational Research, 60 (3), 99-104.
34.
Purkey, W.W. (1967). The self and academic achievement. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Education and Research Development Council. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 026 681).
35.
Ralph, J., Goldberg, M., & Passow, A.H. (1966). Bright underachievers. New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
Ringness, J.A. (1961). Self concept of children of low, average and high intelligence. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 65, 453-461.
37.
Ross, A., & Parker, M. (1980). Academic and social self-concept for the academically gifted. Exceptional Children,47, (1), 6-10.
38.
Smith, D.C. (1962). Personal and social adjustment of gifted adolescents (Research Monograph No. 4). Washington, DC: National Education Association Council for Exceptional Children .
39.
Stewart, L.H. (1959). Interest patterns of a group of high-ability, high-achieving students. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 6, 132-139.
40.
Thorndike, R.L. (1963). The concepts of over and underachievement. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
41.
Warren, J.R., & Heist, P.A. (1960). Personality attributes of gifted college students . Science, 32, 330-337.
42.
Wylie, R. (1979). The self-concept volume 2: Theory and research on selected topics. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
