Barbe, W. B. & Renzulli, J. S. (Eds.) Psychology and education of the gifted (3rd Ed.). NYC: Irvington, 1981.
2.
Gallagher, J.J.Teaching the gifted child. Boston: Alyn & Bacon, 1975.
3.
Hunt, D.E.A conceptual level matching model for coordinating learner characteristics with educational approaches. Interchange, 1970, 1, 68-81.
4.
Hunt, E.E.Matching models in education. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1974.
5.
Hunt, D.E., Butler, L.F., Noy, J., & Rosser, M.E.Assessing CL by the paragraph completion method. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education , 1978.
6.
Male, R.A., & Perrone, P.A.Identifying talented and giftedness: Part II. Roeper Review , 1979, 2, 5-8.
7.
Martinson, R.A.Identification of the gifted and talented. Ventura, CA : Office of the Superintendent of Schools, 1974.
8.
Mitchell, P.B., & Erickson, D.K.The education of gifted and talented children: A status report. Exceptional Children, 1978 , 45, 12-15.
9.
Nie, N.H., Hull, C.H., Jenkins, J.G., Steinbrenner, K., Bent, D.H.Statistical package for the social studies. NYC: McGraw-Hill , 1975.
10.
Pizzini, E.L., & Yager, R.E.The gifted science students. In N. Colangelo and R. T. Zaffrann (eds.) New uoices in counseling the gifted. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, 1979, 431-443.
11.
Post, P.B.The relationships among students'perceptions of achievement, Conceptual Level, grade level, degree of talent, and sex. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1980 . (University Microfilms No. 81-2216)
12.
Renzulli, J.S.The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing indefensible programs for the gifted and talented. Whethersfield, CT: Creative Learning Press, 1977.
13.
Rubenzer, R.Identification and evaluation procedures for gifted and talented programs . Gifted Child Quarterly, 1979, 23, 304-316.
14.
U.S. Commissioner of Education.Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1972.
