Crandall, V.C., Katkovsky, W., & Crandall, V.J.Children's beliefs in their control of reinforcements in intellectual-academic achievement situations. Child Development , 1965, 36, 91-109.
2.
Epstein, J.L., & McPartland, J.M.The concept and measurement of the quality of school life. American Educational Research Journal, 1976, 13, 15-30.
3.
Epstein, J.L., & McPartland, J.M.QSL: The quality of school life scale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1978.
4.
Evans, E.D.School and cultural activities questionnaire. (Unpublished measure). University of Washington College of Education, Seattle, Washington, 1980.
5.
Goodwin, W.L., & Driscoll, L.A.Handbook for measurement and evaluation in early childhood education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
6.
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S.Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981.
7.
Hall, G.E., & Loucks, S.F.A developmental model for determining whether the treatment is actually implemented . American Educational Research Journal, 1977 , 14, 263-276.
8.
Gallagher, J.J.Issues in education for the gifted. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and the talented: Their education and development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979, 28-44.
9.
Leinhardt, G.Program evaluation: An empirical study of individualized instruction . American Educational Research Journal, 1977,14,277-293.
10.
Leinhardt, G.Modeling and measuring educational treatment in evaluation. Review of Educational Research, 1980, 50, 393-420.
11.
Monge, R.H.Developmental trends in factors of adolescent self-concept. Developmental Psychology, 1973, 8, 382-393.
12.
Passow, A.H.Perspective on the study and education of the gifted and talented . In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and the talented: Their education and development. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1979 , 1-4.
13.
Renzulli, J.S.What we don't know about programming for the gifted and talented. Phi Delta Kappan,1980, 62, 601-602.
14.
Renzulli, J.S., & Smith, L.H.Issues and procedures in evaluating programs. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and the talented: Their education and development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979, 289-307.
15.
Ross, J.D., & Ross, C.M.Ross test of higher cognitive processes. San Rafael, CA : Academic Therapy Publications, 1976.
16.
Rossi, P.H., Freeman, H.E., & Wright, S. R. Evaluation : A systematic approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1979.
17.
Scriven, M.Goal-free evaluation. In E. R. House (Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan, 1973.
18.
Smith, R.A.Goals and programs for the education of the gifted from the perspective of evaluation. Unpublished manuscript. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, March, 1980.
19.
Soar, R.S., & Soar, R.M.An empirical analysis of selected follow-through programs: An example of a process approach to evaluation. In I. J. Gordon (Ed.), Early childhood education. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1972 , 229-260.
20.
Tremaine, C.D.Do gifted programs make a difference?Gifted Child Quarterly , 1979, 23, 500-517.
21.
Zimiles, H.A radical and regressive solution to the problem of evaluation. In L. Katz (Ed.), Current topics in early childhood education, Vol. 1. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1977.
