Bogardus, E.S.A social distance scale. Sociology and Social Research, 1933, 17, 265-271.
6.
Dean, R.S.Effects of self-concept on learning with gifted children. Journal of Educational Research, 1977, 70, 315-318.
7.
Gallagher, J.J.The influence of a special school on cognitive style and attitudes of gifted students. Springfield, IL: Illinois Department for Program Planning for the Gifted, Office of the Superintendent for Public Instruction, 1965.
Goldberg, M., Passow, A.H., & Justman, J.The effects of ability grouping. NYC: Teachers College Press, 1966.
10.
Kahn, J.V., & Garrison, M.Self-concept measurement and placement of adolescent inner-city EMR's. Training School Bulletin, 1973, 70, 80-83.
11.
Kanoy, R.C., Johnson, B.W., & Kanoy, K.W.Locus of control and self-concept in achieving and underachieving bright elementary students. Psychology in the Schools, 1980, 17, 395-399.
12.
Kirk, R.E.Experimental design procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brook-Cole Publishing, 1968.
13.
Mann, H.How real are friendships of gifted and typical children in a program of partial segregation?Exceptional Children, 1957, 23, 199-206.
14.
O'Such, K., Twyla, G., & Havertape, J.Group differences in self-concept among handicapped, normal, and gifted learners . The Humanist Educator, 1979, 18, 15-22.
15.
Piers, E.V. Manual for thePiers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale. Nashville, TN: Counselor Recordings and Tests, 1969.
16.
Piers, E.V., & Harris, D.B.Age and other correlates of self-concept in children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964, 55, 91-95.
17.
Purkey, W.W.Self-concept and school achievement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970.
18.
Renzulli, J., Hartman, R., & Callahan, C.Scale for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. In W. B. Barbe & J. S. Renzulli (Eds.), Psychology and education of the gifted . NYC: Irvington, 1975.
19.
Rodgers, B.S.Effects of an enrichment program screening process on the self-concept and others-concept of gifted elementary children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Cincinnati, 1979.
20.
Saurenman, D.A., & Michael, W.B.Differential placement of high-achieving and low achieving gifted pupils in grades four, five, and six on measures of field dependence-field independence, creativity, and self-concept. Gifted Child Quarterly, 1980, 24, 81-86.
21.
Shaw, M.C.The interrelationship of selected personality factors in high ability underachieving school children, project 58-M-1. Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Public Health, 1961.
22.
Smith, M.Attitudes and opinions of advancement class students and their parents. London, Ontario: Board of Education, 1971.
23.
Stenner, A.J., & Katzenmeyer, W.G.Self-concept development in young children. Phi Delta Kappan,1976, 58, 265-271.
24.
Stopper, C.J.The relationships of the self-concept ofgiftedand nongifted elementary school students to achievement, sex, grade level, and membership in a self-contained academic program for the gifted. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1978.
Torrance, E.P.Psychology of gifted children and youth. In W. M. Cruickshand (Ed.), Psychology of exceptional children and youth (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
27.
White, W.F.Psychosocial principles applied to classroom teaching. NYC: McGraw-Hill, 1969.
Yauman, B.E.Special education placement and the self-concepts of elementary age children . Learning Disability Quarterly, 1980, 3, 30-35.
30.
Zilli, M.G.Reasons why the gifted adolescent underachieves and some of the implications of guidance and counseling to this problem. Gifted Child Quarterly , 1971, 15, 279-292.