Myth: One program,indivisible for all!

Bloom, B.S. , & Sosniak, L.A. Talent development vs. schooling. Educational Leadership , 1981, 39 (2), 86-94.

Domino, G. Interactive effects of achievement orientation and teaching style on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology , 1971, 62, 427-431.

Epstein, H. Some biological bases of cognitive development. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 1980, 30, 46-62.

James, N.E. Personnel preference for method as a factor in leaming. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1962, 53, 43-47.

MacKinnon, D. In search of human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity . Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation, 1978.

Marland, S.P. Education of the gifted and talented (Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.

Pascal, C.E. Instructional options, option preferences, and course outcomes. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1971 ,17, 1-11.

Renzulli, J.S. The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, 1977.

Renzulli, J.S. , Reis, S.M. , & Smith, L.H. The revolving door identification model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc., 1981.

Smith, L.H. Learning styles: Measurement and educational significance (Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1976 ). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976 , 37, 4455A.

Stewart, E.D. Learning styles among gifted/talented students: preferances for instructional techniques (Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut , 1979). Dissertation Abstracts International , 1979, 40, 4503A. (University Microfilms No. 8003762)

Treffinger, D.J. Teaching for self-directed learning: A priority for the talented and gifted . The Gifted Child Quarterly, 1975, 19 (1), 46-59.

Walberg, H.J. Rasher, S.P. & Parkerson, J. Childhood and eminence. Journal of Creative Behavior , 1979, 13 (4), 225-231.