Baird, L.L.The relationship between academic ability and high level accomplishment: Academic intelligence and creativity re-examined. Princeton, NJ : Educational Testing Service, undated paper.
2.
Barron, F.Creativity and psychological health. Princeton : Van Nostrand, 1963.
3.
Bloom, B.S.Report on creativity research by the examiner's office of the University of Chicago. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. NYC: John Wiley & Sons , 1963.
4.
Cox, C.C.The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. In L. M. Terman (Ed.), Genetic studies of genius , vol. II. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1926.
5.
Creagar, J.A., & Harmon, L.R.On-the-job validation of selection variables. National Academy of Sciences-NCR , Technical Report No. 26, 1966.
6.
Crutchfield, R.S.Conformity and creative thinking. In H. W. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking. Prentice-Hall, 1962.
7.
Ghiselli, E.E.The validity of occupational selection tests. Personal Psychology , 1973, 26, 1-36.
8.
Harmon, L.R.The development of a criterion of scientific competence. In C. W. Taylor and F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity; Its recognition and development. NYC: John Wiley & Sons, 1963, 44-52.
9.
Helson, R.Women mathematicians and the creative personality. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 36, 210-20.
10.
Helson, R., & Crutchfield, R. S. Mathematicians: The creative researcher and the average Ph.D. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 1970, 34, 250-257.
11.
Hoyt, D.P.The relationship between college grades and adult achievement: A review of the literature: Iowa City: American College Testing Program Research Report No. 7, 1965.
12.
MacKinnon, D.W.Selecting students with creative potential. In P. Heist (Ed.), The creative college student: An unmet challenge . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1968, 101-116.
13.
Marston, A.R.It is time to reconsider the graduate record examination. American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 653-655.
14.
McClelland, D.C.Testing for competence rather than for 'intelligence'. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 1-14.
15.
Munday, L.A., & Davis, J.C.Varieties of accomplishment after college: Perspectives on the meaning of academic talent. Iowa City: American College Testing Program Research Report, No. 62, 1974.
16.
Reis, S.M.An Analysis of the productivity of gifted students participating in programs using the revolving door identification model. University of Connecticut, Bureau of Educational Research Report, 1981.
17.
Renzulli, J.S., Reis, S.M., & Smith, L.H.The revolving door identification model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, 1981.
18.
Wallach, M.A.Tests tell us little about talent. American Scientist , 1976, 64, 57-63.