Gifted Students’ Later Outcomes: College-Going Rates and Selectivity

Abstract

This study adds to the understanding of academic and long-term outcomes among individuals enrolled in gifted and talented (G/T) programs. Specifically, we explore postsecondary college enrollment rates and selectivity trends of G/T students in a Southern state. Using multilevel modeling, we analyzed a sample of 184,515 observations from the 2014–2019 academic years, merging data from the state Department of Education and the National Student Clearinghouse. We found that G/T students, overall, were more likely (odds ratio [OR] = 1.97) to attend any postsecondary institution than typically developing students. G/T students, compared with their typically developing peers, were 65% more likely to attend selective postsecondary institutions. These findings add to the college outcomes literature on G/T students as well as add to policy discussions surrounding higher education access for students in the heartland.

Keywords

college selectivity gifted education longitudinal research multilevel modeling multiple regression postsecondary outcomes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). What motivates students. https://www.apa.org/ed/schools/teaching-learning/top-twenty/creative-talented/motivation

Andrews

R. J.

Imberman

S. A.

Lovenheim

M. F.

(2020). Recruiting and supporting low-income, high-achieving students at flagship universities. Economics of Education Review, 74, 101923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.101923

Arcidiacono

Aucejo

Coate

Hotz

V. J.

(2014). Affirmative action and university fit: Evidence from proposition 209. IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-8997-3-7

Arkansas Department of Education. (n.d.). Gifted & talented services. Division of Learning Services. Retrieved April 27, 2024, from https://dese.ade.arkansas.gov/Offices/learning-services/gt-ap/gifted–talented-services

Assouline

S. G.

Colangelo

VanTassel-Baska

Lupkowski-Shoplik

A. E.

(Eds.). (2015). A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses that hold back America’s brightest students. The Belin-Blank Center for Gifted and Talented Education. https://www.accelerationinstitute.org/nation_empowered/Order/Default.aspx

Barron’s College Division Staff. (2015). Profiles of American colleges 2015 (31st ed.). Barron’s Educational Series.

Benbow

C. P.

Stanley

J. C.

(1996). Inequity in equity: How ‘‘equity’’ can lead to inequity for high-potential students. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 249–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.249

Bettinger

E. P.

Long

B. T.

Oreopoulos

Sanbonmatsu

(2012). The role of application assistance and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1205–1242.

Bhatt

(2009). The impacts of gifted and talented education. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1494334

10.

Black

S. E.

Cortes

K. E.

Lincove

J. A.

(2015). Academic undermatching of high-achieving minority students: Evidence from race-neutral and holistic admissions policies. American Economic Review, 105(5), 604–610. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151114

11.

Bleske-Rechek

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2004). Meeting the educational needs of special populations: Advanced placement’s role in developing exceptional human capital. Psychological Science, 15(4), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00655.x

12.

Callahan

C. M.

Moon

T. R.

(2017). Describing the status of programs for the gifted: A call for action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 20–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216686215

13.

Cameron

S. V.

Taber

(2004). Estimation of educational borrowing constraints using returns to schooling. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1), 132–182. https://doi.org/10.1086/379937

14.

College Board. (2022). AP national and state data—AP Central. https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/about-ap/ap-data-research/national-state-data

15.

Damian

R. I.

Shanahan

Trautwein

Roberts

B. W.

(2015). Can personality traits and intelligence compensate for background disadvantage? Predicting status attainment in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000024

16.

Delcourt

M. A. B.

Cornell

D. G.

Goldberg

M. D.

(2007). Cognitive and affective learning outcomes of gifted elementary school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207306320

17.

Djita

R. R.

Parra-Martinez

Wai

McKenzie

S. C.

(2023). The role of AP & concurrent courses on student postsecondary outcomes, out-of-state choice, and college selectivity. Arkansas Education Report, 20(7). https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/wordpressua.uark.edu/dist/1/555/files/2023/11/20.7-AER_AP-Concurrent.pdf

18.

Dynarski

Libassi

C. J.

Michelmore

Owen

(2018). Closing the gap: The effect of a targeted, tuition-free promise on college choices of high-achieving, low-income students (Working Paper No. 25349). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25349

19.

Feldhusen

J. F.

(2001). Talent development in gifted education. ERIC Digest E610. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education, Council for Exceptional Children, 1110 North Glebe Rd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED455657

20.

Finn

C. E.

Jr. Scanlan

A. E.

(2019) Learning in the fast lane: The past, present and future of Advanced Placement. Princeton University Press.

21.

Giancola

Kahlenberg

R. D.

(2016). True merit: Ensuring our brightest students have access to our best colleges and universities. Jack Kent Cooke Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED569948

22.

Goodman

(2016). Learning from the test: Raising selective college enrollment by providing information. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(4), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00600

23.

Graefe

A. K.

Ritchotte

J. A.

(2019). An exploration of factors that predict advanced placement exam success for gifted Hispanic students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 30(4), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X19853194

24.

Griffith

A. L.

Rothstein

D. S.

(2009). Can’t get there from here: The decision to apply to a selective college. Economics of Education Review, 28(5), 620–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.01.004

25.

Hanushek

E. A.

Ettema

(2017). Defining productivity in education: Issues and illustrations. The American Economist, 62(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0569434516688207

26.

Henfield

M. S.

Woo

Bang

N. M.

(2017). Gifted ethnic minority students and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216674556

27.

Hertberg-Davis

Callahan

C. M.

Kyburg

R. M.

(2006). Advanced placement and international baccalaureate programs: A “fit” for gifted learners? (RM06222). University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

28.

Hossler

Gallagher

K. S.

(1987). Studying student college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policymakers. College and University, 62(3), 207–221.

29.

Hox

J. J.

(2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.

30.

Hoxby

C. M.

Avery

(2012). The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low-income students (Working Paper No. 18586). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18586

31.

Kim

(2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216630607

32.

Korbey

(2020). Covering gifted education through an equity lens. Phi Delta Kappan. https://kappanonline.org/korbey-russo-covering-gifted-programs-through-an-equity-lens/

33.

Kulik

J. A.

Kulik

C. C.

(1987). Effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Equity & Excellence in Education, 23(1–2), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1066568870230105

34.

Kulik

J. A.

Kulik

C. C.

(1991). Ability grouping and gifted students. In Colangelo

Davis

G. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 178–196). Allyn & Bacon.

35.

Lakin

J. M.

Wai

(2020). Spatially gifted, academically inconvenienced: Spatially talented students experience less academic engagement and more behavioural issues than other talented students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 1015–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12343

36.

Lichten

(2000). Wither advanced placement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(29), 29. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n29.2000

37.

Liu

(2016). Applied ordinal logistic regression using stata. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878972

38.

Lohman

D. F.

(2005a). An aptitude perspective on talent: Implications for identification of academically gifted minority students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(3–4), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2005-341

39.

Lohman

D. F.

(2005b). The role of nonverbal ability tests in identifying academically gifted students: An aptitude perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(2), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900203

40.

Lovenheim

M. F.

Reynolds

C. L.

(2013). The effect of housing wealth on college choice: Evidence from the housing boom. Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.48.1.1

41.

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x

42.

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2021). Intellectual precocity: What have we learned since Terman? Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220925447

43.

Makel

M. C.

Kell

H. J.

Lubinski

Putallaz

Benbow

C. P.

(2016). When lightning strikes twice: Profoundly gifted, profoundly accomplished. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616644735

44.

McBee

(2010). Examining the probability of identification for gifted programs for students in Georgia elementary schools: A multilevel path analysis study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210377927

45.

Meyer

M. S.

Cranmore

Rinn

A. N.

Hodges

(2020). College choice: Considerations for academically advanced high school seniors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220957258

46.

National Research Council. (1995). Research-doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. National Academies Press.

47.

Office for Education Policy. (n.d.). 2022-2023 demographics data. https://oep.uark.edu/data/demographics/

48.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Corwith

(2018). Poverty, academic achievement, and giftedness: A literature review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738015

49.

Park

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences. Psychological Science, 18(11), 948–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02007.x

50.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage.

51.

Reber

Smith

(2023). College enrollment gaps: How academic preparation influences opportunity. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/2023/01/23/college-enrollment-gaps-how-academic-preparation-influences-opportunity/

52.

Redding

Grissom

J. A.

(2021). Do students in gifted programs perform better? Linking gifted program participation to achievement and nonachievement outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(3), 520–544. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737211008919

53.

Reis

S. M.

Renzulli

J. S.

(2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.012

54.

Renzulli

J. S.

(2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 246–279). Cambridge University Press.

55.

Rinn

A. N.

Bishop

(2015). Gifted adults: A systematic review and analysis of the literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215600795

56.

Rinn

A. N.

Plucker

J. A.

(2004). We recruit them, but then what? The educational and psychological experiences of academically talented undergraduates. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800106

57.

Robinson

Adelson

J. L.

Kidd

K. A.

Cunningham

C. M.

(2018). A talent for tinkering: Developing talents in children from low-income households through engineering curriculum. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738049

58.

Robinson

Cotabish

Wood

B. K.

Biggers

(2009). The Arkansas evaluation initiative in gifted education. In Renzulli

J. S.

Gubbins

E. J.

Little

(Eds.), Systems and models in gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 413–432). Creative Learning Press.

59.

Robinson

Cotabish

Wood

B. K.

O’Tuel

F. S.

(2014). The effects of a statewide evaluation initiative in gifted education on practitioner knowledge, concerns, and program documentation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(4), 349383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X14549356

60.

Sawyer

(2008). Benefits of additional high school course work and improved course performance in preparing students for college (ACT Research Report 2008-1). American College Testing. https://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/ACT_RR2008-1.pdf

61.

Stanley

J. C.

(1996). SMPY in the beginning. In Benbow

C. P.

Lubinski

(Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 225–235). Johns Hopkins University Press.

62.

Steenbergen-Hu

Makel

M. C.

Olszewski-Kubilius

(2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417

63.

Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455

64.

Stolzenberg

E. B.

Aragon

M. C.

Romo

Couch

McLennan

Eagan

M. K.

Kang

(2020). The American freshman: National norms fall 2019. Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles. https://www.heri.ucla.edu/monographs/TheAmericanFreshman2019.pdf

65.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

66.

Terman

L. M.

(1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Genetic Studies of Genius, 1.

67.

Tran

Wai

McKenzie

S. C.

Mills

J. N.

Seaton

(2020). What can we learn about improving gifted identification by studying how accurate the process is in Arkansas? Arkansas Education Reports. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/oepreport/73

68.

Tran

B. T. N.

Wai

McKenzie

S. C.

(2021). A longitudinal study of gifted status and academic growth. Office for Education Policy, University of Arkansas, Arkansas Education Report, 18(7), 1–5. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/oepreport/78/

69.

Tran

B. T. N.

Wai

McKenzie

S. C.

Mills

J. N.

Seaton

(2022). Expanding gifted identification to capture academically advanced low income and disadvantaged students: The case of Arkansas. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 45(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532211063936

70.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Table 2. Educational attainment of the population 25 years and over, by selected characteristics: 2012 [Excel file]. Current Population Survey. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2012/demo/educational-attainment/cps-detailed-tables.html

71.

U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Table 302.20: Percentage of recent high school completers enrolled in 2- and 4-year colleges, by race/ethnicity: 1960–2012 and Table 302.30: Percentage of recent high school completers enrolled in 2- and 4-year colleges, by income level: 1975–2012. National Center for Education Statistics.

72.

Wai

(2014). Experts are born, then made: Combining prospective and retrospective longitudinal data shows that cognitive ability matters. Intelligence, 45, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.08.009

73.

Wai

Allen

(2019). What boosts talent development? Examining predictors of academic growth in secondary school among academically advanced youth across 21 years. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219869042

74.

Wai

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

Steiger

J. H.

(2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 860–871. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019454

75.

Wai

Uttal

D. H.

(2018). Why spatial reasoning matters for education policy. American Enterprise Institute. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED592011

76.

Wai

Worrell

F. C.

(2020). How talented low-income kids are left behind. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(4), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720978058

77.

Warne

R. T.

(2017). Research on the academic benefits of the advanced placement program: Taking stock and looking forward. Sage Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016682996

78.

Williams

J. M.

Cholewa

(2024). Helping high-achieving, low-income, black students gain admission into America’s elite colleges: Considerations for school counselors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862231220883

79.

Wyner

J. S.

Bridgeland

J. M.

DiIulio

J. J.

Jr. (2007). Achievement trap: How America is failing millions of high-achieving students from lower-income families. Jack Kent Cooke Foundation. https://www.jkcf.org/research/achievement-trap-how-america-is-failing-millions-of-high-achieving-students-from-lower-income-families/