Academically talented students with autism, also known as twice-exceptional students with autism (2eASD), are increasingly identified in school. These students present challenges to educators who attempt to plan and implement successful instructional opportunities, as teachers’ knowledge and use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for students identified with 2eASD vary. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify current practices used by 10 high-school content and special education teachers who teach these students, as well as their recommendations for postsecondary institutions for these students. The findings suggest high-school teachers support the use of differentiated, strength-based individualized instruction for college-bound students with 2eASD, but are generally unable to offer specific examples of how these practices are implemented in their special education or content classrooms. In addition, they seldom focus on the strengths and talents of this population in their classrooms and fail to recommend competitive colleges for their consideration.
AlexanderJ. L.AyersK. M.SmithK. A. (2015). Training teachers in evidence-based practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A review of the literature. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38(1), 13–27. http://doi.org/10.1177/0888406414544551
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.).
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
4.
AssoulineS. G.Foley NicponM.DockeryL. (2012). Predicting the academic achievement of gifted students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1781–1789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1403-x
5.
AzanoA.MissettT. C.CallahanC. M.OhS.BrunnerM.FosterL.MoonT. R. (2011). Exploring the relationship between fidelity of implementation and academic achievement in a third grade gifted curriculum: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 693–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X11424878
6.
BaldwinS.CostleyD.WarrenA. (2014). Employment Activities and experiences of adults with high-functioning autism and Asperger’s disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(10), 2440–2449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2112-z
7.
Barnard-BrakL.JohnsenS. K.Pond HannigA.WeiT. (2015). The incidence of potentially gifted students within a special education population. Roeper Review, 37(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1008661
8.
BarnettJ. H.FrankelA. J.FisherK. W. (2018). Systematic review of evidence-based interventions in science for students with autism spectrum disorders. Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 53(2), 128–145. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26495265
9.
BaumS. M.CooperC. R.NeuT. W. (2001). Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38(5), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.1036
10.
BaumS. M.OwenS. V.DixonJ. (1991). To be gifted and learning disabled: From definitions to practical intervention strategies. Creative Learning Press.
11.
BaumS. M.SchaderR. M.HébertT. P. (2014). Through a different lens: Reflecting on a strengths-based, talent-focused approach for twice-exceptional learners. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(4), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214547632
12.
BaxterP.JackS. (2015). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
13.
Bottema-BeutelK.KappS. K.LesterJ. N.SassonN. J.HandB. N. (2021). Avoiding ableist language: Suggestions for autism researchers. Autism in Adulthood, 3(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2020.0014
14.
Bottema-BeutelK.MullinsT. S.HarveyM. N.GustafsonJ. R.CarterE. W. (2016). Avoiding the “brick wall of awkward”: Perspectives of youth with autism spectrum disorder on social-focused intervention practices. Autism, 20(2), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315574888
15.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
16.
BrodM.TeslerL. E.ChristensenT. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9
17.
CallahanC. M.MoonT. R.OhS.AzanoA. P.HaileyE. P. (2015). What works in gifted education: Documenting the effects of an integrated curricular/instructional model for gifted students. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 137–167. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214549448
18.
ColangeloN.AssoulineS.GrossM. (Eds.). (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. The University of Iowa.
19.
ErenandE. O.AliN. A. N. (2017). Evidence-based practice: Inclusive education for the effective implementation for children with autism. 3rd International Conference on Education, 3, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.17501/icedu.2017.3113
20.
Foley-NicponM.AllmonA.SieckB.StinsonR. D. (2011). Empirical investigation of twice-exceptionality: Where have we been and where are we going?Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210382575
21.
Foley-NicponM.AssoulineS. G.ColangeloN. (2013). Twice-exceptional learners: Who needs to know what?Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(3), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490021
22.
Foley-NicponM.KimJ. Y. C. (2018). Identifying and providing evidence-based services for twice-exceptional students. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 349–362). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_20
GavinM. K.CasaT. M.AdelsonJ. L.CarrollS. R.SheffieldL. J. (2009). The impact of advanced curriculum on the achievement of mathematically promising elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(3), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209334964
25.
GavinM. K.CasaT. M.AdelsonJ. L.CarrollS. R.SheffieldL. J.SpinelliA. M. (2007). Project M3: Mentoring mathematical minds—A research-based curriculum for talented elementary students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(4), 566–585. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2007-552
26.
GouldJ.Ashton-SmithJ. (2011). Missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis? Girls and women on the autism spectrum. Good Autism Practice, 12(1), 34–41.
27.
HsiehH. F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
28.
HugoM.HedegaardJ. (2021). Inclusion through folk high school in Sweden—the experience of young adult students with high-functioning autism. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(19), 2805–2814. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1717651
29.
IovannoneR.DunlapG.HuberH.KincaidD. (2003). Effective educational practices for students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18(3), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576030180030301
30.
JosephsonJ.WolfgangC.MehrenbergR. (2018). Strategies for supporting students who are twice-exceptional. Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 7(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.58729/2167-3454.1073
31.
KaplanS. (2013). Depth and complexity. In CallahanC. M.Hertberg-DavisH. L. (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education (pp. 277–287). Routledge.
32.
KennyL.HattersleyC.MolinsB.BuckleyC.PoveyC.PellicanoE. (2015). Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community. Autism, 20(4), 442–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315588200
33.
KimK. H.VanTassel-BaskaJ.BrackenB. A.FengA.StambaughT.BlandL. (2012). Project clarion: Three years of science instruction in title I schools among K-third grade students. Research in Science Education, 42, 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9218-5
LangR.O’ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.MachalicekW.RispoliM.ShogrenK.ChanJ. M.DavisT.LancioniG.HopkinsS. (2010). Review of teacher involvement in the applied intervention research for children with autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(2), 268–283. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879811
36.
LeeE. A. L.ScottM.BlackM. H.D’ArcyE.TanT.SheehyL.BölteS.GirdlerS. (2024). “He sees his autism as a strength, not a deficit now”: A repeated cross-sectional study investigating the impact of strengths-based programs on autistic adolescents. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 54, 1656–1671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05881-9
37.
LittleC. A.FengA. X.VanTassel-BaskaJ. (2007). A study of curriculum effectiveness in social studies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207302722
38.
MarderT.deBettencourtL. U. (2015). Teaching students with ASD using evidence-based practices: Why is training critical now?Teacher Education and Special Education, 38(1), 5–12. http://doi.org/10.1177/0888406414565838
39.
MaytonM. R.WheelerJ. J.MendezA. L.ZhangJ. (2010). An analysis of evidence-based practices in the education and treatment of learners with autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(4), 539–551. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879759
40.
McDonaldT. A.MachalicekW. (2013). Systematic review of intervention research with adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(11), 1439–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.07.015
41.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2016). Designing your study and selecting a sample. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, 67(1), 73–104.
MontgomeryD. (2015). Teaching gifted children with special educational needs: Supporting dual and multiple exceptionality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315712321
NeumeisterK. S.YsselN.BurneyV. H. (2013). The influence of primary caregivers in fostering success in twice-exceptional children. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(4), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213500068
52.
OdomS. L.Collet-KlingenberL.RogersS. J.HattonD. D. (2010). Evidence-based practices in interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(4), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459881003785506
53.
OdomS. L.CoxA. W.BrockM. E. (2013). Implementation science, professional development, and autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 79(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900207
PriyaA. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318
56.
RaoP. A.BeidelD. C.MurrayM. J. (2008). Social skills interventions for children with Asperger’s syndrome or high-functioning autism: A review and recommendations. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(2), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0402-4
57.
ReisS. M.BaumS. M.BurkeE. (2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners: Implications and applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534976
58.
ReisS. M.EckertR. D.McCoachD. B.JacobsJ. K.CoyneM. (2008). Using enrichment reading practices to increase reading fluency, comprehension, and attitudes. Journal of Educational Research, 101(5), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.5.299-315
59.
ReisS. M.GelbarN. W.MadausJ. W. (2022a). Pathways to academic success: Specific strength-based teaching and support strategies for twice exceptional high school students with autism spectrum disorder. Gifted Education International, 39(3), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294221124197
60.
ReisS. M.GelbarN. W.MadausJ. W. (2022b). Understanding the academic success of academically talented college students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52, 4426–4439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05290-4
61.
ReisS. M.McCoachD. B.CoyneM.SchreiberF. J.EckertR. D.GubbinsE. J. (2007). Using planned enrichment strategies with direct instruction to improve reading fluency, comprehension, and attitude toward reading: An evidence-based study. The Elementary School Journal, 108(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/522383
62.
ReisS. M.McCoachD. B.LittleC. M.MullerL. M.KaniskanR. B. (2011). The effects of differentiated instruction and enrichment pedagogy on reading achievement in five elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 462–501. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210382891
63.
ReisS. M.PetersP. M. (2021). Research on the Schoolwide Enrichment Model: Four decades of insights, innovation, and evolution. Gifted Education International, 37(2), 109–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420963987
64.
RenzulliJ. S.GubbinsE. J.McMillenK. S.EckertR. D.LittleC. A. (2009). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (2nd ed.). Prufrock Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673581
65.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1997). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. Prufrock Press.
66.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (2014). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A how-to-guide for talent development. Prufrock Press.
67.
RobinsonA.SteinM. K. (2013). Evidence-based practice model and response to intervention for students with gifts and talents. In ColemanM. R.JohnsenS. K. (Eds.), Implementing RtI with gifted students (pp. 101–119). Prufrock Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003235736-8
68.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
69.
SamA. M.CoxA. W.SavageM. N.WatersV.OdomS. L. (2019). Disseminating information on evidence-based practices for children and youth with autism spectrum disorder: AFIRM. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50, 1931–1940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03945-x
SimpsonL. (2005). Evidence-based practices and students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(3), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576050200030201
73.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
74.
SteinbrennerJ. R.HumeK.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yücesoy-ÖzkanS.SavageM. N. (2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team. https://cidd.unc.edu/Registry/news/docs/EBPReport2020.pdf
75.
TerryG.HayfieldN.ClarkeV.BraunV. (2017). Thematic analysis. In WilligC.RogersW. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 17–37). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n2
76.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.BrownE. F. (2007). Toward best practice: An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207306323
77.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.FengA. X.SwansonJ. D.QuekC.ChandlerK. (2009). Academic and affective profiles of low-income, minority, and twice-exceptional gifted learners: The role of gifted program membership in enhancing self. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(4), 702–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X0902000406
78.
VasileiouK.BarnettJ.ThorpeS.YoungT. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
79.
WangC. W.NeihartM. (2015). Academic self-concept and academic self-efficacy: Self-beliefs enable academic achievement of twice-exceptional students. Roeper Review, 37(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1008660
80.
WestE. A.McCollowM.KidwellJ.UmbargerG.CoteD. L. (2013). Current status of evidence-based practice for students with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(4), 443–455. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24232502
81.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.BrockM. E.PlavnickJ. B.FleuryV. P.SchultzT. R. (2014). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group. http://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/sites/autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/files/2014-EBP-Report.pdf
82.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.BrockM. E.PlavnickJ. B.FleuryV. P.SchultzT. R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1951–1966. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z
83.
WuI. C.LoC. O.TsaiK. F. (2019). Learning experiences of highly able learners with ASD: Using a success case method. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(3), 216–242. http://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219855681
84.
YatesD.BoddisonA. (2020). The school handbook for dual and multiple exceptionality: High learning potential with special educational needs or disabilities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429352041
85.
YinR. K.CampbellD. T. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
