Even when achievement outcomes are equal, some students of color still do not participate in advanced academic or gifted education programs. To better understand this phenomenon, researchers engaged in a research-practice partnership within the local community to explore the experiences of families of color and assess their needs pertaining to advanced learning opportunities for their children. Data were collected during two family outreach events using a semi-structured interview protocol with focus groups. Focus-group interviews were independently coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings revealed challenges and barriers related to accessing enrichment and advanced academic learning opportunities. Some families discussed their personal experiences of racism, bias, and deficit thinking. Overall, themes illustrated how families of color believed they were perceived by educational practitioners and their desire for a sense of belonging and equitable access to high-quality academic programming for their children.
AllenQ.White-SmithK. (2017). “That’s why I say stay in school”: Black mothers’ parental involvement, cultural wealth, and exclusion in their son’s schooling. Urban Education, 53(3), 409–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917714516
Barbieri-AriezagaC.Miller-CottoD. (2021). The importance of adolescent’s sense of belonging to mathematics for algebra learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 87, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.101993
9.
BarlowK.DunbarE. (2010). Race, class, and Whiteness in gifted and talented identification: A case study. Berkeley Review of Education, 1(1), 63–85. http://escholarship.org/uc/ucbgse_bre
BernsteinB. O.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2021). Academic acceleration in gifted youth and fruitless concerns regarding psychological well-being: A 35-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 830–845. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000500
12.
BertrandM.FreelonR.RogersJ. (2018). Elementary principals’ social construction of parents of color and working-class parents: Disrupting or reproducing conflicting and deficit orientations of education policy?Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(102), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3546
BookerK. (2016). Connection and commitment: How sense of belonging and classroom community influence degree persistence for African American undergraduate women. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(2), 218–229. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
BroomsD. R. (2019). “I was just trying to make it”: Examining urban Black males’ sense of belonging, schooling experiences, and academic success. Urban Education, 54(6), 804–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208591664874
CardD.GiulianoL. (2016). Universal screening increases the representation of low-income and minority students in gifted education. PNAS, 113(48), 13678–13683. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605043113
19.
CastroM.Expósito-CasasE.López-MartínE.LizasoainL.Navarro-AsencioE.GaviriaJ. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.01.002
20.
ChapmanT. K.BhopalK. (2013). Countering common-sense understandings of ‘good parenting’: Women of color advocating for their children. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 16(4), 562–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2013.817773
CoburnC. E.PenuelW. R.GeilK. E. (2013). Research-practice partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. William T. Grant Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED568396
24.
CotabishA.RobinsonA. (2012). The effects of peer coaching on the evaluation knowledge, skills, and concerns of gifted program administrators. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212446861
25.
DavisJ. L.FordD. Y.MooreJ. L.IIIFloydE. F. (2020). Black and gifted in rural America: Barriers and facilitators to accessing gifted and talented education programs. Theory & Practice in Rural Education, 10(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862221106463
26.
DixsonA. D.Rousseau-AndersonC. (2018). Where are we? Critical race theory in education 20 years later. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1403194
27.
DottererA. M. (2022). Parent involvement, expectancy values, and STEM outcomes among underrepresented adolescents. Social Psychology of Education, 25, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09677-0
Ecker-LysterM.NiilekselaC. (2017). Enhancing gifted education for underrepresented students: Promising recruitment and programming strategies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216686216
30.
EmbrickD. G.MooreW. L. (2020). White space(s) and the reproduction of White supremacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(14), 1935–1945. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220975053
31.
ErwinJ. O.WorrellF. C. (2012). Assessment practices and the underrepresentation of minority students in gifted and talented education. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911428197
Fields-SmithC.WilliamsM. (2009). Motivations, sacrifices, and challenges: Black parents’ decisions to home school. Urban Review, 41, 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-008-0114-x
34.
FordD. Y.GranthamT. C.WhitingG. W. (2008). Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029080740030
35.
FordD. Y.HarrisJ. J.IIITysonC. A.TrotmanM. F. (2001). Beyond deficit thinking: Providing access for gifted African American students. Roeper Review, 24(2), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190209554129
36.
FordD. Y.KingR. A.Jr. (2014). No Blacks allowed: Segregated gifted education in the context of Brown v. Board of Education. The Journal of Negro Education, 83(3), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.83.3.0300
FordD. Y.WhitingG. W. (2008). Recruiting and retaining underrepresented gifted students. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_15
Garces-BacsalR. M.ElhowerisH. (2022). Decentering Whiteness in gifted education: Addressing the needs of the gifted “others” through social justice and culturally responsive pedagogies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211037713
41.
GatwiriK.AndersonL. (2020). Parenting Black children in White spaces: Skilled African migrants reflect on their parenting experiences in Australia. Child & Family Social Work, 26(1), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12799
GranthamT. C.FordD. Y.DavisJ. L.Trotman-ScottM. F.DicksonK.TaradashG.WhitingG. W.CottonC. B.FloydE. F.CollinsK. H.AndersonB. N.FoxS.RobersonJ. J. (2020). Get your knee off our necks: Black scholars speak out to confront racism against Black students in gifted and talented education. The Consortium for Inclusion of Underrepresented Racial Groups in Gifted Education (I-URGGE).
44.
GrissomJ. A.ReddingC. (2016). Discretion and disproportionality: Explaining the underrepresentation of high-achieving students of color in gifted programs. AERA Open, 2(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415622175
45.
GummadamP.PittmanL. D.LoffeM. (2015). School belonging, ethnic identity, and psychological adjustment among ethnic minority college students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(2), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1048844
46.
HarrisC. I. (1995). Whiteness as property. In CrenshawK.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 276–291). The New Press.
HenrickE. C.CobbP.PenuelW. R.JacksonK.ClarkT. (2017). Assessing research-practice partnerships: Five dimensions of effectiveness. William T. Grant Foundation.
49.
HertzogN. B.LambK. N.MammadovS. (2021). Parent perspectives on sending their children to college early. Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(4), 399–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211007088
50.
HilliardA.III. (1991). Do we have the will to educate all children?Educational Leadership, 49(1), 31–36.
51.
HodgesJ.TayJ.MaedaY.GentryM. (2018). A meta-analysis of gifted and talented identification practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752107
52.
HornC. V. (2015). Young scholars: A talent development model for finding and nurturing potential in underserved populations. Gifted Child Today, 38(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514556632
53.
HowardJ. (2018). The White kid can do whatever he wants: The racial socialization of a gifted education program. Educational Studies, 54(5), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2018.1453512
54.
HyltonK. (2012). Talk the talk, walk the walk: Defining critical race theory in research. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 15(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.638862
55.
IsikU.El TahirO.MeeterM.HeymansM. W.JansmaE. P.CroisetG.KusurkarR. A. (2018). Factors influencing academic motivation of ethnic minority students: A review. SAGE Open, 8(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018785412
56.
JeffriesR.SilvernailL. (2017). Barriers to Black student enrollment in honors and advanced placement courses. The Negro Educational Review, 68(1–4), 56–79.
57.
JeynesW. H. (2017). A meta-analysis: The relationship between parental involvement and Latino student outcomes. Education and Urban Society, 49, 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124516630596
58.
JohnsenS. J. (2011). Identifying gifted students: A practical guide. Prufrock Press.
59.
JollyJ. L.MatthewsM. S. (2012). A critique of the literature on parenting gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35, 259–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212451703
60.
KanayaT.WaiJ.MirandaB. (2019). Exploring the links between receiving special education and adulthood outcomes. Frontiers in Education, 4(56), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00056
61.
LakinJ. M. (2016). Universal screening and the representation of historically underrepresented minority students in gifted education: Minding the gaps in Card and Giuliano’s research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X16630348
62.
LambK. N.BoedekerP.KettlerT. (2019). Inequities of enrollment in gifted education: A statewide application of the 20% equity allowance formula. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63, 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219830768
63.
LeeL. E.OttweinJ. K.PetersS. (2020). Eight universal truths of identifying students for advanced academic intervention. In RobinsJ. H.JollyJ. L.KarnesF. A.BeanS. M. (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (5th ed., pp. 61–79). Routledge.
64.
LeechN. L.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557
65.
MaX.ShenJ.KrennH. Y.HuS.YuanJ. (2015). A meta-analysis of the relationship between learning outcomes and parental involvement during childhood education and early elementary education. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 771–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9351-1
66.
MakelM. C. (2022). Additional challenges to achieving equity in gifted and talented education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 101–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211039735
67.
McBeeM. T. (2006). A descriptive analysis of referral sources for gifted identification screening by race and socioeconomic status. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2006-686
68.
McBeeM. T. (2010). Examining the probability of identification for gifted programs for students in Georgia elementary schools: A multilevel path and analysis study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210377927
69.
MunR. U.EzzaniM. D.LeeL. E. (2020). Culturally relevant leadership in gifted education: A systematic review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 43(2), 108–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353220912009
70.
MunR. U.EzzaniM. D.YeungG. (2021). Parent engagement in identifying and serving diverse gifted students: What is the role of leadership?Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(4), 533–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211021836
71.
MunR. U.HemmlerV.Langley-DulongS.WareS.GubbinsJ. E.CallahanC. M.McCoachD. B.SiegleD. (2020). Identifying and serving English learners in gifted education: Looking back and moving forward. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 43(4), 297–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353220955230
PasqueP. A.PattonL. D.GaylesJ. G.GoodenM. A.HenfieldM. S.MilnerH. R.IVPetersA.StewartD. L. (2022). Unapologetic educational research: Addressing anti-blackness, racism, and White supremacy. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 22(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086211060451
74.
PetersS. J. (2022a). The challenges of achieving equity within public school gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211002535
PetersS. J.GentryM.WhitingG. W.McBeeM. T. (2019). Who gets served in gifted education? Demographic representation and a call for action. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219833738
77.
PetersS. J.Rambo-HernandezK.MakelM. C.MatthewsM. S.PluckerJ. A. (2019). Effect of local norms on racial and ethnic representation in gifted education. AERA Open, 5(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419848446
Posey-MaddoxL.Haley-LockA. (2020). One size does not fit all: Understanding parent engagement in the contexts of work, family, and public schooling. Urban Education, 55(5), 671–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916660348
RomeroA. J.GonzalezH.SmithB. A. (2015). Qualitative exploration of adolescent discrimination: Experiences and responses of Mexican American parents and teens. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-9957-9
83.
SaldañaJ. (2014). Coding and analysis strategies. In LeavyP. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (1st ed., pp. 1–45). Oxford University Press.
84.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
85.
SewellC. J. P.GoingsR. B. (2019). Navigating the gifted bubble: Black adults reflecting on their transition experiences in NYC gifted programs. Roeper Review, 41(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1553218
TarasawaB.WaggonerJ. (2015). Increasing parental involvement of English language learner families: What the research says. Journal of Children and Poverty, 21(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10796126.2015.1058243
88.
TysonK. (2011). Integration interrupted: Tracking, Black students, and acting White after Brown. Oxford University Press.
WorrellF. C.DixsonD. D. (2018). Recruiting and retaining underrepresented gifted students. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (2nd ed., pp. 209–226). Springer.
WrightB. L.FordD. Y.YoungJ. L. (2017). Ignorance or indifference? Seeking excellence and equity for under-represented students of color in gifted education. Global Education Review, 4(1), 45–60. https://ger.mercy.edu/index.php/ger/article/view/290
YullD.BlitzL. V.ThompsonT.MurrayC. (2014). Can we talk? Using community-based participatory action research to build family and school partnerships with families of color. School Community Journal, 24(2), 9–31. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1048538.pdf
99.
YullD.WilsonM.MurrayC.ParhamL. (2018). Reversing the dehumanization of families of color in schools: Community-based research in a race-conscious parent engagement program. School Community Journal, 28(1), 319–347. http://www.schoolcommunitynetwork.org/SCJ.aspx
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
