Perspectives of Parents of Highly and Profoundly Gifted Children Regarding Competence,Belonging,and Support Within a Sociocultural Context

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative, phenomenological study was to investigate the experiences and perspectives of parents of highly and profoundly gifted children in developmental and cultural contexts. A purposive sample was selected from parents who are members of networks and organizations serving highly and profoundly gifted students. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 parents. Data were analyzed using the six-step approach of thematic analysis and revealed eight overarching themes including (a) self-efficacy within sociocultural contexts; (b) feelings of confidence; (c) role in fulfilling children’s needs; (d) decisions and actions related to children’s giftedness; (e) development of the parent/child dyads; (f) sense of belonging within the larger community; (g) impact of Covid-19 pandemic on their child’s gifted education; and (h) resources needed to facilitate children’s social-emotional and academic needs. Implications inform educators, counselors, and communities of the lived experiences of parents and their need for a sense of support and belonging.

Keywords

qualitative phenomenology parenting culture developmental stage highly to profoundly gifted

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alsop

(2003). Asynchrony: Intuitively valid and theoretically reliable. Roeper Review, 25(3), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554213

Ardelt

Eccles

J. S.

(2001). Effects of mothers’ parental efficacy beliefs and promotive parenting strategies on inner-city youth. Journal of Family Issues, 22(8), 944–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251301022008001

Auerbach

(2007). From moral supporters to struggling advocates: Reconceptualizing parent roles in education through the experience of working class families of color. Urban Education, 42(3), 250–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085907300433

Bandura

(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bandura

(1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122

Benner

A. D.

Boyle

A. E.

Sadler

(2016). Parental involvement and adolescents’ educational success: The roles of prior achievement and socioeconomic status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0431-4

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun

Clarke

Boulton

Davey

McEvoy

(2020). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550

Bronfenbrenner

(2001). The bioecological theory of human development. In Smelser

N. J.

Baltes

P. B.

(Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioural sciences (pp. 6963–6970). Elsevier.

10.

Bronfenbrenner

(Ed.). (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Sage.

11.

Bucholtz

(2007). The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1439–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00094-6

12.

Candela

A. G.

(2019). Exploring the function of member checking. The Qualitative Report, 24(3), 619–628. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3726

13.

Chellapan

Margrain

(2013). If you talk, you’re just talking. If I talk is that bragging: Perspectives of parents of young gifted children in New Zealand. APEX: The New Zealand Journal of Gifted Education, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21307/apex-2013-002

14.

Clarke

Braun

Hayfield

(2015). Thematic analysis. In Smith

J. A.

(Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 222–248). Sage.

15.

Creswell

J. W.

Poth

C. N.

(2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

16.

Cross

(2015). Clinical and mental health issues in counseling the gifted individual. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00192.x

17.

Dedoose. (2022). Home. https://www.dedoose.com/

18.

Duquette

Orders

Fullarton

Robertson-Grewal

(2011). Fighting for their rights: Advocacy experiences of parents of children identified with intellectual giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(2), 488–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321103400306

19.

Foley-Nicpon

Assouline

S. G.

Stinson

R. D.

(2012). Cognitive and academic distinctions between gifted students with autism and Asperger syndrome. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986211433199

20.

Ford

D. Y.

(2011). Multicultural gifted education. Prufrock Press.

21.

Freeman

(2017). Modes of thinking for qualitative data analysis. Routledge.

22.

Garn

A. C.

Matthews

M. S.

Jolly

J. L.

(2012). Parents’ role in the academic motivation of students with gifts and talents. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 656–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21626

23.

Gibauhd-Walsten

Wanderson

L. P.

(1978, August 24). Development and utility of the parenting sense of competence scale [Paper presentation]. American Psychological Association 86th Annual Convention, Toronto, ON, Canada.

24.

Grantham

T. C.

Frasier

M. M.

Roberts

A. C.

Bridges

E. M.

(2005). Parent advocacy for culturally diverse students. Theory Into Practice, 44(1), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4402_8

25.

Gross

M. U. M.

(2004). Exceptionally gifted children. Routledge.

26.

Guba

E. G.

(1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(1), 75–91.

27.

Guthrie

K. H.

(2019). “Nothing is ever easy”: Parent perceptions of intensity in their gifted adolescent children. The Qualitative Report, 24(8), 2090–2101. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3598

28.

Hertzog

N. B.

Bennett

(2004). In whose eyes: Parents’ perspectives on the learning needs of their gifted children. Roeper Review, 26(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554249

29.

Hodge

K. A.

Kemp

C. R.

(2006). Recognition of giftedness in the early years of school: Perspectives of teachers, parents, and children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 164–204. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2006-259

30.

Hollingworth

L. S.

(1926). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. MacMillan.

31.

Hollingworth

L. S.

(1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet: Origin and development. World Book.

32.

Huey

E. L.

Sayler

M. F.

Rinn

A. N.

(2013). Effects of family functioning and parenting style on early entrants’ academic performance and program completion. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(4), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213506066

33.

Huff

R. E.

Housekamp

B. M.

Watkins

A. V.

Stanton

Tavegia

(2005). The experiences of parents of African American children: A phenomenological study. Roeper Review, 27(4), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190509554321

34.

Johnston

Mash

E. J.

(1989). A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1802_8

35.

Jolly

J. L.

Matthews

M. S.

(2012). A critique of the literature on parenting gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(3), 259–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212451703

36.

Jolly

J. L.

Matthews

M. S.

Nester

(2013). Homeschooling the gifted: A parent’s perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212469999

37.

Jones

T. L.

Prinz

R. J.

(2005). Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent child adjustment. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(3), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.12.004

38.

Karpinski

R. I.

Kinase Kolb

A. M.

Tetreault

N. A.

Borowski

T. B.

(2018). High intelligence: A risk factor for psychological and physiological overexcitabilities. Intelligence, 66, 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.09.001

39.

Kerr

Sodano

(2003). Career assessment with intellectually gifted students. Journal of Career Assessment, 11(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072703011002004

40.

Koshy

Brown

Jones

Smith

C. P.

(2013). Exploring the views of parents of high ability children living in relative poverty. Educational Research, 55(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.825167

41.

Koshy

Portman Smith

Brown

(2017). Parenting “gifted and talented” children in urban areas: Parents’ voices. Gifted Education International, 33(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429414535426

42.

Kuckartz

(2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice, and using software. Sage.

43.

Kuczynski

Pitman

Ta-Young

Harach

(2016). Children’s influence on their parents’ adult development: Mothers’ and fathers’ receptivity to children’s request for change. Journal of Adult Development, 23(4), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-016-9235-8

44.

Lee

K. M.

Olenchak

F. R.

(2015). Individuals with a gifted/attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis: Identification, performance, outcomes, and interventions. Gifted Education International, 31(3), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429414530712

45.

Levy

Plucker

(2003). Theory and practice: Assessing the psychological presentation of gifted and talented clients: A multicultural perspective. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 16(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070310001610100

46.

Lockhart

Meyer

M. S.

Crutchfield

(2022). A content analysis of state plans for gifted and talented education. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211026240

47.

Lubinski

(2016). From Terman to today: A century of findings on intellectual precocity. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 900–944. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675476

48.

Lubinski

Webb

R. M.

Morelock

M. J.

Benbow

C. P.

(2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A ten-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 718–729. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.4.718

49.

Makel

M. C.

Kell

H. J.

Lubinski

Putallaz

Benbow

C. P.

(2016). When lightning strikes twice: Profoundly gifted, profoundly accomplished. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616644735

50.

Marland

S. P.

Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to the U.S. Office of Education (Government Documents, Y4.L 11/2: G: 36) (Vol.1). U.S. Government Printing Office.

51.

Mate

Y. B.

(2009). What are extraordinary gifted children like (equal to or above 189 IQ): A study of 10 cases. Gifted and Talented International, 24(2), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2009.11673532

52.

Matthews

M. S.

Ritchotte

J. A.

Jolly

J. L.

(2014). What’s wrong with giftedness: Parents’ perceptions of the gifted label. International Studies of Sociology in Education, 24(4), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2014.990225

53.

Matthews

M. S.

Shaunessy

(2010). Putting standards into practice: Evaluating the utility of the NAGC pre-K—Grade 12 gifted program standards. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209356708

54.

McBee

M. T.

Shaunessy

Matthews

M. S.

(2012). Policy matters: An analysis of district-level efforts to increase the identification of underrepresented learners. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(4), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X12463511

55.

McHugh

M. L.

(2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb), 22(3), 276–282.

56.

McNamara

(2009). General guidelines for conducting interviews. Authenticity Consulting.

57.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

58.

Morawska

Sanders

M. R.

(2008). Parenting gifted and talented children: What are the key child behavior and parenting issues. Psychiatry, 42(9), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048670802277271

59.

Morawska

Sanders

M. R.

(2009). Parenting gifted and talented children: Conceptual and empirical foundations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209334962

60.

Moritz Rudasill

Adelson

J. L.

Callahan

C. M.

Vogt Houlihan

Keizer

B. M

. (2013). Gifted students’ perceptions of parenting styles: Associations with cognitive ability, sex, race, and age. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212460886

61.

Mun

Hertzog

(2019). The influence of parental and self-expectations on Asian American women who entered college early. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(2), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218823559

62.

Noble

Smith

(2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(2), 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102054

63.

Nowell

L. S.

Norris

J. M.

White

D. E.

Moules

N. J.

(2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

64.

Ohan

J. L.

Leung

D. W.

Johnston

(2000). The parenting sense of competence scale: Evidence of a stable factor structure and validity. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32(4), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087122

65.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Lee

S.-Y.

Ngoi

(2004). Addressing the achievement gap between minority and nonminority children by increasing access to gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(2), 127–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320402800202

66.

Papadopoulos

(2021). Parenting the exceptional social-emotional needs of gifted and talented children: What do we know? Children, 8(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8110953

67.

Peebles

J. L.

Mendaglio

McCowan

(2023). The experience of parenting gifted children: A thematic analysis of interviews with parents of elementary-age children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 67(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862221120418

68.

Peters

S. J.

Engerrand

(2016). Equity and excellence: Proactive efforts in the identification of underrepresented students for gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216643165

69.

Peterson

J. S.

(2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 280–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346946

70.

Peterson

J. S.

(2014). Giftedness, trauma, and development: A qualitative, longitudinal case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(4), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214552564

71.

Porath

(2007). The conceptual underpinnings of giftedness: Development and educational implications. High Ability Studies, 17(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130601121268

72.

Porter

(2005). Gifted young children: A guide for teachers and parents. Allen & Unwin.

73.

Renati

Bonfiglio

N. S.

Dilda

Mascia

M. L.

Penna

M. P.

(2023). Gifted children through the eyes of their parents: Talents, social-emotional challenges, and educational strategies from preschool through middle school. Children, 10(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010042

74.

Renati

Bonfiglio

N. S.

Pfeiffer

(2017). Challenges raising a gifted child: Stress and resilience factors within the family. Gifted Education International, 33(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416650948

75.

Rinn

A. N.

(2020). Social, emotional, and psychosocial development of gifted and talented individuals. Prufrock Press.

76.

Rinn

A. N.

Mun

R. U.

Hodges

(2022). 2020-2021 state of the states in gifted education. National Association of Gifted Children and Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. https://nagc.org/page/state-of-the-states-report

77.

Roulston

(2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. Sage.

78.

Rubenstein

L. D.

Schelling

Wilczynski

S. M.

Hooks

E. N.

(2015). Lived experiences of parents of gifted students with autism spectrum disorder: The struggle to find appropriate educational experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215592193

79.

Ruff

D. L.

(2021). How parental viewpoint and personality affect gifted child outcomes. Gifted Education International, 37(1), 80–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420946072

80.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.

81.

Saranli

A. G.

(2017). Research on coping methods and support systems of parents of gifted children in Turkey. Journal of Education and Future, 11(1), 1–13.

82.

Schultz

R. A.

(2018). Recognizing the outliers: Behaviors and tendencies of the profoundly gifted learner in mixed-ability classrooms. Roeper Review, 40(3), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1469068

83.

Shavinina

L. V.

(1999). The psychological essence of the child prodigy phenomenon: Sensitive periods and cognitive experience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629904300104

84.

Shenton

A. K.

(2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201

85.

Silverman

L. K.

(1997). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.1997.9681865

86.

Silverman

L. K.

Kearney

(1989). Parents of the extraordinarily gifted. Advanced Development, 1(1), 41–56.

87.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2007). Cultural dimensions of giftedness and talent: Cultural conceptions of giftedness. Roeper Review, 29(3), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190709554404

88.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2012). A proposed direction forward for gifted education based on psychological science. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212456079

89.

Tan

C. Y.

(2019). Involvement practices, socioeconomic status, and student science achievement: Insights from a typology of home and school involvement patterns. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 899–924. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218807146

90.

Terman

L. M.

(1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford University Press.

91.

Terrassier

J. C.

(1985). Dyssynchrony: Uneven development. In Freeman

(Ed.), The psychology of gifted children (pp. 265–274). Wiley.

92.

Toper

D. R.

Keane

S. P.

Shelton

T. L.

Calkins

S. D.

(2010). Parent involvement and student academic performance: A multiple mediational analysis. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 38(3), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2010.486297

93.

Tracy

S. J.

(2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org10.1177/1077800410383121

94.

Turner

D. W.

III . (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754–760.

95.

Vagel

(2014). Crafting phenomenological research. Routledge.

96.

Velez-Agosto

Soto-Crespo

Vizzcarrondo-Oppenheimer

Vega-Molina

Coll

(2017). Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory revision: Moving culture from the macro into the micro. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617704397

97.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

98.

Webb

J. T.

Amend

E. R.

Webb

N. E.

Goerss

Beljan

Olenchak

F. R.

(2005). Misdiagnosis and dual diagnoses of gifted children and adults: ADHD, bipolar, OCD, Asperger’s, Depression, and other disorders. Great Potential Press.

99.

Wellisch

(2021). Parenting with eyes wide open: Young gifted children, early entry and social isolation. Gifted Education International, 37(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429419899946

100.

Willis

D. G.

Sullivan-Bolyai

Knaff

Cohen

M. Z.

(2016). Distinguishing features and similarities between descriptive and phenomenological and qualitative description research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 38(9), 1185–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945916645499

101.

Zhang

Jiang

Ming

Ren

Wang

Huang

(2020). Family socio-economic status and children’s academic achievement: The different roles of parental involvement and subjective social mobility. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12374

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB