The purpose of this qualitative, phenomenological study was to investigate the experiences and perspectives of parents of highly and profoundly gifted children in developmental and cultural contexts. A purposive sample was selected from parents who are members of networks and organizations serving highly and profoundly gifted students. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 parents. Data were analyzed using the six-step approach of thematic analysis and revealed eight overarching themes including (a) self-efficacy within sociocultural contexts; (b) feelings of confidence; (c) role in fulfilling children’s needs; (d) decisions and actions related to children’s giftedness; (e) development of the parent/child dyads; (f) sense of belonging within the larger community; (g) impact of Covid-19 pandemic on their child’s gifted education; and (h) resources needed to facilitate children’s social-emotional and academic needs. Implications inform educators, counselors, and communities of the lived experiences of parents and their need for a sense of support and belonging.
ArdeltM.EcclesJ. S. (2001). Effects of mothers’ parental efficacy beliefs and promotive parenting strategies on inner-city youth. Journal of Family Issues, 22(8), 944–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251301022008001
3.
AuerbachS. (2007). From moral supporters to struggling advocates: Reconceptualizing parent roles in education through the experience of working class families of color. Urban Education, 42(3), 250–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085907300433
BennerA. D.BoyleA. E.SadlerS. (2016). Parental involvement and adolescents’ educational success: The roles of prior achievement and socioeconomic status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0431-4
BraunV.ClarkeV.BoultonE.DaveyL.McEvoyC. (2020). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
9.
BronfenbrennerU. (2001). The bioecological theory of human development. In SmelserN. J.BaltesP. B. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioural sciences (pp. 6963–6970). Elsevier.
10.
BronfenbrennerU. (Ed.). (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Sage.
ChellapanL.MargrainV. (2013). If you talk, you’re just talking. If I talk is that bragging: Perspectives of parents of young gifted children in New Zealand. APEX: The New Zealand Journal of Gifted Education, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21307/apex-2013-002
14.
ClarkeV.BraunV.HayfieldN. (2015). Thematic analysis. In SmithJ. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 222–248). Sage.
15.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
16.
CrossJ.CrossT. (2015). Clinical and mental health issues in counseling the gifted individual. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00192.x
DuquetteC.OrdersS.FullartonS.Robertson-GrewalK. (2011). Fighting for their rights: Advocacy experiences of parents of children identified with intellectual giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(2), 488–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321103400306
19.
Foley-NicponM.AssoulineS. G.StinsonR. D. (2012). Cognitive and academic distinctions between gifted students with autism and Asperger syndrome. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986211433199
20.
FordD. Y. (2011). Multicultural gifted education. Prufrock Press.
21.
FreemanM. (2017). Modes of thinking for qualitative data analysis. Routledge.
22.
GarnA. C.MatthewsM. S.JollyJ. L. (2012). Parents’ role in the academic motivation of students with gifts and talents. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 656–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21626
23.
Gibauhd-WalstenJ.WandersonL. P. (1978, August24). Development and utility of the parenting sense of competence scale [Paper presentation]. American Psychological Association 86th Annual Convention, Toronto, ON, Canada.
24.
GranthamT. C.FrasierM. M.RobertsA. C.BridgesE. M. (2005). Parent advocacy for culturally diverse students. Theory Into Practice, 44(1), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4402_8
25.
GrossM. U. M. (2004). Exceptionally gifted children. Routledge.
26.
GubaE. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(1), 75–91.
27.
GuthrieK. H. (2019). “Nothing is ever easy”: Parent perceptions of intensity in their gifted adolescent children. The Qualitative Report, 24(8), 2090–2101. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3598
28.
HertzogN. B.BennettT. (2004). In whose eyes: Parents’ perspectives on the learning needs of their gifted children. Roeper Review, 26(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554249
29.
HodgeK. A.KempC. R. (2006). Recognition of giftedness in the early years of school: Perspectives of teachers, parents, and children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 164–204. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2006-259
30.
HollingworthL. S. (1926). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. MacMillan.
31.
HollingworthL. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet: Origin and development. World Book.
32.
HueyE. L.SaylerM. F.RinnA. N. (2013). Effects of family functioning and parenting style on early entrants’ academic performance and program completion. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(4), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213506066
33.
HuffR. E.HousekampB. M.WatkinsA. V.StantonM.TavegiaB. (2005). The experiences of parents of African American children: A phenomenological study. Roeper Review, 27(4), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190509554321
34.
JohnstonC.MashE. J. (1989). A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1802_8
35.
JollyJ. L.MatthewsM. S. (2012). A critique of the literature on parenting gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(3), 259–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212451703
36.
JollyJ. L.MatthewsM. S.NesterJ. (2013). Homeschooling the gifted: A parent’s perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212469999
37.
JonesT. L.PrinzR. J. (2005). Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent child adjustment. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(3), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.12.004
38.
KarpinskiR. I.Kinase KolbA. M.TetreaultN. A.BorowskiT. B. (2018). High intelligence: A risk factor for psychological and physiological overexcitabilities. Intelligence, 66, 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.09.001
KoshyV.BrownJ.JonesD.SmithC. P. (2013). Exploring the views of parents of high ability children living in relative poverty. Educational Research, 55(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.825167
41.
KoshyV.Portman SmithC.BrownJ. (2017). Parenting “gifted and talented” children in urban areas: Parents’ voices. Gifted Education International, 33(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429414535426
42.
KuckartzU. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice, and using software. Sage.
43.
KuczynskiL.PitmanR.Ta-YoungL.HarachL. (2016). Children’s influence on their parents’ adult development: Mothers’ and fathers’ receptivity to children’s request for change. Journal of Adult Development, 23(4), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-016-9235-8
44.
LeeK. M.OlenchakF. R. (2015). Individuals with a gifted/attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis: Identification, performance, outcomes, and interventions. Gifted Education International, 31(3), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429414530712
45.
LevyJ.PluckerJ. (2003). Theory and practice: Assessing the psychological presentation of gifted and talented clients: A multicultural perspective. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 16(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070310001610100
46.
LockhartK.MeyerM. S.CrutchfieldK. (2022). A content analysis of state plans for gifted and talented education. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211026240
47.
LubinskiD. (2016). From Terman to today: A century of findings on intellectual precocity. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 900–944. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675476
48.
LubinskiD.WebbR. M.MorelockM. J.BenbowC. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A ten-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 718–729. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.4.718
49.
MakelM. C.KellH. J.LubinskiD.PutallazM.BenbowC. P. (2016). When lightning strikes twice: Profoundly gifted, profoundly accomplished. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616644735
50.
MarlandS. P.Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to the U.S. Office of Education (Government Documents, Y4.L 11/2: G: 36) (Vol.1). U.S. Government Printing Office.
51.
MateY. B. (2009). What are extraordinary gifted children like (equal to or above 189 IQ): A study of 10 cases. Gifted and Talented International, 24(2), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2009.11673532
52.
MatthewsM. S.RitchotteJ. A.JollyJ. L. (2014). What’s wrong with giftedness: Parents’ perceptions of the gifted label. International Studies of Sociology in Education, 24(4), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2014.990225
53.
MatthewsM. S.ShaunessyE. (2010). Putting standards into practice: Evaluating the utility of the NAGC pre-K—Grade 12 gifted program standards. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209356708
54.
McBeeM. T.ShaunessyE.MatthewsM. S. (2012). Policy matters: An analysis of district-level efforts to increase the identification of underrepresented learners. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(4), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X12463511
55.
McHughM. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb), 22(3), 276–282.
56.
McNamaraC. (2009). General guidelines for conducting interviews. Authenticity Consulting.
57.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
58.
MorawskaA.SandersM. R. (2008). Parenting gifted and talented children: What are the key child behavior and parenting issues. Psychiatry, 42(9), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048670802277271
59.
MorawskaA.SandersM. R. (2009). Parenting gifted and talented children: Conceptual and empirical foundations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209334962
60.
Moritz RudasillK.AdelsonJ. L.CallahanC. M.Vogt HoulihanD.KeizerB. M. (2013). Gifted students’ perceptions of parenting styles: Associations with cognitive ability, sex, race, and age. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212460886
61.
MunR.HertzogN. (2019). The influence of parental and self-expectations on Asian American women who entered college early. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(2), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218823559
62.
NobleH.SmithJ. (2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(2), 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102054
63.
NowellL. S.NorrisJ. M.WhiteD. E.MoulesN. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
64.
OhanJ. L.LeungD. W.JohnstonC. (2000). The parenting sense of competence scale: Evidence of a stable factor structure and validity. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32(4), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087122
65.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.LeeS.-Y.NgoiM.NgoiD. (2004). Addressing the achievement gap between minority and nonminority children by increasing access to gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(2), 127–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320402800202
66.
PapadopoulosD. (2021). Parenting the exceptional social-emotional needs of gifted and talented children: What do we know?Children, 8(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8110953
67.
PeeblesJ. L.MendaglioS.McCowanM. (2023). The experience of parenting gifted children: A thematic analysis of interviews with parents of elementary-age children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 67(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862221120418
68.
PetersS. J.EngerrandK. (2016). Equity and excellence: Proactive efforts in the identification of underrepresented students for gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216643165
69.
PetersonJ. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 280–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346946
70.
PetersonJ. S. (2014). Giftedness, trauma, and development: A qualitative, longitudinal case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(4), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214552564
71.
PorathM. (2007). The conceptual underpinnings of giftedness: Development and educational implications. High Ability Studies, 17(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130601121268
72.
PorterL. (2005). Gifted young children: A guide for teachers and parents. Allen & Unwin.
73.
RenatiR.BonfiglioN. S.DildaM.MasciaM. L.PennaM. P. (2023). Gifted children through the eyes of their parents: Talents, social-emotional challenges, and educational strategies from preschool through middle school. Children, 10(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010042
74.
RenatiR.BonfiglioN. S.PfeifferS. (2017). Challenges raising a gifted child: Stress and resilience factors within the family. Gifted Education International, 33(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416650948
75.
RinnA. N. (2020). Social, emotional, and psychosocial development of gifted and talented individuals. Prufrock Press.
76.
RinnA. N.MunR. U.HodgesJ. (2022). 2020-2021 state of the states in gifted education. National Association of Gifted Children and Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. https://nagc.org/page/state-of-the-states-report
77.
RoulstonK. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. Sage.
78.
RubensteinL. D.SchellingN.WilczynskiS. M.HooksE. N. (2015). Lived experiences of parents of gifted students with autism spectrum disorder: The struggle to find appropriate educational experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215592193
79.
RuffD. L. (2021). How parental viewpoint and personality affect gifted child outcomes. Gifted Education International, 37(1), 80–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420946072
80.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
81.
SaranliA. G. (2017). Research on coping methods and support systems of parents of gifted children in Turkey. Journal of Education and Future, 11(1), 1–13.
82.
SchultzR. A. (2018). Recognizing the outliers: Behaviors and tendencies of the profoundly gifted learner in mixed-ability classrooms. Roeper Review, 40(3), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1469068
83.
ShavininaL. V. (1999). The psychological essence of the child prodigy phenomenon: Sensitive periods and cognitive experience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629904300104
84.
ShentonA. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
SilvermanL. K.KearneyK. (1989). Parents of the extraordinarily gifted. Advanced Development, 1(1), 41–56.
87.
SternbergR. J. (2007). Cultural dimensions of giftedness and talent: Cultural conceptions of giftedness. Roeper Review, 29(3), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190709554404
88.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2012). A proposed direction forward for gifted education based on psychological science. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212456079
89.
TanC. Y. (2019). Involvement practices, socioeconomic status, and student science achievement: Insights from a typology of home and school involvement patterns. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 899–924. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218807146
90.
TermanL. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford University Press.
91.
TerrassierJ. C. (1985). Dyssynchrony: Uneven development. In FreemanJ. (Ed.), The psychology of gifted children (pp. 265–274). Wiley.
92.
ToperD. R.KeaneS. P.SheltonT. L.CalkinsS. D. (2010). Parent involvement and student academic performance: A multiple mediational analysis. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 38(3), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2010.486297
93.
TracyS. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org10.1177/1077800410383121
94.
TurnerD. W.III. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754–760.
Velez-AgostoN.Soto-CrespoJ.Vizzcarrondo-OppenheimerM.Vega-MolinaS.CollC. (2017). Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory revision: Moving culture from the macro into the micro. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617704397
97.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
98.
WebbJ. T.AmendE. R.WebbN. E.GoerssN.BeljanP.OlenchakF. R. (2005). Misdiagnosis and dual diagnoses of gifted children and adults: ADHD, bipolar, OCD, Asperger’s, Depression, and other disorders. Great Potential Press.
99.
WellischM. (2021). Parenting with eyes wide open: Young gifted children, early entry and social isolation. Gifted Education International, 37(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429419899946
100.
WillisD. G.Sullivan-BolyaiS.KnaffK.CohenM. Z. (2016). Distinguishing features and similarities between descriptive and phenomenological and qualitative description research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 38(9), 1185–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945916645499
101.
ZhangF.JiangY.MingH.RenY.WangL.HuangS. (2020). Family socio-economic status and children’s academic achievement: The different roles of parental involvement and subjective social mobility. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12374
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
