Culturally responsive instruction is recommended to mitigate disparities in the retention of racially and ethnically diverse students in gifted programs. However, the endorsement of colorblind racial ideology is associated with lower multicultural teaching competency and the adoption of deficit perspectives of students of color. The present study examined the relationship between colorblind racial ideology and multicultural teaching competency among a sample of 2,323 Texas teachers who report providing instruction for students identified as gifted and talented in either general or gifted-specific settings. Multiple regression analysis found that racial colorblindness, sex, and multicultural teaching knowledge predicted the self-reported implementation of culturally responsive instruction when teaching gifted students, while gifted-specific training and school diversity had no effects. Implications relate to the necessity of addressing teachers’ racial beliefs and ensuring that gifted-specific professional development equips teachers with the knowledge and skills necessary for meeting the needs of diverse gifted students.
AnnammaS. A.JacksonD. D.MorrisonD. (2017). Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: Using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837
4.
AragónO. R.DovidioJ. F.GrahamM. J. (2017). Colorblind and multicultural ideologies are associated with faculty adoption of inclusive teaching practices. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000026
5.
AronsonB.LaughterJ. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066
6.
BabbittL. G.ToosiN. R.SommersS. R. (2016). A broad and insidious appeal: Unpacking the reasons for endorsing racial color blindness. In NevilleH. A.GallardoM. E.SueD. W. (Eds.), The myth of racial color blindness: Manifestations, dynamics, and impact (pp. 53–68). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14754-004\
7.
BallardR. (1992). Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Psychological Reports, 71(1), 1155–1160.
8.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
9.
BatteyD.BartellT.WebelC.LowryA. (2021). Understanding the impact of racial attitudes on preservice teachers’ perceptions of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 52(1), 62–93. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0207
10.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2016). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States (5th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
CadenasG. A.CisnerosJ.SpaniermanL. B.YiJ.ToddN. R. (2020). Detrimental effects of color-blind racial attitudes in preparing a culturally responsive teaching workforce for immigrants. Journal of Career Development, 48, 926–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845320903380
14.
ChaoR. C. (2013). Race/ethnicity and multicultural competence among school counselors: Multicultural training, racial/ethnic identity, and color-blind racial attitudes. Journal of Counseling & Development, 91(2), 140–151. https://10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00082.x
15.
ClarkeP.WheatonB. (2007). Addressing data sparseness in contextual population research using cluster analysis to create synthetic neighborhoods. Sociological Methods & Research, 35(1), 311–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124106292362
16.
CobbJ. S. (2017). Inequality frames: How teachers inhabit color-blind ideology. Sociology of Education, 90(4), 315–332. https://10.1177/0038040717739612
17.
CollinsK. H. (2018). Confronting color-blind STEM talent development: Toward a contextual model for Black student STEM identity. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18757958
18.
ComstockM.LitkeE.HillK. L.DesimoneL. M. (2023). A culturally responsive disposition: How professional learning and teachers’ beliefs about and self-efficacy for culturally responsive teaching relate to instruction. AERA Open, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221140092
19.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358
20.
DebnamK. J.PasE. T.BottianiJ.CashA. H.BradshawC. P. (2015). An examination of the association between observed and self-reported culturally proficient teaching practices. Psychology in the Schools, 52(6), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21845
21.
DeCuir-GunbyJ. T. (2020). Using critical race mixed methodology to explore the experiences of African Americans in education. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101836
22.
DeeT. S.PennerE. K. (2017). The causal effects of cultural relevance: Evidence from an ethnic studies curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 127–166. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216677002
23.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
24.
EzzaniM. D.MunR. U.LeeL. E. (2021). District leaders focused on systemic equity in identification and services for gifted education: From policy to practice. Roeper Review, 43(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2021.1881853
25.
FischerD. G.FickC. (1993). Measuring social desirability: Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(2), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053002011
26.
FisherR. J.KatzJ. E. (2000). Social-desirability bias and the validity of self-reported values. Psychology & Marketing, 17(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<105::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-9
27.
FloresO. J.GunzenhauserM. G. (2019). The problems with colorblind leadership revealed: A call for race-conscious leaders. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(8), 963–981. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1635278
28.
FordD. Y. (2010). Multicultural issues: Underrepresentation of culturally different students in gifted education: Reflections about current problems and recommendations for the future. Gifted Child Today, 33(3), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621751003300308
29.
FordD. Y. (2014). Segregation and the underrepresentation of Blacks and Hispanics in gifted education: Social inequality and deficit paradigms. Roeper Review, 36(3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.919563
FordD. Y.KingR. A.Jr. (2014). No Blacks allowed: Segregated gifted education in the context of Brown v. Board of Education. The Journal of Negro Education, 83(3), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.83.3.0300
33.
FordD. Y.MooreJ. L.III. (2004). Creating culturally responsive gifted education classrooms: Understanding “culture” is the first step. Gifted Child Today, 27(4), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2004-147
34.
FordD. Y.MooreJ. L.IIIScottM. T. (2011). Key theories and frameworks for improving the recruitment and retention of African American students in gifted education. The Journal of Negro Education, 83(3), 239–253. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41341131
35.
FordD. Y.TrotmanM. F. (2001). Teachers of gifted students: Suggested multicultural characteristics and competencies. Roeper Review, 23(4), 235–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190109554111
36.
GarciaG. A.KorenE. R.CuellarM. G. (2020). Assessing color-neutral racial attitudes of faculty at Hispanic-serving institutions. AERA Open, 6(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420944906
GrissomJ. A.ReddingC. (2016). Discretion and disproportionality: Explaining the underrepresentation of high-achieving students of color in gifted programs. AERA Open, 2(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415622175
39.
HachfeldA.HahnA.SchroederS.AndersY.KunterM. (2015). Should teachers be colorblind? How multicultural and egalitarian beliefs differentially relate to aspects of teachers’ professional competence for teaching in diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.001
40.
HamiltonR.McCoachD. B.TutwilerS. M.SiegleD.GubbinsE. J.CallahanC. M.BrodersenA. V.MunR. U. (2018). Disentangling the roles of institutional and individual poverty in the identification of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738053
41.
HayesA. F.CaiL. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 709–722. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03192961
42.
HensonR. K. (2002, April1–5). The logic and interpretation of structure coefficients in multivariate general linear model analyses [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, United States.
43.
HensonR. K. (2006). Effect-size measures and meta-analytic thinking in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 601–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005283558
44.
HodgesJ.TayJ.MaedaY.GentryM. (2018). A meta-analysis of gifted and talented identification practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752107
45.
KeithT. Z. (2015). Multiple regression and beyond: An introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
46.
LaiM. H. C.KwokO.-m. (2015). Examining the rule of thumb of not using multilevel modeling: The “design effect smaller than two” rule. Journal of Experimental Education, 83(3), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.907229
47.
LewisA. E. (2001). There is no “race” in the schoolyard: Color-blind ideology in an (almost) all-white school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 781–811. https://10.3102/00028312038004781
48.
LiouD. D.LeighP. R.Rotheram-FullerE.CutlerK. D. (2019). The influence of teachers’ colorblind expectations on the political, normative, and technical dimensions of educational reform. International Journal of Educational Reform, 28(1), 122–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056787918824207
49.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). Missing data adjustments in large surveys (with discussion). Journal of Business Economics and Statistics, 6(1), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1988.10509663
50.
LockhartK.MunR. U. (2020). Developing a strong home-school connection to better identify and serve culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 43(4), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520940743
51.
LooR.LoewenP. (2004). Confirmatory factor analyses of scores from full and short versions of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), 2343–2352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01980.x
52.
MaasC. J. M.HoxJ. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(3), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
53.
MayhewM. J.SimonoffJ. S. (2015). Effect coding as a mechanism for improving the accuracy of measuring students who self-identify with more than one race. Research in Higher Education, 56(1), 595–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9364-0
54.
McCoachD. B. (2010). Hierarchical linear modeling. The Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences, 123–140.
55.
MekawiY.BresinK.HunterC. D. (2017). Who is more likely to “not see race”? Individual differences in racial colorblindness. Race and Social Problems, 9(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-017-9211-3
56.
MellomP. J.StraubhaarR.BalderasC.AriailM.PortesP. R. (2018). “They come with nothing”: How professional development in a culturally responsive pedagogy shapes teacher attitudes towards Latino/a English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.013
MullerJ. T.MilesJ. R. (2017). Intergroup dialogue in undergraduate multicultural psychology education: Group climate development and outcomes. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040042
59.
MunR. U.EzzaniM. D.LeeL. E. (2020). Culturally relevant leadership in gifted education: A systematic literature review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 43(2), 108–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353220912009
60.
MunR. U.EzzaniM. D.LeeL. E.OttweinJ. K. (2021). Building systemic capacity to improve identification and services in gifted education: A case study of one district. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(2), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0016986220967376
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Characteristics of public school teachers. Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/clr
64.
NevilleH. A.AwadG. H.BrooksJ. E.FloresM. P.BluemelJ. (2013). Color-blind racial ideology: Theory, training, and measurement implications in psychology. American Psychologist, 68(6), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033282
65.
NevilleH. A.LillyR. L.DuranG.LeeR. M.BrowneL. (2000). Construction and initial validation of the Color-Blind Racial Attitudes Scale (CoBRAS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.59
66.
NevilleH. A.PoteatV. P.LewisJ. A.SpaniermanL. B. (2014). Changes in white college students’ color-blind racial ideology over 4 years: Do diversity experiences make a difference?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035168
67.
OhE.ChoiC.NevilleH. A.AndersonC. J.Landrum-BrownJ. (2010). Beliefs about affirmative action: A test of the group self-interest and racism beliefs models. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3(3), 163–176. https://10.1037/a0019799
68.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.ThomsonD. L. (2010). Gifted programming for poor or minority urban students: Issues and lessons learned. Gifted Child Today, 33(4), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621751003300413
69.
OsborneJ.WatersE. (2002). Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(2), 1–9.
70.
ParsonsA. A.WalsemannK. M.JonesS. J.KnopfH.BlakeC. E. (2018). Parental involvement: Rhetoric of inclusion in an environment of exclusion. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47(1), 113–139. https://10.1177/0891241616676874
71.
PattersonC. A.Domenech RodríguezM. M. (2019). Microaggression detection measurement impact on white college students’ colorblindness. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 24(2), 127–138. https://10.24839/2325-7342.JN24.2.127
72.
PattersonC. A.PapaL. A.RevelesA. K.Domenech RodríguezM. M. (2018). Undergraduate student change in cultural competence: Impact of a multicultural psychology course. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 4(2), 81–92. https://10.1037/stl0000108
PoteatV. P.SpaniermanL. (2012). Modern racism attitudes among white students: The role of dominance and authoritarianism and the mediating effects of racial color-blindness. Journal of Social Psychology, 152(6), 758–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.700966
76.
QuinnD. M. (2017). Racial attitudes of pre-k-12 and postsecondary educators: Descriptive evidence from nationally representative data. Educational Researcher, 46(7), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17727270
77.
RinnA. N.MunR. U.HodgesJ. (2020). 2018-2019 state of the states in gifted education. National Association for Gifted Children; Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. https://www.nagc.org/2018-2019-state-states-gifted-education
78.
RochmesJ.PennerE. K.LoebS. (2017). Educators as “equity warriors” (CEPA Working Paper No.17-11). http://cepa.stanford.edu/wp17-11
79.
SiegleD.GubbinsE. J.O’RourkeP.LangleyS. D.MunR. U.LuriaS. R.LittleC. A.McCoachD. B.KnuppT.CallahanC. M.PluckerJ. A. (2016). Barriers to underserved students’ participation in gifted programs and possible solutions. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216640930
80.
Snijders TomA. B. (2005). Power and sample size in multilevel linear models. In EverittB. S.HowellD. C. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (Vol. 3, pp. 1570–1573). Wiley.
81.
SobleJ. R.SpaniermanL. B.LiaoH.-Y. (2011). Effects of a brief video intervention on white university students’ racial attitudes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(1), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021158
82.
SpaniermanL. B.OhE.HeppnerP. P.NevilleH. A.MobleyM.WrightC. V.DillonF. R.NavarroR. (2011). The multicultural teaching competency scale: Development and initial validation. Urban Education, 46(3), 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085910377442
83.
SperlingR.KuhnC. (2016). CoBRAS as a predictor of attitudes toward redistributing resources to improve predominantly black schools. Journal of Negro Education, 85(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.85.2.0172
84.
StollL. C. (2014). Constructing the color-blind classroom: Teachers’ perspectives on race and schooling. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 17(5), 688–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2014.885425
UllucciK.BatteyD. (2011). Exposing color blindness/grounding color consciousness: Challenges for teacher education. Urban Education, 46(6), 1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911413150
92.
WeltonA. D.DiemS.HolmeJ. J. (2015). Color conscious, cultural blindness: Suburban school districts and demographic change. Education and Urban Society, 47(6), 695–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124513510734
93.
WrightB. L.FordD. Y.YoungJ. L. (2017). Ignorance or indifference? Seeking excellence and equity for under-represented students of color in gifted education. Global Education Review, 4(1), 45–60. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1137997.pdf
94.
YiJ.ToddN. R. (2021). Internalized model minority myth among Asian Americans: Links to anti-black attitudes and opposition to affirmative action. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 27(4), 569–578. https://10.1037/cdp0000448
95.
YiJ.ToddN. R.MekawiY. (2020). Racial colorblindness and confidence in and likelihood of action to address prejudice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 65(3–4), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12409
