Social media continues to be an ever-present part of people’s lives. One of the largest social media websites, Reddit has more than 430 million unique visitors monthly. What is unknown to scholars is how gifted education fits into this modern form of communication. In our research, we examined how gifted education is discussed over Reddit using text mining in combination with sentiment analysis. In addition, our research conditioned sentiment on variables such as self-disclosure, interest, and controversy. We found that, overall, discussion of giftedness was neutral in terms of sentiment and used common language across subreddits. We also found that the language used and distribution of sentiment were similar between self-disclosures and non-self-disclosures.
AltD. (2017). Students’ social media engagement and fear of missing out (FoMO) in a diverse classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 388–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9149-x
3.
AltrabshehN.GaberM. M.CoceaM. (2013). SA-E: Sentiment analysis for education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 255, 353–362.
4.
AmadorP.AmadorJ. (2014). Academic advising via Facebook: Examining student help seeking. The Internet and Higher Education, 21(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.003
5.
AmmariT.SchoenebeckS.MorrisM. (2014). Accessing social support and overcoming judgment on social media among parents of children with special needs. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media (Vol. 8). https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14503
6.
AmmariT.SchoenebeckS.RomeroD. (2019). Self-declared throwaway accounts on Reddit: How platform affordances and shared norms enable parenting disclosure and support. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359237
7.
AndalibiN.MorrisM. E.ForteA. (2018). Testing waters, sending clues: Indirect disclosures of socially stigmatized experiences on social media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274288
8.
AnspachN. M.CarlsonT. N. (2020). What to believe? Social media commentary and belief in misinformation. Political Behavior, 42(3), 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11109-018-9515-Z
9.
AppelO.ChiclanaF.CarterJ.FujitaH. (2016). A hybrid approach to the sentiment analysis problem at the sentence level. Knowledge-Based Systems, 108, 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.05.040
BalahadiaF. F.FernandoM. C. G.JuanatasI. C. (2016). Teacher’s performance evaluation tool using opinion mining with sentiment analysis. In 2016 IEEE region 10 symposium (TENSYMP) (pp. 95–98). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/tenconspring.2016.7519384
12.
BoutonE.TalS. B.AsterhanC. S. (2021). Students, social network technology and learning in higher education: Visions of collaborative knowledge construction vs. the reality of knowledge sharing. The Internet and Higher Education, 49(1), 100787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100787
13.
BrownE. F.WishneyL. R. (2017). Equity and excellence: Political forces in the education of gifted students in the United States and abroad. Global Education Review, 4(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1137995.pdf
14.
CarpenterJ.McDadeC.ChildersS. (2018). Advice seeking and giving in the reddit r/Teachers online space. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2207–2215). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/182831/
15.
CeronA.NegriF. (2016). The “social side” of public policy: Monitoring online public opinion and its mobilization during the policy cycle. Policy & Internet, 8(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.117
16.
Chang-KredlS.ColanninoD. (2017). Constructing the image of the teacher on Reddit: Best and worst teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.019
17.
CheungC. M.LeeZ.ChanT. (2015). Self-disclosure in social networking sites: The role of perceived cost, perceived benefits and social influence. Internet Research, 25(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-09-2013-0192
CraigW.Boniel-NissimM.KingN.WalshS. D.BoerM.DonnellyP. D.. . . PickettW. (2020). Social media use and cyber-bullying: A cross-national analysis of young people in 42 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(6), S100–S108.
20.
De ChoudhuryM.DeS. (2014). Mental health discourse on reddit: Self-disclosure, social support, and anonymity. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media (Vol. 8). http://www.munmund.net/pubs/icwsm_14_1.pdf
21.
DerlegaV. J.MettsS.PetronioS.MargulisS. T. (1993). SAGE series on close relationships. Self-disclosure. SAGE.
22.
DerlegaV. J.WinsteadB. A.GreeneK. (2008). Self-disclosure and starting a close relationship. In SprecherS.WenzelA.HarveyJ. (Eds.), Handbook of relationship beginnings (pp. 153–174). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429020513-16
23.
DingX.LiuB.YuP. S. (2008, February). A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 231–240). https://doi.org/10.1145/1341531.1341561
24.
DixsonD. D.PetersS. J.MakelM. C.JollyJ. L.MatthewsM. S.MillerE. M.. . . WilsonH. E. (2020). A call to reframe gifted education as maximizing learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(4), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720978057
GibbsJ. L.EllisonN. B.HeinoR. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33(2), 152–177.
29.
HaslamD. M.TeeA.BakerS. (2017). The use of social media as a mechanism of social support in parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(7), 2026–2037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0716-6
30.
HoganB. (2017). Online social networks: Concepts for data collection and analysis. In FieldingN. G.LeeR.BlankG. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (2nd ed., pp. 241–258). SAGE.
31.
HuM.LiuB. (2004, August). Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 168–177). https://doi.org/10.1145/1014052.1014073
JamnikM. R.LaneD. J. (2017). The use of Reddit as an inexpensive source for high-quality data. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 22, 5. https://doi.org/10.7275/swgt-rj52
JuncoR.ElavskyC. M.HeibergerG. (2013). Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x
36.
KaraN.GeçerE.SahinÇ. (2020). Social media habits through a new media literacy perspective: A case of gifted students. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 6(3), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.6-3-4
37.
LaddJ.RyanR.SinghL.BodeL.BudakC.ConradF.CookseyE.Davis-KeanP.Dworak-FisherK.FreelonD.HopkinsD.JensenB.KelleyR.MillerR.MneihmnehZ.PasekJ.RaghunathanT.GresenzC.SudeepaR.TraugottM. (2020). Measurement considerations for quantitative social science research using social media data. https://psyarxiv.com/ga6nc/
38.
Lapidot-LeflerN.BarakA. (2012). Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.014
39.
LeavittA. (2015). “This is a throwaway account”: Temporary technical identities and perceptions of anonymity in a massive online community. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 317–327). https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675175
40.
LiuZ.MinQ.ZhaiQ.SmythR. (2016). Self-disclosure in Chinese micro-blogging: A social exchange theory perspective. Information and Management, 53(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.08.006
41.
MaX.HancockJ.NaamanM. (2016). Anonymity, intimacy and self-disclosure in social media. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3857–3869). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858414
42.
MagniniV. P.HoneycuttE. D.Jr.HodgeS. K. (2003). Data mining for hotel firms: Use and limitations. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010880403442009
43.
MahindrakarP.HanumanthappaM. (2013). Data mining in healthcare: A survey of techniques and algorithms with its limitations and challenges. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 3(6), 937–941.
44.
MakelM. C.PluckerJ. A. (2017). Toward a more perfect psychology: Improving trust, accuracy, and transparency in research. American Psychological Association.
45.
MancaS.RanieriM. (2016). Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of social media for teaching in higher education. Computers & Education, 95, 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.012
46.
McCay-PeetL.Quan-HaaseA. (2017). What is social media and what questions can social media research help us answer. In The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (pp. 13–26). https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473983847
47.
Mite-BaidalK.Delgado-VeraC.Solís-AvilésE.EspinozaA. H.Ortiz-ZambranoJ.Varela-TapiaE. (2018). Sentiment analysis in education domain: A systematic literature review. In International conference on technologies and innovation (pp. 285–297). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-00940-3_21
48.
MolinM.SorbringE.Löfgren-MårtensonL. (2015). Teachers’ and parents’ views on the Internet and social media usage by pupils with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 19(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629514563558
49.
MullenL. A.BenoitK.KeyesO.SelivanovD.ArnoldJ. (2018). Fast, consistent tokenization of natural language text. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(23), 655. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00655
50.
MunR. U.EzzaniM. D.LeeL. E.OttweinJ. K. (2021). Building systemic capacity to improve identification and services in gifted education: A case study of one district. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65, 132–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220967376
51.
Nabity-GroverT.CheungC. M.ThatcherJ. B. (2020). Inside out and outside in: How the COVID-19 pandemic affects self-disclosure on social media. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.10218
52.
NealJ. W.NealZ. P.MillsK. J.LawlorJ. A.McAlindonK. (2019). What types of brokerage bridge the research-practice gap? The case of public school educators. Social Networks, 59, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.05.006
OttweinJ. K. (2020). Working toward equitable gifted programming: The school psychologist’s role. Psychology in the Schools, 57(6), 937–945. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22353
ParkA.ConwayM. (2017). Tracking health related discussions on Reddit for public health applications. In AMIA annual symposium proceedings (Vol. 2017, p. 1362). American Medical Informatics Association. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977623/
PrestridgeS. (2019). Categorising teachers’ use of social media for their professional learning: A self-generating professional learning paradigm. Computers & Education, 129(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.003
59.
RaniS.KumarP. (2017). A sentiment analysis system to improve teaching and learning. Computer, 50(5), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.133
60.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
RelucioF. S.PalaoagT. D. (2018). Sentiment analysis on educational posts from social media. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on E-education, E-business, E-management and E-learning (pp. 99–102). https://doi.org/10.1145/3183586.3183604
SantosC. L.RitaP.GuerreiroJ. (2018). Improving international attractiveness of higher education institutions based on text mining and sentiment analysis. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(3), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2017-0027
SeidmanG. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 402–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009
68.
SelwynN. (2012). Social media in higher education. The Europa World of Learning, 1(1), 1–10.
69.
SilgeJ.RobinsonD. (2016). Tidytext: Text mining and analysis using tidy data principles in R. Journal of Open Source Software, 1(3), 37. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00037
70.
SinghN. K.TomarD. S.SangaiahA. K. (2020). Sentiment analysis: A review and comparative analysis over social media. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0862-8
71.
SongH.KimJ.ParkN. (2019). I know my professor: Teacher self-disclosure in online education and a mediating role of social presence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(6), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455126
72.
Staudt WilletK. B.CarpenterJ. P. (2020). Teachers on Reddit? Exploring contributions and interactions in four teaching-related subreddits. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(2), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1722978
73.
Sureda GarciaI.López PenádesR.Rodríguez RodríguezR.Sureda NegreJ. (2020). Cyberbullying and internet addiction in gifted and nongifted teenagers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(3), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220919338
74.
SymeonidisS.EffrosynidisD.ArampatzisA. (2018). A comparative evaluation of pre-processing techniques and their interactions for twitter sentiment analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 110, 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.06.022
WalshR. M.ForestA. L.OrehekE. (2020). Self-disclosure on social media: The role of p perceived network responsiveness. Computers in Human Behavior, 104(1), 106162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106162
77.
WangL.YanJ.LinJ.CuiW. (2017). Let the users tell the truth: Self-disclosure intention and self-disclosure honesty in mobile social networking. International Journal of Information Management, 37(1), 1428–1440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.10.006
78.
WangY.FikisD. J. (2019). Common core state standards on Twitter: Public sentiment and opinion leaders. Educational Policy, 33(4), 650–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817723739
79.
YueL.ChenW.LiX.ZuoW.YinM. (2019). A survey of sentiment analysis in social media. Knowledge and Information Systems, 60, 617–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-018-1236-4
80.
ZiriklyA.ResnikP.UzunerO.HollingsheadK. (2019). CLPsych 2019 shared task: Predicting the degree of suicide risk in Reddit posts. In Proceedings of the sixth workshop on computational linguistics and clinical psychology (pp. 24–33). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-3003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
