AckermanP. L.LakinJ. M. (2018). Expertise and individual differences. In PfeifferS. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 65-80). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_5
2.
AssoulineS. G.ColangeloN.Vantassel-BaskaJ.Lupkowski-ShoplikA. (2015). A nation empowered. Belin-Blank Center.
3.
DixsonD. D.PetersS. J.MakelM. C.JollyJ. L.MatthewsM. S.MillerE. M.Rambo-HernandezK. E.RinnA. N.RobinsJ. H.WilsonH. E. (2020). A call to reframe gifted education as maximizing learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(4), 22-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720978057
4.
LakinJ. M.WaiJ. (2020). Spatially gifted, academically inconvenienced: Do spatially talented students experience less academic engagement and more behavioral issues?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 1015-1038. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12343
5.
PetersS. J. (2021). The challenges of achieving equity within public school gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211002535
6.
PetersS. J.Rambo-HernandezK.MakelM. C.MatthewsM. S.PluckerJ. A. (2017). Should millions of students take a gap year? Large numbers of students start the school year above grade level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701834
7.
SnowR. E. (1990). The concept of aptitude. In SnowR. E.WileyD. E. (Eds.), Improving inquiry in social science: A volume in honor of Lee J. Cronbach (pp. 249-284). Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
9.
WaiJ.LakinJ. M. (2020). Finding the missing Einsteins: Expanding the breadth of cognitive and noncognitive measures used in academic services. Contemporary Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101920
10.
WaiJ.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P.SteigerJ. H. (2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 860-871. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019454