AlmukhambetovaA.Hernández-TorranoD. (2020). Gifted students’ adjustment and underachievement in university: An exploration from the self-determination theory perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220905525
2.
BarronK. E.HullemanC. S. (2015). Expectancy-value-cost model of motivation. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 503-509). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26099-6
3.
BaslantiU.McCoachD. B. (2006). Factors related to the underachievement of university students in Turkey. Roeper Review, 28(4), 210-215. http://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554366
4.
BorkowskiJ. G.ThorpeP. K. (1994). Self-regulation and motivation: A life-span perspective on underachievement. In SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 45-73). Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
CastejónJ. L.GilarR.MiñanoP.GonzálezM. (2016). Latent class cluster analysis in exploring different profiles of gifted and talented students. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 166-174. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.003
6.
ClinkenbeardP. R. (2012). Motivation and gifted students: Implications of theory and research. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 622-630. http://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21628
7.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 416-436). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21
8.
DesmetO. A.PereiraN.PetersonJ. S. (2020). Telling a tale: How underachievement develops in gifted girls. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219888633
9.
DiemerM. A.BlusteinD. L. (2007). Vocational hope and vocational identity: Urban adolescents’ career development. Journal of Career Assessment, 15(1), 98-118. http://doi.org/10.1177/1069072706294528
10.
FongC. J.KremerK. P. (2020). An expectancy-value approach to math underachievement: Examining high school achievement, college attendance, and STEM interest. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219890599
11.
GarciaN. M.LopezN.VelezV. N. (2018). QuantCrit: Rectifying quantitative methods through critical race theory. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377675
12.
GarnA. C.MatthewsM. S.JollyJ. L. (2010). Parental influences on the academic motivation of gifted students: A self-determination theory perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(4), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210377657
13.
GaspardH.WilleE.WormingtonS. V.HullemanC. S. (2019). How are upper secondary school students’ expectancy-value profiles associated with achievement and university STEM major? A cross-domain comparison. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.005
MammadovS.WardT. J.CrossJ. R.CrossT. L. (2016). Use of latent profile analysis in studies of gifted students. Roeper Review, 38(3), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1183739
16.
MarciaJ. E.KrogerJ. (1993). The relational roots of identity. In KrogerJ. (Ed.), Discussions on ego identity (pp. 101-120). Taylor & Francis.
17.
McCallR. B.BeachS. R.LauS. (2000). The nature and correlates of underachievement among elementary schoolchildren in Hong Kong. Child Development, 71(3), 785-801. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00185
18.
McCallR. B.EvahnC.KratzerL. (1992). High school underachievers: What do they achieve as adults?Sage.
19.
McCoachD. B.SiegleD. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700205
20.
McCoachD. B.SiegleD.RubensteinL. D. (2020). Pay attention to inattention: Exploring ADHD symptoms in a sample of underachieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 100-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219901320
21.
MuenksK.WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2018). I can do this! The development and calibration of children’s expectations for success and competence beliefs. Developmental Review, 48, 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.04.001
22.
MurrahW. M.KosovichJ.HullemanC. (2016). A framework for incorporating intervention fidelity in educational evaluation studies. In Treatment fidelity in studies of educational intervention (pp. 47-68). Routledge.
23.
PauneskuD.WaltonG. M.RomeroC.SmithE. N.YeagerD. S.DweckC. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784-793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017
24.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93-97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
25.
PetersonJ. S. (2000). A follow-up study of one group of achievers and underachievers four years after high school graduation. Roeper Review, 22(4), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554041
PreckelF.HollingH.VockM. (2006). Academic underachievement: Relationship with cognitive motivation, achievement motivation, and conscientiousness. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20154
28.
ReisS. M.McCoachD. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go?Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302
29.
RinnA. N.BishopJ. (2015). Gifted adults: A systematic review and analysis of the literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215600795
30.
RubensteinL. D.SiegleD.ReisS. M.McCoachD. B.BurtonM. G. (2012). A complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 678-694. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21620
31.
SkorikovV.VondracekF. W. (1998). Vocational identity development: Its relationship to other identity domains and to overall identity development. Journal of Career Assessment, 6(1), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279800600102
SnyderK. E.FongC. J.PainterJ. K.PittardC. M.BarrS. M.PatallE. A. (2019). Interventions for academically underachieving students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100294
34.
SnyderK. E.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2013). A developmental, person-centered approach to exploring multiple motivational pathways in gifted underachievement. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 209-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.835597
35.
Steenbergen-HuS.Olszewski-KubiliusP.CalvertE. (2020). The effectiveness of current interventions to reverse the underachievement of gifted students: Findings of a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 132-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220908601
36.
WeissM. J.BloomH. S.Verbitsky-SavitzN.GuptaH.VigilA. E.CullinanD. N. (2017). How much do the effects of education and training programs vary across sites? Evidence from past multisite randomized trials. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(4), 843-876. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2017.1300719
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91-120). Academic Press.
39.
WigfieldA.TonksS.KlaudaS. L. (2009). Expectancy-value theory. In Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 69-90). Routledge.
40.
WormingtonS. V.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2017). A new look at multiple goal pursuit: The promise of a person-centered approach. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 407-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9358-2