Clarifying the Connections Among Giftedness,Metacognition,Self-Regulation,and Self-Regulated Learning: Implications for Theory and Practice

Abstract

The concept of giftedness has historically been shaped by theories of IQ, creativity, and expertise (including early conceptions of metacognition). These theories focus within the mind of the individual learner. Social, emotional, and motivational qualities of giftedness were treated as add-ons, not part of the core construct. This created misalignment with the social construction of knowledge—a position widely supported in gifted education practice. Newer, broader conceptions of metacognitive, self-regulated, and self-regulated learning processes have garnered interest. However, because these theories borrowed language from each other and earlier theories, assigning new meanings to old constructs, confusion arose about how to distinguish each of these three theories from each other or apply them to instruction. This article distinguishes among metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning, relating each to notions of giftedness, highlighting implications for practice, and especially highlighting self-regulated learning as a valuable contributor to understanding giftedness and designing instruction in gifted education.

Keywords

definition or conception of giftedness/talent metacognition self-regulation self-regulated learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

P. A.

(1985). Gifted and nongifted students’ perceptions of intelligence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 137-143. doi:10.1177/001698628502900307

Alexander

P. A.

Muia

J. A.

(1982). Gifted education: A comprehensive roadmap. Rockville, MD: Aspen.

Austin

L. B.

Shore

B. M.

(1993). Concept mapping of high and average achieving students, and experts. European Journal for High Ability, 4, 180-195.

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura

(1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

Barfurth

M. A.

Ritchie

K. C.

Irving

J. A.

Shore

B. M.

(2009). A metacognitive portrait of gifted learners. In Shavinina

L. V.

(Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (Vol. 1, pp. 397-417). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer.

Barfurth

M. A.

Shore

B. M.

(2008). White water during inquiry learning: Understanding the place of disagreements in the process of collaboration. In Shore

B. M.

Aulls

M. W.

Delcourt

M. A. B.

(Eds.), Inquiry in education: Overcoming barriers to successful implementation (Vol. II, pp. 149-164). New York, NY: Erlbaum.

Barzilai

Zohar

(2014). Reconsidering personal epistemology as metacognition: A multifaceted approach to the analysis of epistemic thinking. Educational Psychologist, 49(1), 13-35. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.863265

10.

Barzilai

Zohar

(2016). Epistemic (meta)cognition: Ways of thinking about knowledge and knowing. In Greene

J. A.

Sandoval

W. A.

Bråten

(Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 409-424). New York, NY: Routledge.

11.

Bennett-Rappell

Northcote

(2016). Underachieving gifted students: Two case studies. Issues in Educational Research, 26, 407-430. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier26/bennett-rappell.pdf

12.

Betts

G. T.

(1985). The autonomous learner model: For the gifted and talented. Greeley, CO: Alps.

13.

Betts

G. T.

Kercher

J. J.

(2009). The Autonomous Learner Model for the gifted & talented. In Renzulli

J. S.

Gubbins

J. E.

McMillan

K. S.

Eckert

R. D.

Little

C. A.

(Eds.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (2nd ed., pp. 49-104). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

14.

Betts

G. T.

Neihart

(1988). Profiles of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 248-253. doi:10.1177/001698628803200202

15.

Blackett

Webb

J. T.

(2011). The social-emotional dimension of giftedness: The SENG model. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 20, 5-13. Retrieved from http://www.thinkingahead.com.au/Documents/Social-emotional_dimension_of_giftedness_SENG_model_Blackett_Webb.pdf

16.

Borkowski

J. G.

Peck

V. A.

(1986). Causes and consequences of metamemory in gifted children. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 182-200). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Brown

(1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In Weinert

F. E.

Kluwe

R. H.

(Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

18.

Carver

C. S.

Scheier

M. F.

(2016). Self-regulation of action and affect. In Vohs

K. D.

Baumeister

R. F.

(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (5th ed., pp. 3-23). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

19.

Chi

M. T. H.

Feltovich

P. J.

Glaser

(1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2

20.

Chichekian

Shore

B. M.

(2014). Cognitive characteristics of the gifted: Reconceptualized in the context of inquiry learning and teaching. In Plucker

J. A.

Callahan

C. M.

(Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (2nd ed., pp. 119-132). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

21.

Colangelo

Assouline

S. G.

Gross

M. U. M.

(2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. The Templeton National Report on Acceleration. Volume 1 (ERIC Document Retrieval Service Number ED535137.). Iowa City: Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa.

22.

Colangelo

Brower

(1987). Labeling gifted youngsters and long-term impact on families. Gifted Child Quarterly, 3, 75-78. doi:10.1177/001698628703100206

23.

Coleman

Shore

B. M.

(1991). Problem-solving processes of high and average performers in physics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 366-379.

24.

Coleman

L. J.

Micko

K. J.

Cross

T. L.

(2015). Twenty-five years of research on the lived experience of being gifted in school: Capturing the students’ voices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38, 358-376. doi:10.1177/0162353215607322

25.

Csikszentmihalyi

Getzels

J. W.

(1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York, NY: Wiley.

26.

Dai

D. Y.

Coleman

L. J.

(2005). Introduction to the special issue on nature, nurture, and the development of exceptional competence. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 254-269. doi:10.4219/jeg-2005-337

27.

Dinsmore

D. L.

Alexander

P. A.

Loughlin

S. M.

(2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391-409. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6

28.

DiSessa

A. A.

(1987). The third revolution in computers and education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 343-367. doi:10.1002/tea.3660240407

29.

Ericsson

K. A.

Roring

R. W.

Nandagopal

(2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18, 3-56. doi:10.1080/13598130701350593

30.

Feldhusen

J. F.

(2005). A conception of giftedness. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 64-79). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Flavell

J. H.

(1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In Resnick

L. B.

(Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

32.

Gagné

(1993). Constructs and models pertaining to exceptional human abilities. In Heller

K. A.

Mönks

F. J.

Passow

A. H.

(Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 63-85). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

33.

Gagné

(2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15, 119-147. doi:10.1080/1359813042000314682

34.

Gagné

(2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 98-119). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Gagné

(2007). Ten commandments for academic talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 93-118. doi:10.1177/0016986206296660

36.

Garofalo

(1993). Mathematical problem preferences of meaning-oriented and number-oriented problem solvers. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 26-40.

37.

Gonzales

Leticia

(2013). Learning goals and strategies in the self-regulation of learning. US-China Education Review, 3(1), 46-50.

38.

Greene

J. A.

Muis

K. R.

Pieschl

(2010). The role of epistemic beliefs in students’ self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist, 45, 245-257.

39.

hannah

c. l.

Shore

B. M.

(2008). Twice exceptional students’ use of metacognitive skills on a comprehension-monitoring task. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 3-18.

40.

Hernandez Finch

M. E.

Speirs Neumeister

K. L.

Burney

V. H.

Cook

A. L

. (2014). The relationship of cognitive and executive functioning with achievement in gifted kindergarten children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 167-182. doi:10.1177/0016986217752096

41.

Hollingworth

L. S.

(1926). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York, NY: Macmillan.

42.

Housand

Reis

S. M.

(2008). Self-regulated learning in reading: Gifted pedagogy and instructional settings. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 108-136.

43.

Jarrell

Harley

J. M.

Lajoie

S. P.

(2016). The link between achievement emotions, appraisals and task performance: Pedagogical considerations for emotions in CBLEs. Journal of Computers in Education, 3, 289-307. doi:10.1007/s40692-016-0064-3

44.

Jung

J. Y.

(2017). Occupational/career amotivation and indecision for gifted and talented adolescents: A cognitive decision-making process perspective. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 28, 143-165.

45.

Kanevsky

(1995). Learning potentials of gifted students. Roeper Review, 17, 157-163. doi:10.1080/02783199509553650

46.

Kulikowich

J. M.

Alexander

P. A.

(1990). The effects of gender, ability, and grade on analogy performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 364-377. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(90)90031-U

47.

Lajoie

S. P.

(2008). Metacognition, self regulation, and self-regulated learning: A rose by any other name? Educational Psychology Review, 20, 469-475. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9088-1

48.

Landis

R. N.

Reschly

A. L.

(2013). Reexamining gifted underachievement and dropout through the lens of student engagement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36, 220-249. doi:10.1177/0162353213480864

49.

Manning

B. H.

(1996). The self-regulated learning aspect of metacognition: A component of gifted education. Roeper Review, 18, 217-223. doi:10.1080/02783199609553741

50.

Mason

Boldrin

Ariasi

(2010). Epistemic metacognition as a reflective activity about knowledge and knowing in the context of online information searching on the web. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 67-90. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9048-2

51.

Miele

D. B.

Scholer

A. A.

(2018). The role of metamotivational monitoring in motivation regulation. Educational Psychologist, 53, 1-21. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1371601

52.

Mooij

(2008). Education and self-regulation of learning for gifted pupils: Systemic design and development. Research Papers in Education, 23, 1-19. doi:10.1080/02671520701692551

53.

Morisano

Hirsh

J. B.

Peterson

J. B.

Pihl

R. O.

Shore

B. M.

(2010). Setting, elaborating, and reflecting on personal goals improves academic performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 255-264. doi:10.1037/a0018478

54.

Muis

K. R.

(2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42, 173-190.

55.

Muis

K. R.

Chevrier

Singh

C. A.

(2018). The role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 53, 165-184. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1421465

56.

Muis

K. R.

Duffy

M. C.

(2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students’ beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 213-225. doi:10.1037/a0029690

57.

Muis

K. R.

Psaradellis

Lajoie

S. P.

Di Leo

Chevrier

(2015). The role of epistemic emotions in mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 172-185. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1421465

58.

Muis

K. R.

Singh

(2018). The three facets of epistemic thinking in self-regulated learning. In Schunk

D. H.

Greene

J. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 434-456). New York, NY: Routledge.

59.

Neihart

(2008). Identifying and providing services to twice exceptional children. In Pfeiffer

S. I.

(Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 115-137). New York, NY: Springer.

60.

Pelletier

Shore

B. M.

(2003). The gifted learner, the novice, and the expert: Sharpening emerging views of giftedness. In Ambrose

D. C.

Cohen

Tannenbaum

A. J.

(Eds.), Creative intelligence: Toward theoretic integration (pp. 237-281). New York, NY: Hampton Press.

61.

Peters

S. J.

Engerrand

K. G.

(2016). Equity and excellence: Proactive efforts in the identification of underrepresented students for gifted and talented services. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 159-171. doi:10.1177/0016986216643165

62.

Phillipson

S. N.

Callingham

(2009). Understanding mathematical giftedness: Integrating self, action repertoires and the environment. In Shavinina

L. V.

(Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (Vol. 2, pp. 671-698). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2.33

63.

Piechowski

M. M.

(1997). Emotional intelligence: The measure of intrapersonal intelligence. In Colangelo

Davis

G. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 366-381). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

64.

Pinker

Bloom

(1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707-784. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00081061

65.

Reis

S. M.

Greene

M. J.

(n.d.). Using self-regulated learning to reverse underachievement in talented students. Storrs: University of Connecticut, Neag School of Education, Renzulli Center for Creativity, Gifted Education, and Talent Development. Retrieved from https://gifted.uconn.edu/schoolwide-enrichment-model/self-regulated_learning_reverse_underachievement/

66.

Reis

S. M.

McCoach

D. B.

(2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152-170. doi:10.1177/001698620004400302

67.

Renninger

K. A.

Hidi

S. E.

(2016). The power of interest for motivation and learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

68.

Renzulli

J. S.

(1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

69.

Renzulli

J. S.

(1998). Three-ring conception of giftedness. In Baum

S. M.

Reis

S. M.

Maxfield

L. R.

(Eds.), Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students (pp. 1-27). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

70.

Renzulli

J. S.

(2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246-279). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

71.

Renzulli

J. S.

(2010). Emerging conceptions of giftedness: Building a bridge to the new century. Exceptionality, 10, 67-75, doi:10.1207/S15327035EX1002

72.

Renzulli

J. S.

Reis

S. M.

(2014). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to-guide for educational excellence (3rd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

73.

Risemberg

Zimmerman

B. J.

(1992). Self-regulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review, 15, 98-101. doi:10.1080/02783199209553476

74.

Robinson

Shore

B. M.

Enersen

D. L.

(2006). Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

75.

Roche

Clarke

Sullivan

Cheeseman

(2013). Strategies for encouraging students to persist on challenging tasks: Some insights from work in classrooms. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 18(4), 27-33. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1093218.pdf

76.

Ryan

(2013). The gift of giftedness? A closer look at how labeling influences social and academic self-concept in highly capable learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Retrieved from https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/23616/Ryan_washington_0250O_11876.pdf?sequence=1

77.

Schraw

Moshman

(1992). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351-371. doi:10.1007/BF02212307

78.

Schraw

Sinatra

G. M.

(Eds.). (2004). Introduction [to special issue]: Epistemological development and its impact on cognition in academic domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 95-102. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.005

79.

Schulman

(1993). Great minds start with questions: Practical ways to enhance your child’s natural ability to think and create. Parents, 68(9), 99-102.

80.

Shore

B. M.

(2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative differences in how the gifted think. In Friedman

R. C.

Shore

B. M.

(Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 167-187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

81.

Shore

B. M.

Cornell

D. C.

Robinson

Ward

V. S.

(1991). Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

82.

Shore

B. M.

Kanevsky

L. S.

(1993). Thinking processes: Being and becoming gifted. In Heller

K. A.

Mönks

F. J.

Passow

A. H.

(Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 131-145). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

83.

Siegle

(2012). The underachieving gifted child: Recognizing, understanding, and reversing underachievement. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

84.

Siegle

McCoach

D. B.

(2002). Promoting a positive achievement attitude with gifted and talented students. In Neihart

Reis

S. M.

Robinson

N. M.

Moon

S. M.

(Eds.). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 237-249). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

85.

Skinner

E. A.

Pitzer

J. R.

Steele

J. S.

(2016). Can student engagement serve as a motivational resource for academic coping, persistence, and learning during late elementary and early middle school? Developmental Psychology, 52, 2099-2117. doi:10.1037/dev0000232

86.

Stanley

J. C.

Benbow

C. P.

(1982). Educating mathematically precocious youths: Twelve policy recommendations. Educational Researcher, 11, 4-9. doi:10.3102/0013189X011005004

87.

Steiner

H. H.

Carr

(2003). Cognitive development in gifted children: Toward a more precise understanding of emergent differences in intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 215-246. doi:10.1023/A:1024636317011

88.

Sternberg

R. J.

(1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 269-287. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00044629

89.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2001). Giftedness as developing expertise: A theory of the interface between high abilities and achieved excellence. High Ability Studies, 12, 159-179. doi:10.1080/13598130120084311

90.

Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(2005). Conception of giftedness (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

91.

Sternberg

R. J.

Ferrari

Clinkenbeard

Grigorenko

E. L.

(1996). Identification, instruction, and assessment of gifted children: A construct validation of a triarchic model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 129-137. doi:10.1177/001698629604000303

92.

Stoeger

Ziegler

(2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted mathematics underachievers. International Education Journal, 6, 261-271. Retrieved from https://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/education/iej/articles/V6n2/Stoeger/paper.pdf

93.

Stoeger

Ziegler

(2010). Do pupils with differing cognitive abilities benefit similarly from a self-regulated learning training program? Gifted Education International, 26, 110-123. doi:10.1177/026142941002600113no=EJ854979

94.

Strang

(1960). Helping your gifted child. New York, NY: Dutton.

95.

Tannenbaum

A. J.

(1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York, NY: Macmillan.

96.

Tomlinson

C. A.

Kaplan

S. N.

Renzulli

J. S.

Purcell

Leppien

Burns

D. E.

… Imbeau

M. B.

(2008). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high-ability learners (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

97.

Treffinger

D. J.

Isaksen

S. G.

(2005). Creative problem solving: The history, development, and implications for gifted education and talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 342-353. doi:10.1177/001698620504900407

98.

VanTassel-Baska

Little

(Eds.). (2011). Content-based curriculum for gifted learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

99.

Veenman

M. V. J.

Verhiej

(2003). Technical students’ metacognitive skills: Relating general vs. specific metacognitive skills to study success. Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 259-272. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00094-8

100.

Vohs

K. D.

Baumeister

R. F.

(Eds.). (2016). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (5th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

101.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Trans. M. Cole). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

102.

Walker

C. L.

Shore

B. M.

(2015). Myth busting: Do high-performing students prefer working alone? Gifted and Talented International, 30, 85-105.

103.

Walker

C. L.

Shore

B. M.

Tabatabai

(2013). Eye of the beholder: Investigating the interplay between inquiry role diversification and social perspective taking. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 144-192. doi:10.4471/ijep.2013.23

104.

Webb

J. T.

(2017, February). Cultivating courage, creativity, and caring, along with academic rigor and critical thinking. Keynote paper presented at the Annual Conference on Transformational Leadership: Inspirations and Issues in Gifted Education, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver, CO.

105.

White

B. A.

Frederiksen

J. R.

(1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3-118. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2

106.

Williams

Runco

M. A.

Berlow

(2016). Mapping the themes, impact, and cohesion of creativity research over the last 25 years. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 385-394. doi:10.1080/10400419.2016.1230358

107.

Winne

P. H.

(1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173-187. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3004_2

108.

Winne

P. H.

(1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 327-353. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90022-9

109.

Winne

P. H.

Hadwin

A. F.

(1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In Hacker

D. J.

Dunlosky

Graesser

A. C.

(Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

110.

Winne

P. H.

Hadwin

A. F.

(2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In Schunk

D. H.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and application (pp. 297-314). New York, NY: Routledge.

111.

Ybarra

Burnstein

Winkielman

Keller

M. C.

Manis

Chan

Rodriguez

(2008). Mental exercising through simple socializing: Social interaction promotes general cognitive functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 248-259. doi:10.1177/0146167207310454

112.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329

113.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In Zimmerman

B. J.

Schunk

D. H.

(Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

114.

Zimmerman

B. J.

Labuhn

A. S.

(2012). Self-regulation of learning: Process approaches to personal development. In Harris

K. R.

Graham

Urdan

McCormick

C. B.

Sinatra

G. M.

Sweller

(Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 399-425). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13273-014

115.

Zimmerman

B. J.

Martinez-Pons

(1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51