Dropping out of school represents the culmination of a process that begins long before a student enters high school. It is estimated that a quarter of students with high potential leave school without a high school diploma; however, research on how high-potential students uniquely experience dropping out of school is in its beginning stages. This study sought to acquire a rich understanding of how 14 gifted individuals who did not complete high school interpreted this experience and the meaning they attributed to it. Six major themes emerged from the data: (a) significant external circumstances, (b) need for support, (c) social influences, (d) outlets, (e) an alternate path, and (f) reflecting on the path. This exploratory study enhances our understanding of why gifted students choose to leave school and supports the validity of alternate paths to success.
CresswellJ. A. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
DolandE. (2001). Give yourself the gift of a degree. Washington, DC: Employment Policy Foundation.
6.
DollJ. J.EslamiZ. R.WaltersL. (2013). Understanding why students drop out of high school, according to their own reports: Are they pushed or pulled, or do they fall out? A comparative analysis of seven nationally representative studies. Sage Open, 3, 1-15.
7.
EntwisleD.AlexanderK.OlsonL. S. (2004). Temporary as compared to permanent high school dropout. Social Forces, 82, 1181-1205.
8.
FinnJ.PannozzoG. (1995). Disruptive and inattentive withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. Elementary School Journal, 95, 421-434.
9.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
HansenJ.TosoS. J. (2007). Gifted dropouts: personality, family, social, and school factors. Gifted Child Today, 30(4), 31-41.
12.
IngelsS. J.DaltonB. (2013). High school longitudinal study of 2009 (HSLS:09) first follow-up: A first look at fall 2009 ninth-graders in 2012 (NCES 2014-360). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
13.
JordanW. J.LaraJ.McPartlandJ. M. (1996). Exploring the causes of early dropout among race-ethnic and gender groups. Youth & Society, 28, 62-94.
14.
KanevskyL.KeighleyT. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26, 20-28.
15.
LandisR. N.ReschlyA. L. (2013). Re-examining gifted underachievement and dropout through the lens of student engagement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36, 220-249.
16.
LarkinM.WattsS.CliftonE. (2006). Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 102-120. http://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp062oa
17.
MatthewsM. S. (2006). Gifted students dropping out: Recent findings from a southeastern state. Roeper Review, 28, 216-223.
18.
MatthewsM. S. (2009). Gifted learners who drop out: Prevalence and prevention. In ShavininaL. V. (Ed.), The international handbook on giftedness (pp. 527-536). New York, NY: Springer Science.
19.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
PetersonJ. S. (2001). Successful adults who were once adolescent underachievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 236-250.
21.
PietkiewiczI.SmithJ. A. (2012). A practical guide to using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in qualitative research psychology. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 18, 361-369. doi:10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7
ReisS. M.McCoachD. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go?Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152-170.
24.
RemlerD. K.Van RyzinG. G. (2015). Research methods in practice (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
25.
RenzulliJ. S.ParkS. (2002). Giftedness and high school dropouts: Personal, family, and school related factors. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
26.
RoeseN. J.VohsK. D. (2012). Hindsight bias. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 411-426. doi:10.1177/1745691612454303
27.
RubensteinL. D.SchellingN.WilczynskiS. M.HooksE. N. (2015). Lived experiences of parents of gifted students with autism spectrum disorder: The struggle to find appropriate educational experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59, 283-298. doi:10.1177/0016986215592193
28.
SkladM. (2012). Motivation and construction of retrospective opinions. In MasmoudiS.DaiD. Y.NaceurA. (Eds.), Attention, representation, and human performance: Integration of cognition, emotion, and motivation (pp. 107-132). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
29.
SmithJ. A. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 39-54.
30.
StillwellR. (2010). Public school graduates and dropouts from the common core of data: School Year 2007–08 (NCES 2010-341). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2010341
31.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
SumA.KhatiwadaI.PondN.Trub’skyyM.FoggN.PalmaS. (2003). Left behind in the labor market: Labor market problems of the nation’s out-of-school, young adult populations. Boston, MA: Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.
33.
WattD.RoessinghH. (1994). Some you win, most you lose: Tracking ESL dropout in high school (1988-1993). English Quarterly, 26, 5-7.
34.
ZabloskiJ.MilacciF. (2012). Gifted dropouts: Phenomenological case studies of rural gifted students. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 6, 175-190.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
