The reciprocal effects model (REM) predicts a reciprocal relation between academic self-concept and academic achievement, whereby prior academic self-concept is associated with future gains in achievement, and prior achievement is related to subsequent academic self-concept. Although research in this area has been extensive, there has been a paucity of research specifically examining the REM from the standpoint of students who attend academically selective schools. The present research aimed to rectify this gap in the literature by testing the equivalence of the REM across a sample of high school students who attend both academically selective (n = 738) and mixed-ability comprehensive (n = 2,048) schools. Multigroup analyses revealed that the REM existed for both groups and that there were no differences between the groups in either the size or the direction of the paths that constitute the REM. Implications for REM theory and teaching practice are discussed.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.CampbellJ. D.KruegerJ. I.VohsK. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles?Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 1-44. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.01431
3.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
4.
CalsynR. J.KennyD. A. (1977). Self-concept of ability and perceived evaluation of others: Cause or effect of academic achievement?Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 136-145. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.69.2.136
5.
CampbellJ. R.WahlbergH. J. (2011). Olympiad studies: Competitions provide alternatives to developing talents that serve national interests. Roeper Review, 33, 8-17. doi:10.1080/02783193.2011.530202
6.
CarmanC. A. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: Fifteen years of definition of giftedness in research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24, 52-70. doi:10.1177/1932202X12472602
7.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
8.
ChenS.YehY.HwangF.LinS. S. J. (2013). The relationship between academic self-concept and achievement: A multicohort–multioccasion study. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 172-178. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.021
9.
CheungG. W.LauR. S. (2012). A direct comparison approach for testing measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 167-198. doi:10.1177/1094428111421987
10.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2001). The effects of model parsimony and sampling error on the fit of structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 236-264. doi:10.1177/109442810143004
11.
CravenR. G.MarshH. W.DebusR. (1991). Effects of internally focused feedback and attributional feedback on the enhancement of academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 17-26. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.17
12.
CurranP. J.BollenK. A. (2001). The best of both worlds: Combining autoregressive and latent curve models. In CollinsL. M.SayerA. G. (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 107-135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10409-004
13.
DavisJ. (1966). The campus as a frogpond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions for college men. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 17-31.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
GuayF.MarshH. W.BoivinM. (2003). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 124-136. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.124
18.
HongS.YooS.YouS.WuC. (2010). The reciprocal relationship between parental involvement and mathematics achievement: Autoregressive cross-lagged modeling. Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 419-439. doi:10.1080/00220970903292926
19.
How Your School Performed. (2012, December20). 2012 NSW honour roll. The Sydney Morning Herald, p. 2.
20.
HuangC. (2011). Self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of longitudinal relations. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 505-528. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.001
21.
HuguetP.DumasF.MarshH. W.RegnerI.WheelerL.SulsJ.. . . NezlekJ. (2009). Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE): An integrative study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 156-170. doi:10.1037/a0015558
22.
LitsterK.RobertsJ. (2011). The self-concepts and perceived competencies of gifted and non-gifted students: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11, 130-140. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01166.x
23.
MarshH. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280-295. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.280
24.
MarshH. W. (1990a). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 646-656. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.646
25.
MarshH. W. (1990b). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 623-636. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.623
26.
MarshH. W. (1991). Failure of high ability schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students’ ability levels. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 445-480. doi:10.3102/00028312028002445
27.
MarshH. W. (1992). Content specificity of relations between academic achievement and academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 35-42. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.35
28.
MarshH. W. (1993). The multidimensional structure of academic self-concept: Invariance over gender and age. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 841-860. doi:10.3102/00028312030004841
29.
MarshH. W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. Leicester, England: British Psychological Society.
30.
MarshH. W.ByrneB. M.YeungA. S. (1999). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: A reanalysis of a pioneering study and revised recommendations. Educational Psychologist, 34, 155-167. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_2
31.
MarshH. W.ChanalJ. P.SarrazinP. G. (2006). Self-belief does make a difference: A reciprocal effects model of the causal ordering of physical self-concept and gymnastics performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 101-111. doi:10.1080/02640410500130920
32.
MarshH. W.ChessorD.CravenR. G.RocheL. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285-319. doi:10.3102/00028312032002285
33.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2005). A reciprocal effects model of the causal ordering of self-concept and achievement: New support for the benefits of enhancing self-concept. In MarshH. W.CravenR. G.McInerneyD. M. (Eds.), International advances in self research: The new frontiers of self research (Vol. 2, pp. 15-51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
34.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133-163. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x
35.
MarshH. W.GerlachE.TrautweinU.LudtkeO.BrettschneiderW. (2007). Longitudinal study of preadolescent sport self-concept and performance: Reciprocal effects and causal ordering. Child Development, 78, 1640-1656. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01094.x
36.
MarshH. W.HauK. T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the internal/external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 56-67. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.56
37.
MarshH. W.HauK. T.KongC. K. (2002). Multilevel causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Influence of language of instruction (English compared with Chinese) for Hong Kong students. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 727-763. doi:10.3102/00028312039003727
38.
MarshH. W.O’MaraA. (2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 542-552. doi:10.1177/0146167207312313
39.
MarshH. W.PapaioannouA.TheodorakisY. (2006). Causal ordering of physical self-concept and exercise behavior: Reciprocal effects model and the influence of physical education teachers. Health Psychology, 25, 316-328. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.25.3.316
40.
MarshH. W.PerryC. (2005). Self-concept contributes to winning gold medals: Causal ordering of self-concept and elite swimming performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 27, 71-91.
41.
MarshH. W.RoweK. J. (1996). The negative effects of school-average ability on academic self-concept: An application of multilevel modeling. Australian Journal of Education, 40, 65-87. doi:10.1177/000494419604000105
42.
MarshH. W.SeatonM.TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.HauK. T.O’MaraA. J.CravenR. G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319-350. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6
43.
MarshH. W.TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.KöllerO.BaumertJ. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76, 397-416. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x
44.
MarshH. W.TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.KöllerO.BaumertJ. (2006). Integration of multidimensional self-concept and core personality constructs: Construct validation and relations to well-being and achievement. Journal of Personality, 74, 403-456. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00380.x
45.
MarshH. W.YeungA. S. (1997). Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 41-54. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.41
46.
McBurneyD. H. (1998). Research methods. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
MöllerJ.RetelsdorfJ.KöllerO.MarshH. W. (2011). The reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model: An integration of models of relations between academic achievement and self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1315-1346. doi:10.3102/0002831211419649
49.
MuijsR. D. (1997). Predictors of academic achievement and academic self-concept: A longitudinal perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 263-277. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01243.x
NeihartM.TeoC. T. (2013). Addressing the needs of the gifted in Singapore. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36, 290-306. doi:10.1177/0162353213494821
52.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). PISA 2003 Technical Report. Paris, France: Author.
53.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005a). PISA 2003 data analysis manual: SPSS users. Paris, France: Author.
54.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005b). PISA 2003 technical report. Paris, France: Author.
55.
PeughJ. L.EndersC. K. (2004). Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74, 525-556. doi:10.3102/00346543074004525
56.
PinxtenM.De FraineB.Van DammeJ.D’HaenensE. (2010). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Effects of type of achievement measure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 689-709. doi:10.1348/000709910X493071
57.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
RobitailleA.OpranaH.McIntoshC. N. (2012). Reciprocal relationship between social support and psychological distress among a national sample of older adults: An autoregressive cross-lagged model. Canadian Journal on Aging, 31, 13-24. doi:10.1017/S0714980811000560
59.
RubinD. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for non-response in surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470316696
60.
SeatonM.MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE) across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 403-419. doi:10.1037/a0013838
61.
SeatonM.MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2010). Big-fish-little-pond-effect: Generalizability and moderation—Two sides of the same coin. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 390-433. doi:10.3102/0002831209350493
62.
SeatonM.MarshH. W.YeungA.CravenR. G. (2011). The big fish down under: Examining moderators of the big-fish-little-pond effect for Australia’s high achievers. Australian Journal of Education, 55, 5-26. doi:10.1177/000494411105500202
63.
ShavelsonR. J.BolusR. (1982). Self-concept: The interplay of theory and methods. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 3-17. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.1.3
64.
ShavelsonR. J.HubnerJ. J.StantonG. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441. doi:10.3102/00346543046003407
65.
SkaalvikE. M.ValasH. (1999). Relations among achievement, self-concept, and motivation in mathematics and language arts: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 135-149. doi:10.1080/00220979909598349
66.
TomásI.MarshH. W.Gonzáles-RomáV.VallsV.NagengastB. (2014). Testing measurement invariance across Spanish and English versions of the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire: An application of exploratory structural equation modelling. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36, 179-188. doi:10.1123/jsep.2013-0070
67.
TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.KöllerO.BaumertJ. (2006). Self-esteem, academic self-concept, and achievement: How the learning environment moderates the dynamics of self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 334-349. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.334
68.
ValentineJ. C.DuBoisD. L. (2005). Effects of self-beliefs on academic achievement and vice versa. In MarshH. W.CravenR. G.McInerneyD. M. (Eds.), International advances in self research: The new frontiers of self research (Vol. 2, pp.53-78). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
69.
WilkinsonG. S.RobertsonG. J. (2006). Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT4). Lutz, FL: PAR.
70.
WilsonH. E.SiegleD.McCoachD. B.LittleC. A.ReisS. M. (2014). A model of academic self-concept: Perceived difficulty and social comparison among academically accelerated secondary school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 111-126. doi:10.1177/0016986214522858
71.
XuM. K. (2010). Frame of reference effects in academic self-concept: An examination of the big-fish-little-pond effect and the internal/external frame of reference model for Hong Kong adolescents (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oxford, England.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
