Using grounded theory, this study investigated primary caregivers’ perceptions of the role they play in influencing the academic success of students formally identified as twice-exceptional. Data from interviews were coded and analyzed for themes. Results indicated that primary caregivers (mothers) perceived that they played a major role in the academic success of their twice-exceptional children, first by recognizing their children’s gifts as well as disabilities and then by assuming responsibility for the development of their children’s potential. They sought professional evaluations, provided or secured educational supports, shaped their children’s healthy perceptions of their disabilities, and taught them how to advocate for themselves while simultaneously maintaining high expectations for their children, despite their disabilities. Implications of the findings are discussed, and areas for future research are outlined.
AssoulineS. G.Foley NicponM.HuberD. H. (2006). The impact of vulnerabilities and strengths on the academic experiences of twice-exceptional students: A message to school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 10, 14-24.
2.
BaumS. M.CooperC. R.NeuT. W. (2001). Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 477-490.
3.
BaumS. M.OwenS. V. (2004). To be gifted and learning disabled: Strategies for helping bright students with LD, ADHD, and more. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
4.
BiancoM.LeechN. L. (2010). Twice-exceptional learners: Effects of teacher preparation and disability labels on gifted referrals. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 319-334.
5.
BogdanR.BiklenS. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
BrodyL. E.MillsC. J. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 282-296.
CoffeyA.AtkinsonP. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary strategies. London, England: Sage.
9.
ColemanM. R. (2005). Academic strategies that work for gifted students with learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 28-32.
10.
CooperE. E.NessM.SmithM. (2004). A case study of a child with dyslexia and spatial-temporal gifts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 83-94. doi:10.1177/001698620404800202
CrimC.HawkinsJ.RubanL.JohnsonS. (2008). Curricular modifications for elementary students with learning disabilities in high-, average-, and low-IQ groups. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22, 233-245.
13.
CuffS. P.MooreC. G.McKeownR. E. (2005). Prevalence and correlates of ADHD symptoms in the National Health Interview Survey. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9, 392-401.
14.
Foley NicponM.AllmonA.SieckR.StinsonR. D. (2011). Empirical investigation of twice- exceptionality: Where have we been and where are we going?Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 3-17. doi:10.1177/0016986210382575
15.
FoxL. H.BrodyL.TobinD. (1983). Learning disabled gifted children: Identification and programming. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction.
18.
GoldbergR. J.HigginsE. L.RaskindM. H.HermanK. L. (2003). Predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: A qualitative analysis of a 20-year longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 222-236.
19.
HewardW. L. (2009). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
20.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
21.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, Part B (ages 3-32) and Part C (ages birth-2) regulations (2006).
22.
KingE. W. (2005). Addressing the social and emotional needs of twice-exceptional students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 16-20.
23.
LeCompteM. D.PreissleJ.TeschR. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24.
McCoachD. B.KehleT. J.BrayM. A.SiegleD. (2001). Best practices in the identification of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 403-411.
25.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
PayneS. (1999). Interviewing in qualitative research. In MemonA.BullR. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of interviewing (pp. 89-102). New York, NY: Wiley.
30.
ReisS. M.ColbertR. (2004). Counseling needs of academically talented students with learning disabilities. Professional School Counseling Journal, 8, 156-167.
31.
ReisS. M.McGuireJ. M.NeuT. W. (2000). Compensation strategies used by high-ability students with learning disabilities who succeed in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 123-134.
32.
ReisS. M.RubanL. (2005). Services and programs for academically talented students with learning disabilities. Theory Into Practice, 44, 148-159.
33.
SeidmanI. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
34.
SiegleD.McCoachD. B. (2005). Making a difference: Motivating gifted students who are not achieving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 22-27.
SilvermanL. K. (2009). The two edged-sword of compensation: How the gifted cope with learning disabilities. Gifted Education International, 25, 155-139.
37.
SoodakL. C. (2004). Parents and inclusive schooling: Advocating for an participating in the reform of special education. In DanforthS.TaffS. D. (Eds.), Crucial reading in special education (pp. 260-273). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
38.
SwansonJ. D. (2006). Breaking through assumptions about low-income, minority gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 11-25.
39.
ValleJ. W. (2011). Down the rabbit hole: A commentary about research on parents and special education. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 34, 183-190.
40.
WaggonerK.WilgoshL. (1990). Concerns of families of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(2), 97-98, 113.
41.
WeinfeldR.Barnes-RobinsonL.JewelerS.ShevitzB. R. (2002). Smart kids with learning difficulties. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
42.
YsselN. (2011). Twice-exceptional students. In CrossT. L.CrossJ. R. (Eds.), Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents (pp. 245-257). Austin, TX: Prufrock Press.
