The purpose of this Methodological Brief is to present a brief primer on logistic regression, a commonly used technique when modeling dichotomous outcomes. Using data from the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88), logistic regression techniques were used to investigate student-level variables in eighth grade (i.e., enrolled in a gifted class, gender, and socioeconomic status) that were associated with taking an Advanced Placement course in the 10th grade. Through the use of the NELS:88 data, the authors provide an example of how to interpret both categorical and continuous independent variables and illustrate how model fit can be assessed.
AgrestiA.FinlayB. (1997). Statistical methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
AiC.NortonE. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economic Letters, 80, 123-129.
3.
AllisonP. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
4.
BakerJ.BridgerR.EvansK. (1998). Models of underachievement among gifted preadolescents: The role of personal, family, and school factors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 5-15.
5.
ChaplinD. (2003). Hierarchical linear models: Strengths and weaknesses. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
6.
DeMarisA. (1995). A tutorial in logistic regression. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 956-968.
7.
FanX.NowellD. (2011). Using propensity score matching in educational research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 74-79. doi:10.1177/0016986210390635
8.
GrimmL. G.YarnoldP. R. (Eds.). (1995). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
GuoG.ZhaoH. (2000). Multilevel modeling for binary data. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 441-462.
10.
Hahs-VaughnD. (2005). A primer for using and understanding weights with national datasets. Journal of Experimental Education, 73, 221-248.
11.
HoetkerG. (2007). The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 331-343.
12.
HosmerD.LemeshowS. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
13.
JaccardJ. (2002). Interaction effects in logistic regression (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, No. 135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
KonstantopoulosS.ModiM.HedgesL. (2001). Who are America’s gifted?American Journal of Education, 3, 344-382.
15.
LibermanA. (2005). How much more likely? The implications of odds ratios for probabilities. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 253-266. doi:10.1177/1098214005275825
16.
LongS. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
McCoachB.SiegleD. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achievement gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 144-154.
MurnaneR.WillettJ. (2011). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
O’ConnellA. A. (2006). Logistic regression models for ordinal response variables (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, No. 146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
PetersonJ. S.RayK. (2006). Bullying and the gifted: Victims, perpetrators, prevalence, and effects. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 148-168.
22.
RaoC. R. (1973). Linear statistical inference and its applications. New York, NY: John Wiley.
23.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
24.
RenzulliJ.ParkS. (2000). Gifted dropouts: The who and the why. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 261-271.
25.
SwaminathanH.RogersH. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 361-370.
26.
WarneR.LazoM.RamosT.RitterN. (2012). Statistical methods used in gifted education journals, 2006-2010. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 134-149. doi:10.1177/0016986212444122
