In this article, the authors respond to the eight commentaries on “Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science” using several themes to organize their response. These themes include ability, developmental trajectories, effort and opportunity, psychosocial factors, eminence, and equity. The authors reaffirm the contention that eminence is an appropriate standard for assigning the gifted label in individuals with well-developed talents.
AudS.FoxM.KewalRamaniA. (2010). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups (NCES 2010-015; U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2.
BinetA.SimonT.KiteE. S. (1916). The intelligence of the feeble-minded. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
3.
BloomB. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1992). TIDE: Talent identification and development in education. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
6.
FlanaganJ. C. (1962). Project Talent. Applied Psychology, 11, 3-14.
7.
FreemanJ.RaffanJ.WarwickI. (2010). Worldwide provision to develop gifts and talents: An international survey. Berkshire, England: CfBT Education Trust. Retrieved from http://www.joanfreeman.com/freepublications.php
8.
GagnéF. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103-112. doi:10.1177/00169862850290030210.1177/001698628502900302
9.
GagnéF. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15, 119-147. doi:10.1080/135981304200031468210.1080/1359813042000314682
10.
GagnéF. (2009). Building gifts into talents: Detailed overview of the DMGT 2.0. In MacFarlaneB.StambaughT. (Eds.), Leading change in gifted education: The festschrift of Dr. Joyce VanTassel-Baska (pp. 61-80). Waco, TX: Prufrock.
11.
GladwellM. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
12.
GranthamT. C. (2012). Eminence-focused gifted education: Concern about forward movement void of an equity vision. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 215-220.
13.
HorowitzF. D.SubotnikR. F.MatthewsD. J. (Eds.). (2009). The development of giftedness and talent across the lifespan. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
JungJ. Y. (2012). Giftedness as a developmental construct which leads to eminence in adults: Ideas and implications from an occupational/career decision-making perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 189-193.
15.
LeeS.-Y.Olszewski-KubiliusP.PeternelG. (2009). Follow-up with students after 6 years of participation in Project EXCITE. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 137-156. doi:10.1177/001698620833056210.1177/0016986208330562
16.
MakelM. C.PutallazM.WaiJ. (2012). Teach students what they don’t know but are ready to learn: A commentary on “Rethinking giftedness and gifted education.”Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 198-201.
17.
McBeeM. T.McCoachD. B.PetersS. J.MatthewsM. S. (2012). The case for a schism: A commentary on Subotnik, Olsewski-Kubilius, and Worrell (2011). Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 210-214.
18.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2006). Addressing the achievement gap between minority and nonminority children: Increasing access and achievement through Project EXCITE. Gifted Child Today, 29(2), 28-37.
19.
PetersS. J.MannR. L. (2009). Getting ahead: Current secondary and postsecondary acceleration options for high-ability students in Indiana. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 630-657.
RinnA. N. (2012). Implications for addressing the psychosocial needs of gifted individuals: A response to Subotnik, Olszewski-Kubilius, and Worrell (2011). Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 206-209.
22.
RobinsonA. (2012). Psychological science, talent development, and educational advocacy: Lost in translation?Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 202-205.
23.
SimontonD. K.SongA. V. (2009). Eminence, IQ, physical and mental health, and achievement domain: Cox’s 282 geniuses revisited. Psychological Science, 20, 429-434. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02313.x10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02313.x
24.
SubotnikR. F. (1996). Talent developed: Conversations with masters of the arts and sciences. Calvin Butts: Spiritual leader and community activist. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 103-116.
25.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3-54. doi:10.1177/152910061141805610.1177/1529100611418056
26.
SubotnikR. F.RobinsonA.CallahanC. M.GubbinsE. J. (Eds.). (2012). Malleable minds: Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education. Storrs, CT: National Center for Research on Giftedness and Talent.
27.
SyedM. (2010). Bounce: Mozart, Federer, Picasso, Beckham, and the science of success. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
28.
VandenBosG. R. (2007). APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.Olszewski-KubiliusP.KuliekeM. (1994). A study of self-concept and social support in advantaged and disadvantaged seventh and eighth grade gifted students. Roeper Review, 16, 186-191. doi:10.1080/0278319940955357010.1080/02783199409553570
30.
WorrellF. C. (2003). Why are there so few African Americans in gifted programs? In YeakeyC. CHendersonR. D. (Eds.), Surmounting the odds: Education, opportunity, and society in the new millennium (pp. 423-454). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
31.
WorrellF. C. (2007). Ethnic identity, academic achievement, and global self-concept in four groups of academically talented adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 23-38. doi:10.1177/001698620629665510.1177/0016986206296655
32.
WorrellF. C.SzarkoJ. E.GabelkoN. H. (2001). Multi-year persistence of nontraditional students in an academic talent development program. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 80-89.
33.
ZieglerA. (2005). The actiotope model of giftedness. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 411-436). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
ZieglerA.StoegerH.VialleW. (2012). Giftedness and gifted education: The need for a paradigm change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 194-197.
