An Examination of the Relationships Between Ego Development,Dabrowski’s Theory of Positive Disintegration,and the Behavioral Characteristics of Gifted Adolescents

Abstract

Literature exploring the experiences of gifted individuals has often focused on asynchronous development, particularly during childhood and adolescence. Also discussed in the literature are the unique social, emotional, and behavioral characteristics associated with giftedness. However, there is still an unclear picture concerning the implications of this work as related to the specific counseling needs of gifted students, and little empirical support is provided. This study seeks to build, through a developmental lens, a more comprehensive base from which to design counseling and teaching approaches with gifted students. Findings indicate that the ego levels of gifted students are slightly higher than those of typical adolescents. Empirical evidence of the level of development related to Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration for gifted adolescents is provided, with the majority of respondents (70%) falling within Dabrowski’s Level II–Unilevel Disintegration stage. Results also indicated that the gifted students studied are relatively well adjusted and that the behaviors exhibited by gifted adolescents are normally distributed. Study results are interpreted as indicating that although ego development and Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration may share similarities, they are different constructs, and further investigation is needed to best use these theories in designing appropriate and effective counseling and teaching intervention strategies for working with gifted adolescents. Limitations of the study and suggestions for future research are presented.

Keywords

gifted students ego development Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration social and emotional development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

C. M.

(2009). The essential elements of Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration and how they are connected. Roeper Review, 31, 81-95.

American Counseling Association. (1995). Code of ethics and standards of practice. Alexandria, VA: Author.

American School Counselor Association. (2005). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.

Beran

T. N.

(2006). Test review: Clinical assessment of behavior. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 399-403.

Bloom

B. S.

(1985). Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.

Borders

L. D.

Fong

M. L.

(1989). Ego development and counseling ability during training. Counselor Education and Supervision, 29, 71-83.

Bracken

B. A.

Brown

E. F.

(2006). Behavioral identification and assessment of gifted and talented students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 112-122.

Bracken

B. A.

Keith

L. K.

(2004). Clinical assessment of behavior. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Brennan

T. P.

(1987). Case studies of multilevel development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

10.

Bursik

Martin

T. A.

(2006). Ego development and adolescent academic achievement. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 1-18.

11.

Cohn

L. D.

Westenberg

P. M.

(2004). Intelligence and maturity: Meta-analytic evidence for the incremental and discriminant validity of Loevinger’s measure of ego development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 760-772.

12.

Colangelo

Assouline

S. G.

(2000). Counseling gifted students. In Heller

K. A.

Monks

F. J.

Sternberg

R. J.

Subotnik

R. F.

(Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 595-607). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.

13.

Coleman

L. J.

Cross

T. L.

(1988). Is being gifted a social handicap? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11(4), 41-56.

14.

Coleman

L. J.

Cross

T. L.

(2001). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

15.

Coleman

L. J.

Cross

T. L.

(2005). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

16.

Columbus Group. (1991, July). Unpublished transcript of the meeting of the Columbus Group. Columbus, OH. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=574

17.

Cook-Greuter

S. R.

Soulen

(2007). The developmental perspective in integral counseling. Counseling and Values, 51, 180-192.

18.

Cross

T. L.

(2002). Competing myths about the social and emotional development of gifted students. Roeper Review, 25, 44-48.

19.

D’Andrea

(1984). Primary prevention and high risk populations. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 62, 554-559.

20.

Dabrowski

(1964). Positive disintegration. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

21.

Dabrowski

(1966). The theory of positive disintegration. International Journal of Psychiatry, 2, 229-244.

22.

Dabrowski

(1967). Personality-shaping through positive disintegration. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

23.

Dabrowski

(1970). Mental growth through positive disintegration. London, England: Gryf.

24.

Dabrowski

(1972). Psychoneurosis is not an illness. London, England: Gryf.

25.

Dabrowski

Piechowski

M. M.

(1977). Theory of levels of emotional development: From primary integration to self-actualization (Vol. 2). Oceanside, NY: Dabor Science.

26.

Daniels

Piechowski

M. M.

(2009). Living with intensity. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.

27.

Delisle

J. R.

(1990). The gifted adolescent at risk: Strategies and resources for suicide prevention among gifted youth. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13(3), 212-228.

28.

Delisle

J. R.

Galbraith

(2002). When gifted kids don’t have all the answers: How to meet their social and emotional needs.: Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.

29.

Dockery

D. J.

(2005). Ways in which counseling programs at specialized high schools respond to social and emotional needs of gifted adolescents (Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database (Publication No AAT 3161256).

30.

Foster

V. A.

Sprinthall

N. A.

(1992). Developmental profiles of adolescents and young adults choosing abortion: Stage sequence, décalage, and implications for policy. Adolescence, 27, 655-673.

31.

Gage

D. F.

Morse

P. A.

Piechowski

M. M.

(1981). Measuring levels of emotional development. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 103, 129-152.

32.

Gilmore

Durkin

(2001). A critical review of the validity of ego development theory and its measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 541-567.

33.

Greene

M. J.

(2003). Gifted adolescent social and emotional development: Teacher perceptions and practices (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (Publication No. AAT 3095831).

34.

Grimm

L. G.

Yarnold

P. R.

(2006). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

35.

Gross

(2002). Social and emotional issues for exceptionally intellectually gifted students. In Neihart

Reis

S. M.

Robinson

N. M.

Moon

S. M.

(Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 19-29). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

36.

Hauser

S. T.

Powers

S. I.

Noam

G. G.

(1991). Adolescents and their families: Paths of ego development. New York, NY: Free Press.

37.

Hauser

S. T.

Safyer

A. W.

(1994). Ego development and adolescent emotions. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4, 487-502.

38.

L. X.

Loevinger

(1996). Measuring ego development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

39.

Kane

(2009). Contemporary voices on Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration. Roeper Review, 31, 72-76.

40.

Lee

Snarey

(1988). The relationship between ego and moral development: A theoretical review and empirical analysis. In Lapsey

D. K.

Clark Power

(Eds.), Self, ego, and identity (pp. 151-208). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

41.

Levine

E. S.

Tucker

(1986). Emotional needs of gifted children: A preliminary, phenomenological view. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11, 156-165.

42.

Loevinger

(1976). Ego development: Conceptions and theories. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

43.

Loevinger

(1979). Construct validity of the sentence completion test of ego development. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 281-311.

44.

Loevinger

(1994). Has psychology lost its conscience? Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 2-8.

45.

Loevinger

Wessler

(1970). Measuring ego development: Construction and use of a Sentence Completion Test (Vol. 1). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

46.

Lovecky

D. V.

(1992). Exploring social and emotional aspects of giftedness in children. Roeper Review, 15, 18-25.

47.

Lysy

K. Z.

(1979). Personal growth in counselors and noncounselors: A Jungian and Dabrowskian approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Champaign.

48.

McDonald

(2006). The relationship between racial attitudes, ego developmental level and multicultural counseling knowledge and awareness in school psychologists (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA.

49.

Mendaglio

(Ed.). (2008). Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.

50.

Mendaglio

Tillier

(1992, September). Feeling bad can be good: Using Dabrowski’s theory to reframe gifted children’s adjustment difficulties. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual Society for the Advancement of Gifted Education Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

51.

Mika

(2002). Gifted children and overexcitabilities and a preliminary clinical study. In Duda

(Ed.), Positive disintegration: The theory of the future. 100th Dabrowski anniversary program on the man, the theory, the application and the future (pp. 323-336). Fort Lauderdale, FL: Fidlar Doubleday.

52.

Miller

N. B.

(1985). A content analysis coding system for assessing adult emotional development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Denver, Denver, CO.

53.

Miller

N. B.

(1991). Miller Assessment Coding System: Manual for rating levels of emotional development. Department of Sociology, University of Akron, Akron, OH.

54.

Miller

N. B.

Silverman

L. K.

(1987). Levels of personality development. Roeper Review, 9, 221.

55.

Mróz

(2009). Theory of positive disintegration as a basis for research on assisting development. Roeper Review, 31, 96-102.

56.

National Association for Gifted Children. (1995). Addressing affective needs of gifted children. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=384

57.

Neihart

Reis

S. M.

Robinson

N. M.

Moon

S. M.

(Eds.). (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

58.

Nelson

K. C.

(1989). Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration. Advanced Development, 1, 1-14.

59.

Noam

(1992). Development as the aim of clinical intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 679-696.

60.

Novy

D. M.

Francis

D. J.

(1992). Psychometric properties of the Washington University Sentence Completion Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1029-1039.

61.

O’Connor

K. J.

(2002). The application of Dabrowski’s theory to the gifted. In Neihart

Reis

S. M.

Robinson

N. M.

Moon

S. M.

(Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 51-60). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

62.

Ogburn-Colangelo

M. K.

(1979). Giftedness as multilevel potential: A clinical example. In Colangelo

Zaffrann

(Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 165-187). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.

63.

Piechowski

M. M.

(1975). A theoretical and empirical approach to the study of development. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 92, 231-297.

64.

Piechowski

M. M.

(1978). Self-actualization as a developmental structure: A profile of Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 97, 181-242.

65.

Piechowski

M. M.

(1990). Inner growth and transformation in the life of Eleanor Roosevelt. Advanced Development, 2, 35-53.

66.

Piechowski

M. M.

(1992). Etty Hillesum: “The thinking heart of the barracks.” Advanced Development, 4, 105-118.

67.

Piechowski

M. M.

(2003). From William James to Maslow and Dabrowski: Excitability of character and self-actualization. In Ambrose

Cohen

L. M.

Tannenbaum

A. J.

(Eds.), Creative intelligence: Toward theoretic integration (pp. 283-322). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

68.

Piechowski

M. M.

(2008). Discovering Dabrowski’s theory. In Mendaglio

(Ed.) Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration (pp. 41-78). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.

69.

Recklitis

C. J.

Noam

G. G.

(1999). Clinical and developmental perspectives on adolescent coping. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 30, 87-101.

70.

Robinson

N. M.

(2002). Individual differences in gifted students’ attributions for academic performances. In Neihart

Reis

S. M.

Robinson

N. M.

Moon

S. M.

(Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 61-69). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

71.

Robinson

N. M.

(2002). Introduction. In Neihart

Reis

S. M.

Robinson

N. M.

Moon

S. M.

(Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. xi-xxiv). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

72.

Silverman

L. K.

(1993). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver, CO: Love.

73.

Silverman

L. K.

(1997). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3-4), 36-58.

74.

Silverman

L. K.

(2002). Asynchronous development. In Neihart

Reis

S. M.

Robinson

N. M.

Moon

S. M.

(Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 31-37). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

75.

Silverman

L. K.

(2005). Intensitive! Intensities and sensitivities of the gifted. Social and emotional needs of gifted children. Hobart, Tasmania, Australia: Tasmanian Association for the Gifted.

76.

Silverman

L. K.

(2007). What we have learned about gifted children: 1979-2007. Denver, CO: Gifted Development Center.

77.

Sprinthall

N. A.

(1994). Counseling and social role taking: Promoting moral and ego development. In Rest

J. R.

Narváez

(Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 85-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

78.

Sword

(2001a). Emotional intensity in gifted children. Victoria, Australia: Gifted and Creative Services.

79.

Sword

(2001b). Psycho-social needs: Understanding the emotional, intellectual and social uniqueness of growing up gifted. Victoria, Australia: Gifted and Creative Services.

80.

Westenberg

P. M.

Block

(1993). Ego development and individual differences in personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 792–800.

81.

Westenberg

P. M.

Gjerde

P. F.

(1999). Ego development during the transition from adolescence to young adulthood: A 9-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 233-252.

82.

Westenberg

P. M.

Jonckheer

Treffers

P. D. A.

Drewes

M. J.

(1998). Ego development in children and adolescents: Another side of the impulsive, self-protective, and conformist ego levels. In Westenberg

P. M.

Blasi

Cohn

L. D.

(Eds.), Personality development: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical investigations of Loevinger’s conception of ego development (pp. 89-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

83.

White

M. S.

(1985). Ego development in adult women. Journal of Personality, 53, 561-574.