Cognitive and Psychosocial Characteristics of Gifted Students With Written Language Disability: A Reply to Lovett’s Response

Abstract

Our article describing the characteristics of gifted students with a specific learning disability (SLD) in written language was criticized for emphasizing an ability achievement discrepancy as an indication of a written language disability and for not ruling out alternative explanations for the observed difficulties. The three primary alternative explanations include measurement error, (lack of) motivation, and/or past experiences. In our reply, we offer extensive evidence that refutes these alternative explanations. The critique also offers an interpretation, which we determined to be inaccurate, of our data; therefore, we correct the misinterpretation. We conclude with a confirmation of our original findings: identification of gifted students with specific learning disabilities requires a comprehensive psycho-educational evaluation that includes an examination of the cognitive profile generated from individually-administered tests of ability and achievement. In combination with a psychosocial profile that addresses behavior, self-concept, interests, and motivation, educators have the necessary information to guide them in identifying and developing the unique talents of gifted children with SLD.

Keywords

gifted learning disabled disorder of written expression

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Assouline, S.G. , Foley Nicpon, M. , & Whiteman, C. ( 2010). Cognitive and psychosocial characteristics of gifted students with specific learning disabilities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 102-115.

Brennan, R. L. (Ed.). (2008). Educational measurement (4th ed.). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/ Praeger.

Feldt, L.S. , & Brennan, R.L. ( 1989). Reliability. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 105-146). New York, NY: Macmillan .

Haertel, E.H. ( 2008). Reliability. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 65-110). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.

Hale, J. , Alfonso, V. , Berninger, V. , Bracken, B. , Christo, C. , Clark, E. , . . Yalof, J. . (2010), Critical issues in response-to-intervention, comprehensive evaluation, and specific learning disabilities identification and intervention: An expert white paper consensus Learning Disability Quarterly , 33, 223-236

Lovett, B.J. , & Lewandowski, L.J. (2006). Gifted students with learning disabilities: Who are they? Journal of Learning Disabilities , 39, 515-527.

Lovett, B.J. , & Sparks, R. S. (2010). Exploring the diagnosis of "Gifted/LD": Characterizing postsecondary students with learning disability diagnoses at different IQ levels. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 91-101.

Pearson. (2009). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-III. San Antonio, TX: Author.

Psychological Corporation. (2002). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II. San Antonio, TX : Author.

10.

Sternberg, R.J. , & Grigorenko, E.L. (2002). Difference scores in the identification of children with learning disabilities: It’s time to use a different method. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 65-83.

11.

Wechsler, D. ( 1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

12.

Wechsler, D. ( 2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

13.

Woodcock, R.W. , McGrew, K.S. , & Mather, N. ( 2001). Woodcock- Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Ability. Itasca, IL: Riverside.