In a professional development project, six teaching practices were posited as necessary for improving affective and cognitive outcomes for identified advanced readers. These practices were identification, organization for instruction, content, instructional strategies, continuous improvement assessment, and ambassadorship. Sixty-one teachers received training in these practices and were evaluated on their implementation, with usable data from 37. Implementation ratings were correlated with measure of reading attitude and literary analysis. Several correlations were discovered that have implications for understanding teaching style and the influence of teacher practice on student outcomes.
Archambault, F.X., Jr. , Westberg, K.L., Brown, S.W., Hallmark, B.W., Zhang, W., & Emmons, C.L. (1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 103-119.
2.
Al-Lawati, F.A.K., & Hunsaker, S.L. (2007). Differentiation for the gifted in American Islamic schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 500-518.
3.
Fulcher, K.H., & Willse, J.T. ( 2007). Value added: Back to basics in measuring change. Assessment Update, 19, 10-12.
4.
Gentry, M., & Gable, R.K. ( 2001a). From the student’s perspective- My Class Activities: An instrument for use in research and evaluation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24, 322-343.
5.
Gentry, M., & Gable, R.K. ( 2001b). My class activities. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning.
6.
Hertzog, N.B. ( 2007). Transporting pedagogy: Implementing the project approach in two first-grade classrooms. Journal of Advanced Academics , 18, 530-564.
7.
Loucks-Horsely, S. ( 1996). Professional development for science education: A critical and immediate challenge. In R. Bybee (Ed.), National standards and the science curriculum: Challenges, opportunities, and recommendations (pp. 83-95). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt .
8.
Moon, T.R., Brighton, C.M., & Callahan, C.M. (2002). State standardized testing programs: Friend or foe of gifted education?Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement .
9.
Reis, S.M., Eckert, R.D., McCoach, D.B., Jacobs, J.K., & Coyne, M. ( 2008). Using enrichment reading practices to increase reading fluency, comprehension, and attitudes. Journal of Educational Research, 101, 299-315.
10.
Roberts, J.L., & Roberts, R. ( 1986). Differentiating inservice through teacher concerns about education for the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 107-109.
11.
Scholastic Inc. (1999). Scholastic reading inventory: Using the Lexile Framework™. New York, NY: Author.
12.
Scot, P.T., Callahan, C.M., & Urquhart, J. ( 2009). Paint-by-number teachers and cookie-cutter students: The unintended effects of high-stakes testing on the education of gifted students . Roeper Review, 31, 40-52.
13.
Swiatek, M.A., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2000). Gender differences in academic attitudes among gifted elementary students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 360-377.
14.
Sternberg, R.J. ( 1998). Ability testing, instruction, an assessment of achievement: Breaking out of the vicious cycle. NASSP Bulletin, 82(595), 4-10.1.
15.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Feng, A., McFarlane, B., Heng, M.A., Teo, C.T., Wong, M.L., . . . Khong, C. ( 2008). A cross cultural study of teachers’ instructional practices in Singapore and the United States. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 338-363.
16.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Feng, A.X., Brown, E., Bracken, B., Stambaugh, T., French McGowan, S., . . . Bai, W. ( 2008). A study of differentiated instructional change over three years. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 297-312.
17.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Zuo, L., Avery, L.D., & Little, C.A. ( 2002). A curriculum study of gifted-student learning in the language arts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 30-44.
18.
Westberg, K.L. ( 1995). Meeting the needs of the gifted in the regular classroom: The practices of exemplary teachers and schools. Gifted Child Today, 18, 27-29, 41.
19.
Westberg, K.L., Archambault, F.X., Jr. , Dobyns, S.M., & Salvin , T.J. (1993). The classroom practices observation study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 120-146.
20.
Wycoff, M., Nash, W.R., Juntune, J.E., & Mackay, L. ( 2003). Purposeful professional development: Planning positive experiences for teachers of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Today, 26, 34-41.
