Myth 6: Cosmetic Use of Multiple Selection Criteria

Abeel, L.B. , Callahan, C.M. , & Hunsacker, S.L. (1994). The use of published instruments in the identification of gifted students (National Association for Gifted Children Monograph; R. Friedman & R. Olenchak , Eds.). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.

Brown, S.W. , Renzulli, J.S. , Gubbins, E.J. , Siegle, D. , Zhang, W. , & Chen, C.-H. ( 2005). Assumptions underlying the identification of gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 68-79.

Callahan, C. M. (Ed.). (1993). Contexts for promise: Noteworthy practices and innovations in the identification of gifted students. Charlottesville, VA: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Virginia. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED372592)

Callahan, C.M. , Hunsaker, S.L. , Adams, C.M. , Moore, S.D. , & Bland, L.C. ( 1995). Instruments used in the identification of gifted and talented students (Research Monograph 95130). Storrs, CT : National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.

Gladwell, M. ( 2002). The tipping point. New York: Little, Brown.

Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Children’s Education Act: U.S. Congress, Public Law 100-297, April, 1988

Johnsen, S.K. ( 1997). Assessment: Beyond definitions. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 136-152.

Kumashiro, K.K. ( 2000). Toward a theory of anti-oppressive education. Review of Educational Research, 70, 25-53.

National Association for Gifted Children. ( 2009). State of the nation. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from http://www.nagc.org/

Renzulli, J.S. , & Purcell, J.C. ( 1996). Gifted education: A look around and a look ahead. Roeper Review, 18, 173-178.

Stephens, K.R. , & Karnes, F.A. ( 2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited . Exceptional Children, 66, 219-238.