The purpose of this study was to explore Vygotsky's notion of private speech as a cognitive self-regulatory process and how it related to creativity measures among at-risk children. Thirty-two Head Start and state-funded Pre-K children completed the Torrance creativity test Thinking Creatively in Action and Movement (TCAM). The children's private speech was collected in an open play context and while children completed structured logical— mathematical activities. Results revealed that both originality and fluency creativity were related to self-direction private speech and grand total private speech. Findings support that cognitive self-regulating private speech may be related to creative thinking and that private speech may offer a method for assessing early creative thinking in children from various cultural and economic backgrounds.
Amabile, T.M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 221-223.
2.
Behrend, D.A., Rosengren, K.S., & Perlmutter, M. (1989). A new look at children's private speech: The effects of age, task difficulty, and parental presence . International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 305-320.
3.
Berk, L.E. (1992). Private speech: An overview of theory and the status of research. In R. M. Diaz & L. E. Berk (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 17-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Berk L.E., & Garvin, R.A. (1984). Development of private speech among low income Appalachian children. Developmental Psychology, 20, 271-286.
5.
Berk, L.E., & Spuhl, S.T. (1995). Maternal interaction, private speech, and task performance in preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 145-169.
6.
Berk, L.E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
7.
Bivens, J.A., & Berk, L.E. (1990). A longitudinal study of the development of elementary school children's private speech. Merrill Palmer Quarterly , 36, 443-463.
8.
Bolen, L.M. (1976). Effects of race, sex, and kindergarten attendance on the creative thinking of second graders. Unpublished paper, Eastern Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
9.
Borkowski, J.G., & Peck, V.A. (1986). Causes and consequences of metamemory in gifted children. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 182-201). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Castellano, J.A., Fivus, A., & White, W. (2003). Serving the economically disadvantaged in gifted education. In J. A. Castellano (Ed.), Special populations in gifted education (pp. 135-149). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
Daugherty, M., & Logan, J. (1996). Private speech assessment: A medium for studying creative thinking in young children. Early Child Development and Care, 115, 97-102.
12.
Daugherty, M., White, C.S., & Manning, B.H. (1994). Relationships among private speech and creativity in young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 21-26.
13.
Dickson, K. (2003). Gifted education and African American learners . In J. A. Castellano (Ed.), Special populations in gifted education (pp. 45-63). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
Duncan, R.M., & Pratt, M.W. (1997). Microgenetic change in the quantity and quality of preschoolers' private speech. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20(2), 367-383.
15.
Ehrlich, V.Z. (1986). Recognizing superior cognitive abilities in disadvantaged, minority, and other diverse populations. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 18, 55-70.
16.
Erickson, J.G. (1977). A study of the verbal productive humor of preschool children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38A, 5999. (UMI No. 78-03984)
17.
Glascoe, F.P. (1996). Can the BRIGANCE screens detect children who are gifted and academically talented?Roeper Review, 19(1), 20-25.
18.
Greenberg, J.W., Shore, M.S., & Davidson, H.H. (1972). Caution and creativity as correlates of achievement in disparate social-racial groups. Journal of Negro Education, 41(4), 377-382.
19.
Guilford, J.P. (1975). Factors and factors of personality. Psychological Bulletin,82(5), 802-814.
20.
Guilford, J.P., & Christensen, P.R. (1973). The one-way relation between creative potential and IQ. Journal of Creative Behavior, 7, 247-252.
21.
Haley, G.A. (1978). Training advantaged and disadvantaged Black kindergarteners in sociodrama: Effects on creativity and free recall variables of oral language . Dissertation Abstracts International, 39A, 4139. (UMI No. 79-01642)
22.
Karnes, M.B., & Johnson, L.J. (1986). Identification and assessment of gifted/talented handicapped and non-handicapped children in early childhood. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 18, 35-54.
23.
Khatena, J. (1989). Intelligence and creativity to multitalent. Journal of Creative Behavior, 23, 93-97.
24.
Mang, M.E. (1998). The social origins of preschoolers' private speech: Self regulation via internalized social discourse. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities &Social Sciences , 59(3-A), 0720.
25.
Matuga, J.M. (2004). Situated creative activity: The drawings and private speech of young children. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 267-281.
26.
Miller, B.C., & Gerard, D. (1979). Family influences on the development of creativity in children: An integrative review. The Family Coordinator , 28(3), 295-312.
27.
Morgan, G. (1990). Influence of intelligence and creativity on balance scale task performance of 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Georgia, Athens .
28.
Moss, E. (1990). Social interaction and metacognitive development in gifted preschoolers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 16-20.
29.
Plucker, J.A., & Runco, M.A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21, 36-39.
30.
Reisman, F.K., Pellegrini, A.D., Paguio, L., Floyd, B., & Torrance, E.P. (1980). Performance on Torrance's Thinking Creatively in Action and Movement as a predictor of cognitive development. Unpublished research report, Department of Early Childhood and Elementary Education, University of Georgia.
31.
Shore, B.M. (2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative differences in how gifted children think. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding (pp. 167-187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
Simonton, D.K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151-158.
33.
Sternberg, R.J. (1988). Three-facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 125-147). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Torrance, E.P. (1971). Are the Torrance tests of creative thinking biased against or in favor of “disadvantaged” groups?Gifted Child Quarterly, 15, 75-80.
36.
Torrance, E.P. (1979). The search for satori and creativity. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Ltd.
37.
Torrance, E.P. (1981). Thinking Creatively in Action and Movement. Bensenville: Illinois Scholastic Testing Service.
38.
Torrance, E.P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing . In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 43-75). New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language, trans. A. Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published in 1934)
40.
Winsler, A., Diaz, R.M., & Montero, I. (1997). The role of private speech in the transition from collaborative to independent task performance in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 59-79.
41.
Winsler, A., & Naglieri, J. (2000). Overt and covert verbal problem-solving strategies: Developmental trends in use, awareness, and relations with task performance . Child Development, 74(3), 659-678.
