Ablard, K. (1997). Self-perceptions and needs as a function of type of academic ability and gender. Roeper Review, 20, 110-115.
2.
Ablard, K.E., & Tissot, S.L. (1998). Young students' readiness for advanced math: Precocious abstract reasoning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted , 21, 206-223.
3.
Albert, R., & Runco, M. (1989). Independence and the creative potential of gifted and exceptionally gifted boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence , 18, 221-230.
4.
Albert, R.S. (1996). What the study of eminence can teach us. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 307-315.
5.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives . New York: Longman.
6.
Arnold, K. D., & Subotnik, R. F. (Eds.). (1994). Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7.
Association for the Gifted. (2001, April). Diversity and developing gifts and talents: A national action plan. Washington, DC: Author.
8.
Artiles, A. J., & Zamora-Duran, G. (Eds.). (1997). Reducing disproportionate representation of culturally diverse students in special and gifted education . Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
9.
Baldwin, A.Y. (2002). Culturally diverse students who are gifted. Exceptionality, 10, 139-147.
10.
Baran, J.H., & Bernal, E.M. (1991). Gifted education for bilingual and limited English proficient students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 144-147.
11.
Baum, S.M., & Olenchak, F.R. (2002). The alphabet children: GT, ADHD, and more. Exceptionality, 10, 77-91.
Belcher, R., & Fletcher-Carter, R. (1999). Growing gifted students in the desert: Using alternative, community-based assessment and an enriched curriculum. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32, 17-24.
14.
Benbow, C.P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D.L., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11, 474-480.
15.
Berger, S. (2003). Technology and gifted learners. In W. A. Owings & L. S. Kaplan (Eds.), Best practices, best thinking, and emerging issues in school leadership (pp. 177-190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
16.
Betts, G. (2004). Fostering autonomous learners through levels of differentiation. Roeper Review, 26, 190-191.
17.
Betts, G.T., & Neihart, M. (1986). Implementing self-directed learning models for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 174-177.
18.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
19.
Boothe, D., Sethna, B., Stanley, J.C., & Colgate, S. (1999). Special opportunities for exceptionally able high school students: A description of eight residential early-college entrance programs. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 10, 195-202.
20.
Boothe, D., & Stanley, J. C. (Eds.). (2004). In the eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity in gifted education. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Brody, L. (1999). The talent searches: Counseling and mentoring activities. In N. Colangelo & S. Assouline (Eds.), Talent development III, Proceedings from the 1995 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 153-157). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
23.
Brody, L., & Mills, C. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(3), 282-286.
24.
Callahan, C., Cooper, C., & Glascock, R. (2003). Preparing teachers to develop and enhance talent: The position of national education organizations. Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education . (ERIC Document Services No. ED477882)
25.
Castellano, J.A. (1998). Identifying and assessing gifted and talented bilingual Hispanic students (Report No. EDO-RC-97-9). Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED. 423104)
26.
Castellano, J. A., & Diaz, E. I. (Eds.). (2002). Reaching new horizons: Gifted and talented education for culturally and linguistically diverse students . Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
Castillo, L.C. (1998). The effect of analogy instruction on young children's metaphor comprehension. Roeper Review, 21, 27-31.
28.
Cattell, R.B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1-22.
29.
Cattell, R.B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth and action . Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
30.
Center for Gifted Education. (2000). Center for Gifted Education research model. Williamsburg, VA: College of William and Mary, Author.
31.
Choi, E.Y. (1998). Through another's eyes: Student fear number one. GiftedChild Today, 21(4), 30-31, 48.
32.
Christopersen, E., & Mortweet, S. (2003). Encouraging independent play skills. In R. Christophersen & S. Mortweet (Eds.), Parenting that works: Building skills that last a lifetime (pp. 195-205). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33.
Clark, G. (2004). Screening and identifying students talented in the visual arts: Clark's Drawing Abilities Test. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Identification of students for gifted and talented programs (pp. 101-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
34.
Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (1997). Project ARTS: Programs for ethnically diverse, economically disadvantaged, high ability, visual arts students in rural communities: Identification, curriculum, evaluation. Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 419765)
35.
Cline, S., & Hegeman, J. (2001). Gifted children with disabilities. Overcoming stereotypes. GiftedChild Today, 24(3), 16-24.
36.
Cline, S., & Schwartz, D. (2000). Diverse populations of gifted children: Meeting their needs in the regular classroom and beyond. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
Cohen, L.M. (1990). Meeting the needs of gifted and talented minority language students. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children and ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED. 321485)
38.
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & Gross, M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (Vol. II). Iowa City, IA: Belin & Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
39.
Coleman, L.J. (2004). Is consensus on a definition in the field possible, desirable, necessary?Roeper Review, 27, 10-11.
40.
Coleman, M.R., & Gallagher, J.J. (1995). State identification policies: Gifted students from special populations. Roeper Review, 17, 268-275.
41.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2003). What every special educator must know: Ethics, standards, and guidelines for special educators (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
42.
Cross, T., Stewart, R.A., & Coleman, L. (2003). Phenomenology and its implications for gifted studies research: Investigating the Lebenswelt of academically gifted students attending an elementary magnet school. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 201-220.
43.
Cross, T.L. (2004). Technology and the unseen world of gifted students. GiftedChild Today, 27(4), 14-15, 63-65.
44.
Cross, T.L., & Coleman, L.J. (1993). The social cognition of gifted adolescents: An exploration of the stigma of giftedness paradigm. Roeper Review , 16, 37-40.
45.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325-339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology and discovery of invention. New York: Harper Books .
47.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2000). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 81-93). New York: Pergamon .
48.
Cunningham, C.M., Callahan, C.M., Plucker, J.A., Roberson, S.C., & Rapkin, A. (1998). Identifying Hispanic students of outstanding talent: Psychometric integrity of a peer nomination form. Exceptional Children, 64, 197-209.
49.
Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach?Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 286-302.
50.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A., & Klein, S. (1999). A license to teach, raising standards for teaching . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51.
Daugherty, M., White, C.S., & Manning, B.H. (1994). Relationships among private speech and creativity measurements of young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 21-26.
52.
Davalos, R., & Haensly, P. (1997). After the dust has settled: Youth reflect on their high school mentored research experience. Roeper Review, 19, 204-207.
53.
Delisle, J., & Galbraith, J. (2002). When gifted kids don't have all the answers: How to meet their social and emotional needs. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
54.
Diaz, E.I. (1998). Perceived factors influencing the academic underachievement of talented students of Puerto Rican descent. Gifted Child Quarterly42, 105-122.
55.
Dixon, F.A., Lapsley, D., & Hanchon, T.A. (2004). An empirical typology of perfectionism in gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 95-106.
56.
Dole, S. (2000). The implications of the risk and resilience literature for gifted students with learning disabilities. Roeper Review , 23, 91-96.
57.
Dunn, R., Griggs, S., & Price, G. (1993). The learning styles of gifted and talented adolescents in the United States. In R. Dunn, R. Milgram, & G. Price (Eds.), Teaching and counseling gifted and talented adolescents: An international perspective (pp. 119-136). Westport, CT: Praeger.
58.
Education of the Handicapped Act, Pub. L. 91-230 (1970, April).
59.
Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2003). Analytic thinking: How to take thinking apart and what to look for when you do. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
60.
Emerick, L.J. (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students' perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 140-146.
61.
Ericcson, K.A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition . American Psychologist, 49, 725-747.
62.
Feistritzer, E., & Chester, D. (2000). Alternative teacher certification: A state-by-state analysis 2000. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information.
63.
Feldhusen, J.F. (1996). Is it acceleration or simply appropriate instruction for precocious youth?Teaching Exceptional Children, 28, 48-51.
64.
Feldhusen, J.F., Asher, J.W., & Hoover, S.M. (2004). Problems in the identification of giftedness, talent, or ability. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Identification of students for gifted and talented programs (pp. 79-85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
65.
Feldhusen, J.F., & Kennedy, D.M. (1988). Preparing gifted youth for leadership roles in a rapidly changing society. Roeper Review, 10, 226-230.
66.
Feldman, D. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
67.
Fernández, A.T., Gay, L.R., Lucky, L.F., & Gavilan, M.R. (1998). Teacher perceptions of gifted Hispanic limited English proficient students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 335-351.
68.
Ford, D. (1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted black students: Promising practices and programs. New York: Teachers College Press.
69.
Ford, D., & Harris, J., III. (2000). A framework for infusing multicultural curriculum into gifted education. Roeper Review, 23, 4-10.
70.
Ford, D.Y. (2004). Intelligence testing and cultural diversity: Concerns, cautions, and considerations (RM04204). Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
71.
Ford, D.Y., & Grantham, T.C. (2003). Parenting gifted culturally diverse children: Focus on education-related issues and needs. Understanding Our Gifted, 15(4), 12-17.
72.
Ford, D.Y., & Harris, J., III. (1997). A study of the racial identity and achievement of Black males and females. Roeper Review, 20, 105-110.
73.
Ford, D.Y., & Russo, C.J. (1995). Meeting the educational needs of the gifted: A legal imperative. Roeper Review, 17, 224-228.
74.
Ford, D.Y., & Thomas, A. (1997). Underachievement among gifted minority students: Problems and promise. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (ERIC Digest E544)
75.
Ford, D.Y., & Trotman, M.F. (2001). Teachers of gifted students: Suggested multicultural characteristics and competencies. Roeper Review, 23, 235-239.
76.
Frasier, M.M. (1991). Disadvantaged and culturally diverse gifted students . Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 234-245.
77.
Frasier, M.M., Hunsaker, S.L., Lee, J., Finley, V.S., Frank, E., & Garcia, J.H. (1995). Educators' perceptions of barriers to the identification of gifted children from economically disadvantaged and limited English proficient backgrounds (Report RM-95216). Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
78.
Freeman, K.A., & Walberg, H.J. (1999). Childhood traits and conditions of eminent African American women. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 402-419.
79.
Frey, C.P. (1998). Struggling with identity: Working with seventh- and eighth-grade gifted girls to air issues of concern. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 437-451.
80.
Frey, C.P. (2000). A writer's workshop for highly verbal students. GiftedChild Today, 23(5), 38-43.
81.
Gagné, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103-112.
82.
Gagné, F. (1995). From giftedness to talent: A developmental model and its impact on the language of the field. Roeper Review , 18, 103-111.
83.
Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 60-74). New York: Pearson.
84.
Gagné, R.J. (2000). Understanding the complex choreography of talent development. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 67-79). New York: Pergamon.
85.
Gallagher, S. (1997). Problem-based learning: Where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it going?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 332-362.
86.
Gallagher, S.A., & Stepien, W. (1996). Content acquisition in problem-based learning: Depth versus breadth in American studies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 257-275.
87.
Galton, F. (1865). Hereditary talent and character. Macmillan's Magazine, 12, 157-166, 318-327.
88.
Gardner, H. (1994). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences . New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1983)
89.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Fred, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.
90.
Garrison, L. (1993). Professionals of the future: Will they be female? Will they be ethnically diverse?Roeper Review, 15, 161-164.
91.
Gay, G. ( 2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 106-116.
92.
Gentry, M. (1999). Promoting student achievement and exemplary classroom practices through cluster grouping: A research-based alternative to heterogeneous elementary classrooms. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
93.
Gonzalez, V. (1996). Theoretical and practical implications of assessing cognitive and language development in bilingual children with qualitative methods. Bilingual Research Journal, 20, 96-131.
94.
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents' standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645-662.
95.
Grantham, T.C., & Ford, D.Y. (1998). A case study of the social needs of Danisha: An underachieving gifted African-American female. Roeper Review , 21, 96-101.
96.
Grantham, T.C., & Ford, D.Y. (2003). Beyond self-concept and self esteem: Racial identity and gifted African American students. High School Journal , 87, 18-29.
97.
Greene, M. (2003). Gifted adrift? Career counseling of the gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 25, 66-72.
98.
Gross, M.U.M. (2000). Issues in the cognitive development of exceptionally and profoundly gifted individuals. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 179-192). New York: Pergamon.
99.
Gross, M.U.M. (2002). Musings: Gifts to the gifted—training our teachers. Understanding Our Gifted, 15(1), 25-27.
Grybe, D. (1997). Mentoring the gifted and talented. Preventing School Failure, 41, 115-119.
102.
Gubbins, E.J., Westberg, K.L., Reis, S.M., Dinnocenti, S.T., Tieso, C.L., & Muller, L.M. (2002). Implementing a professional development model using gifted education strategies with all students (Report RM02172). Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
103.
Guilford, J.P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw Hill.
104.
Guskey, T.R. (1998, April). Teacher efficacy measurement and change . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED422396)
105.
Hansen, J.B., & Feldhusen, J.F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly , 38, 115-123.
106.
Harmon, D. (2002). They won't teach me: The voices of gifted African American inner-city students. Roeper Review, 24, 68-75.
107.
Hébert, T. (2002). Educating gifted children from low socioeconomic backgrounds: Creating visions of a hopeful future. Exceptionality , 10, 127-138.
108.
Hébert, T.P. (1991). Meeting the affective needs of bright boys through bibliotherapy. Roeper Review, 13, 207-212.
109.
Hébert, T.P. (1993). Reflections at graduation: The long-term impact of elementary school experiences in creative productivity. Roeper Review, 16, 22-28.
110.
Hébert, T.P. (1998). Gifted Black males in an urban high school: Factors that influence achievement and underachievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 385-414.
111.
Hébert, T.P., & Neumeister, K.L.S. (2000). University mentors in the elementary classroom: Supporting the intellectual, motivational, and emotional needs of high-ability students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24, 122-148.
112.
Hertzog, N., & Bennett, T. (2004). In whose eyes? Parents' perspectives on the learning needs of their gifted children. Roeper Review, 26, 96-104.
Hollingworth, L.S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ. Yonkers, NY: World Book.
115.
Hughes, L. (1999). Action research and practical inquiry: How can I meet the needs of the high-ability student within my regular education classroom?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 282-297.
116.
Hunsaker, S. (1995). Family influences on the achievement of economically disadvantaged students: Implications for gifted identification and programming (Research Monograph 95206). Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
117.
Hunsaker, S.L., & Callahan, C.M. (1995). Creativity and giftedness: Published instrument uses and abuses. Gifted Child Quarterly , 39, 110-114.
118.
Hyde, J.S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., & Frost, L.A. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 299-324.
119.
Ingram, M.A. (2003). Sociocultural poetry to assist gifted students in developing empathy for the lived experiences of others. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 14, 83-90.
120.
Irvine, D.J. (1991). Gifted education without a state mandate: The importance of vigorous advocacy. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 196-199.
121.
Jatko, B.P. (1995). Action research and practical inquiry: Using a whole class tryout procedure for identifying economically disadvantaged students in three socioeconomically diverse schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 83-105.
122.
Johnsen, S., & Goree, K. (2005). Teaching gifted students through independent study . In F. Karnes & S. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted and talented (pp. 379-408). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
123.
Johnsen, S. K. (Ed.). (2004a). Identifying gifted students: A practical guide. Waco, TX : Prufrock Press.
124.
Johnsen, S.K. (2004b). Performance assessment plan for gifted and talented education program. Program for preparing school professionals submitted and approved by the Council for Exceptional Children and nationally recognized by NCATE. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Educational Psychology, Baylor University, Waco.
125.
Johnsen, S.K., & Ryser, G. (1994). Identification of young gifted children from lower income families. Gifted and Talented International, 9(2), 62-68.
Johnson, N. (1994). Understanding gifted underachievers in an ethnically diverse population. Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED368101)
128.
Kanevsky, L., & Keighley, T. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26, 20-28.
129.
Kaplan, S. (2005). Layering differentiated curricula for the gifted and talented. In F. Karnes & S. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 107-132). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
130.
Karnes, F.A., & Marquardt, R.G. (1991). Gifted children and the law. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
131.
Karnes, F.A., & Marquardt. R.G. (1997a). The fragmented framework of legal protection for the gifted. Peabody Journal of Education , 72(3/4), 166-179.
132.
Karnes, F.A., & Marquardt, R. (1997b). Know your legal rights in gifted education. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (ERIC Digest E541)
133.
Karnes, F.A., & Marquardt, R.G. (2000). Gifted children and legal issues: An update. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
134.
Karnes, F.A., Meriweather, S., & D'Ilio, V. (1987). The effectiveness of the leadership studies program . Roeper Review, 9, 238-241.
Kennedy, D. (1995). Glimpses of a highly gifted child in a heterogeneous classroom. Roeper Review, 17, 164-168.
137.
Kerr, B., & Cohn, S. (2001). Smart boys: Talent, manhood, and the search for meaning. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
138.
Kerr, B., & Kurpius, S. (2004). Encouraging talented girls in math and science: Effects of a guidance intervention. High Ability Studies, 15, 85-102.
139.
Kerr, B., & Sodano, S. (2003). Career assessment with intellectually gifted students . Journal of Career Assessment, 11, 168-186.
140.
Kingore, B. (1995). Introducing parents to portfolio assessment: A collaborative effort toward authentic assessment. GiftedChild Today, 18(4), 12-13, 40.
141.
Kirschenbaum, R.J. (2004). Dynamic assessment and its use with underserved gifted and talented populations. In A. Baldwin & S. Reis (Eds.), Culturally diverse and underserved populations of gifted students. Essential reading in gifted education (pp. 49-62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
142.
Kitano, M. (1997). Gifted African American women. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 254-287.
143.
Kitano, M.K., & Espinosa, R. (1995). Language diversity and giftedness: Working with gifted English language learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 234-254.
144.
Kitano, M.K., & Pedersen, K.S. (2002). Action research and practical inquiry: Teaching gifted English learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 132-147.
145.
Kitano, M., & Perkins, C. (1996). International gifted women: Developing a critical human resource. Roeper Review. 19, 34-40.
146.
Kolesinski, M.T., & Leroux, J.A. (1992). The bilingual education experience, French-English, Spanish-English: From a perspective of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14, 221-224.
147.
Kulik, J.A. (1992). An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives (RBDM 9204). Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Landau, E., & Weissler, K. (1998). The relationship between emotional maturity, intelligence and creativity in gifted children. Gifted Education International , 13, 100-105.
150.
Landrum, M.S. (2003). Consultation in gifted education: Teachers working together to serve students. Mansfield, CT: CreativeLearning .
151.
Limburg-Weber, L. (1999/2000). Send them packing: Study abroad as an option for gifted students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 43-51.
152.
Louis, B., & Lewis, M. (1992). Parental beliefs about giftedness in young children and their relation to actual ability level. Gifted Child Quarterly , 36, 27-31.
153.
Lovecky, D. (1995). Ramifications of giftedness for girls. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 6, 157-164.
154.
Lupkowski-Shoplik, A.E., & Assouline, S.G. (1994). Evidence of extreme mathematical precocity: Case studies of talented youths. Roeper Review , 16, 144-151.
155.
Lynch, S.J. (1992). Fast-paced high school science for the academically talented: A six-year perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 147-154.
156.
Maker, J. (1994). Authentic assessment of problem solving and giftedness in secondary school students. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 6, 19-29.
157.
Marland, S.P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. commissioner of education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
158.
Masten, W.G., & Plata, M. (2000). Acculturation and teacher ratings of Hispanic and Anglo-American students. Roeper Review, 23, 45-46.
159.
Matthews, P.H., & Matthews, M.S. (2004). Heritage language instruction and giftedness in language minority students: Pathways toward success. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 15, 50-55.
160.
McLaughlin, S.C., & Saccuzzo, D.P. (1997). Ethnic and gender differences in locus of control in children referred for gifted programs: The effects of vulnerability factors. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 268-284.
161.
Melber, L.M. (2003). Partnerships in science learning: Museum outreach and elementary gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 251-258.
162.
Melear, C.T., & Alcock, M.W. (1999). Learning styles and personality types of African American children: Implications for science education. Journal of Psychological Type, 48, 22-33.
163.
Mendaglio, S. (1995). Sensitivity among gifted persons: A multifaceted perspective. Roeper Review, 17, 69-72.
164.
Milgram, R.M., Hong, E., Shavit, Y.W., & Peled, R.W. (1997). Out-of-school activities in gifted adolescents as a predictor of vocational choice and work accomplishment in young adults. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 8, 111-120.
165.
Mills, C.J., Stork, E.J., & Krug, D. (1992). Recognition and development of academic talent in educationally disadvantaged students. Exceptionality, 3, 165-180.
166.
Milne, H., & Reis, S. (2000). Using video therapy to address the social and emotional needs of gifted children. GiftedChild Today, 23(1), 24-29.
167.
Miserandino, A.D., Subotnik, R.F., & Ou, K. (1995). Identifying and nurturing mathematical talent in urban school settings. Journal for Secondary GiftedEducation , 6, 245-257.
168.
Moon, S. (Ed.). (2004). GCQ seminal articles. Socio-emotional issues, underachievement, counseling of gifted and talented students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
169.
Moon, S.M., Feldhusen, J.F., & Dillon, D.R. (1994). Long-term effect of an enrichment program based on the Purdue three-stage model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 38-48.
170.
Moon, S.M., Jurich, J.A., & Feldhusen, J.F. (1998). Families of gifted children: Cradles of development. In R. C. Friedman & K. Rogers (Eds.), Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on giftedness (pp. 81-99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
171.
Moon, T.R., & Callahan, C.M. (2001). Curricular modifications, family outreach, and a mentoring program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24, 305-321.
172.
Morehead, M.A. (1998). Professional behaviors for the beginning teacher . American Secondary Education, 26(4), 22-26.
173.
Myers, W.A. (1993/1994). Two plus two does not always equal four (years). Journal for Secondary GiftedEducation , 5(2), 27-30.
174.
Naglieri, J.A., & Ford, D.Y. (2003). Addressing underrepresentation of gifted minority children using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT). Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 155-160.
175.
National Association for Gifted Children and the Council of State Directors of Programs for of the Gifted. (2005). 2004-2005 state of the states: A report by the National Association for Gifted Children and the Council of State Directors of Programs. Washington, DC: Author.
176.
Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say?Roeper Review, 22, 10-17.
177.
Norton, D.E., & Norton, S. (2002). Through the eyes of a child: An introduction to children's literature (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
178.
Nugent, S.A. (2005). Affective education: Addressing the social and emotional needs of gifted students in the classroom. In F. Karnes & S. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (2nd ed., pp. 409-438). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
179.
Ogbu, J. (1995). Understanding cultural diversity and learning . In J. A. E. Banks & C. A. M. E. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 582-583). Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED382727)
180.
Ogbu, J.U. (1994). Understanding cultural diversity and learning . Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 355-383.
181.
Olenchak, R. (1994). Talent development: Accommodating the social and emotional needs of secondary gifted/learning disabled students. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 5, 40-52.
182.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998a). Early entrance to college: Students' stories. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 10, 226-247.
183.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998b). Research evidence regarding the validity and effects of talent search educational programs. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 9, 134-138.
184.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Laubscher, L. (1996). The impact of a college-counseling program on economically disadvantaged gifted students and their subsequent college adjustment . Roeper Review, 18, 202-208.
185.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Lee, S.Y. (2004). Parent perceptions of effects of the Saturday Enrichment Program on gifted students' talent development. Roeper Review, 26, 156-165.
186.
Oreck, B.A., Owen, S.V., & Baum, S.M. (2003). Validity, reliability, and equity issues in an observational talent assessment process in the performing arts. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27, 62-94.
187.
Parker, J. (1996). NAGC standards for personnel preparation in gifted education: A brief history. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 158-164.
Passow, A.H., & Frasier, M.M. (1994). Toward improving identification of talent potential among minority and disadvantaged students. Roeper Review, 18, 198-202.
190.
Pearl, P. (1997). Why some parent education programs for parents of gifted children succeed and others do not. Early Child Development and Care, 130, 41-48.
191.
Perry, T., Steele, C., & Hilliard, A. (2003). Young, gifted and black. Promoting high achievement among African-American students. Boston: Beacon.
192.
Peterson, J.S. (2003). An argument for proactive attention to affective concerns of gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 14, 62-71.
193.
Peterson, J.S., & Margolin, L. (1997). Naming gifted children: An example of unintended “reproduction .” Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 82-101.
194.
Peterson, J.S., & Rischar, H. (2000). Gifted and gay: A study of the adolescent experience . Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 231-246.
195.
Piechowski, M.M. (1992). Giftedness for all seasons: Inner peace in time of war. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. I. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development. Proceedings from the 1991 Henry B. & Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 180-203). Unionville, NY: Trillium Press.
196.
Piirto, J. (1998). Themes in the lives of successful contemporary U.S. women creative writers. Roeper Review, 21, 60-70.
197.
Pleiss, M.K., & Feldhusen, J.F. (1995). Mentors, role models and heroes in the lives of gifted children. Educational Psychologist , 30, 159-169.
198.
Pletan, M.D., Robinson, N.M., Berninger, V.W., & Abbot, R.D. (1995). Parents' observations of kindergartners who are advanced in mathematical reasoning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 30-44.
199.
Poelzer, G.H., & Feldhusen, J.F. (1997). The international baccalaureate: A program for gifted secondary students. Roeper Review, 19, 168-171.
200.
Pyryt, M.C., Sandals, L.H., & Begoray, J. (1998). Learning style preferences of gifted, average-ability, and special needs students: A multivariate perspective. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13, 71-76.
Ravaglia, R., Suppes, P., Stillinger, C., & Alper, T.M. (1995). Computer-based mathematics and physics for gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 7-13.
203.
Reid, C., Romanoff, B., Algozzine, B., & Udall, A. (2000). An evaluation of alternative screening procedures . Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 378-396.
204.
Reilly, J.M., & Welch, D.B. (1994/1995). Mentoring gifted young women. Journal for Secondary GiftedEducation, 6, 120-128.
205.
Reis, S., Neu, T., & McGuire, J. (1995). Talents in two places: Case studies of high ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved (Research Monograph 95114). Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
206.
Reis, S.M., Burns, D.E., & Renzulli, J.S. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
207.
Reis, S.M., & Renzulli, J.S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 119-130.
208.
Renzulli, J. (1994). Schools for talent development. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
209.
Renzulli, J., & Park, S. (2002). Giftedness and high school dropouts: Personal, family, and school related factors (RM02168). Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
210.
Renzulli, J.S. (2002). Emerging conceptions of giftedness: Building a bridge to the new century. Exceptionality, 10(2), 67-75.
211.
Renzulli, J.S., Leppien, J.H., & Hays, T.S. (2000). The multiple menu model: A practical guide for developing differentiated curriculum. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
212.
Renzulli, J.S., & Reis, S.M. (2003). The schoolwide enrichment model: Developing creative and productive giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 184-203). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
213.
Renzulli, J.S., & Reis, S.M. (2004). Curriculum compacting: A research-based differentiation strategy for culturally diverse talented students. In D. Boothe & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), In the eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity in gifted education (pp. 87-100). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
214.
Reyes, E.I., Fletcher, R., & Paez, D. (1996). Developing local multidimensional screening procedures for identifying giftedness among Mexican American border populations. Roeper Review, 18, 208-211.
215.
Ridges, J. (2000). Advocate role in developing district policy for gifted students. Roeper Review, 22, 199-201.
216.
Riley, T., & Karnes, F. (1998). Demonstrating creativity in the arts through competitions. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 10, 248-251.
217.
Riley, T.L. (1999). Put on your dancing shoes! Choreographing positive partnerships with parents of gifted children. GiftedChild Today, 22(4), 50-53.
218.
Roberts, S.M., & Lovett, S.B. (1994). Examining the “F” in gifted: Academically gifted adolescents' physiological and affective responses to scholastic failure. Journal for the Education of the Gifted , 17, 241-259.
219.
Robinson, A., & Clinkenbeard, P.R. (1998). Giftedness: An exceptionality examined. Annual Review ofPsychology, 49, 117-139.
220.
Robinson, S.M. (1999). Meeting the needs of students who are gifted and have learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic , 34, 195-204.
221.
Rogers, J.A. (1998). Refocusing the lens: Using observation to assess and identify gifted learners. Gifted Education International , 12, 129-144.
222.
Rogers, K. (2002). Re-forming gifted education: Matching the program to the child. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
223.
Rogers, K. (2004). Draft research support for the standards. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children .
224.
Rogers, K.B. (1991). The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learner: Research-based decision making series. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
225.
Ross, P.O. (1991). Advocacy for gifted programs in the new educational climate. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 173-176.
226.
Rotigel, J., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (1999). Using talent searches to identify and meet the educational needs of mathematically talented youngsters . School Science and Mathematics, 99, 330-337.
227.
Sak, U. ( 2004). A synthesis of research on psychological types of gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 15, 70-79.
228.
Sapon-Shevin, M. (2003). Equity, excellence, and school reform: Why is finding common ground so hard? In J. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 127-142). New York: Teachers College Press.
229.
Schlichter, C. L., & Palmer, W. R. (Eds.). (1993). Thinking smart: A premiere of the talents unlimited model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
230.
Schuler, P.A. (2000). Perfectionism and gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 11(4), 183-196.
231.
Shade, B. J. (Ed.). (1997). Culture, style, and the educative process: Making schools work for racially diverse students (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Siegle, D. (2002). Creating a living portfolio: Documenting student growth with electronic portfolios. GiftedChild Today, 25(3), 60-65.
234.
Siegle, D. (2004). Using media and technology with gifted learners . Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
235.
Siegle, D., & McCoach, D.B. (2005). Extending learning through mentorships. In F. Karnes & S. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching gifted (2nd ed., pp. 473-518). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
236.
Silverman, L.K. (1997). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3/4), 36-58.
237.
Silverman, L. K. (Ed.) (2000). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver, CO: Love.
238.
Simonton, D.K. (2000). Genius and giftedness: Same or different. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 111-121). New York: Elsevier.
239.
Solow, R.E. (1995). Parents' reasoning about the social and emotional development of their intellectually gifted children. Roeper Review, 18, 142-146.
240.
Southern, W.T., & Jones, E.D. (1991). The academic acceleration of gifted children. New York: Teachers College Press. Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement . New York: Macmillan.
241.
Steele, C.M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
242.
Stephens, K.R. (1999). Parents of the gifted and talented: The forgotten partner. GiftedChild Today, 22(5), 38-43, 52.
243.
Stephens, K.R., & Karnes, F.A. (2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited. Exceptional Children, 66, 219-238.
244.
Sternberg, R.J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence . New York: Cambridge University Press.
245.
Sternberg, R.J. (2000). Giftedness as developing expertise. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks , R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 55-66). New York: Elsevier.
246.
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (2006). Conceptions of giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
247.
Sternberg, R.J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E.L. (1998). Teaching triarchically improves school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology , 90, 374-384.
248.
Stormont, M., Stebbins, M.S., & Holliday, G. (2001). Characteristics and educational support needs of underrepresented gifted adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 413-423.
249.
Strip, C., & Hirsch, G. (2001). Trust and teamwork: The parent-teacher partnership for helping the gifted child. GiftedChild Today, 24(2), 26-30, 64.
250.
Subotnik, R.F., & Steiner, C.L. (1993). Adult manifestations of adolescent talent in science . Roeper Review, 15, 164-169.
251.
Terman, L.M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
252.
Terry, A.W. (2003). Effects of service learning on young, gifted adolescents and their community. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 295-308.
253.
Thompson, M.C., & Thompson, M.B. (1996). Reflection on foreign language study for highly able learners. In J. VanTassel-Baska , D. T. Johnson, & L. N. Boyce (Eds.), Developing verbal talent: Ideas and strategies for teachers of elementary and middle school students (pp. 174-188). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
254.
Tomlinson, C.A. (2002). Different learners, different lessons. Instructor, 112(2), 21, 24-26.
255.
Tomlinson, C.A., Callahan, C.M., & Lelli, K.M. (1997). Challenging expectations: Case studies of high-potential, culturally diverse young children. Gifted Child Quarterly , 41, 5-17.
256.
Tomlinson, C.A., & Cunningham-Eidson, C. (2003). Differentiation in practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum, grades K-5. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
257.
Tomlinson, C.A., Kaplan, S.N., Renzulli, J., Burns, D.E., Leppien, J.H., & Purcell, J.H. (2001). The parallel curriculum: A model for planning curriculum for gifted students and whole classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Torrance, E.P. (1984). Mentor relationships: How they aid creative achievement, endure, change and die. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
260.
Treffinger, D. (1994). Productive thinking: Toward authentic instruction and assessment. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 6, 30-37.
261.
Tyler-Wood, T., & Carri, L. (1993). Verbal measures of cognitive ability: The gifted low SES student's albatross. Roeper Review, 16, 102-105.
262.
Uresti, R., Goertz, J., & Bernal, E.M. (2002). Maximizing achievement for potentially gifted and talented and regular minority students in a primary classroom. Roeper Review, 25, 27-31.
263.
U.S. Department of Education. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
264.
U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Initiative to ensure a talented, dedicated, and well-prepared teacher in every classroom. Washington, DC: Author .
265.
Valdes, G. (2002). Understanding the special giftedness of young interpreters (Research monograph series No. RM02158). Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
266.
van Stekelenburg, A.V. (1984). Classics for the gifted: Evaluation. South Africa . Retrieved March 18, 2005, from ERIC database.
267.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1982). Results of a Latin-based experimental study of the verbally precocious. Roeper Review, 4, 35-37.
268.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1992). Planning effective curriculum for gifted learners . Denver, CO: Love.
269.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1998). The development of academic talent. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 760-763.
270.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2002). Assessment of gifted student learning in the language arts. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13, 67-72.
271.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2003a). Content-based curriculum for low income and minority gifted learners (RM03180). Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut .
272.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2003b). Differentiating the language arts for high ability learners, K-8. Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. Retrieved March 25, 2005, from ERIC database.
273.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2004a, May). The development of an NCATE conceptual framework, research base, and standards for gifted education. Presentation at the NAGC University Network Meeting, Crystal City, VA.
274.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2004b). Metaevaluation findings: A call for gifted program quality. In J. VanTassel-Baska & A. X. Feng (Eds.), Designing and utilizing evaluation for gifted program improvement (pp. 227-245). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
275.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Avery, L.D., Little, C., & Hughes, C. (2000). An evaluation of the implementation of curriculum innovation: The impact of the William and Mary units on schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 244-272.
276.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D., & Avery, L.D. (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 110-123.
277.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D.T., Hughes, C.E., & Boyce, L.N. (1996). A study of language arts curriculum effectiveness with gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted , 19, 461-480.
278.
VanTassel-Baska, J., & Little, C. A. (Eds.). (2003). Content based curriculum for gifted learners . Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
279.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Kulieke, M. (1994). A study of self-concept and social support in advantaged and disadvantaged seventh and eighth grade gifted students. Roeper Review, 16, 186-191.
280.
VanTassel-Baska, J. & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
281.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Zuo, L., Avery, L.D., & Little, C.A. (2002). Curriculum study of gifted-student learning in the language arts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 30-44.
282.
Vespi, L., & Yewchuk, C. (1992). A phenomenological study of the social/emotional characteristics of gifted learning disabled children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 55-72.
283.
Vinovskis, M. (1996). An analysis of the concept and uses of systemic educational reform. American Educational Research Journal , 33, 53-89.
284.
Wang, M., Haertel, G., & Walberg, H. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249-294.
285.
Winebrenner, S. (2003). Teaching gifted kids in the regular classroom (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
286.
Winner, E., & Martino, G. (2000). Giftedness in non-academic domains: The case of the visual arts and music. In K. A. Heller , F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 95-110). New York: Pergamon.
287.
Winner, E., & Martino, G. (2003). Artistic giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 335-349). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
288.
Yinger, R. (1999). The role of standards in teaching and teacher education. In G. Griffin (Ed.), The education of teachers: The 98th yearbook of theNSSE (pp. 85-113). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
289.
Zamora-Duran, G., & Reyes, E.I. (1997). From tests to talking in the classroom: Assessing communicative competence. In A. J. Artiles & G. Zamora-Duran (Eds.), Reducing disproportionate representation of culturally diverse students in special and gifted education (pp. 47-58). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
