Adler, M. J. (1984). The Paideia Program: An educational syllabus. New York: Macmillan.
2.
Bracken, B., VanTassel-Baska, J., Feng, A., & Brown, E. (2006). Project Athena: A tale of two studies. In J. VanTassel-Baska & T. Stambaugh (Eds.),Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners (pp. 63-37). Washington, DC: National Association of Gifted Children.
3.
Brown, E., Avery, L., VanTassel-Baska, J., Worley, B., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). A five-state analysis of gifted education policies. Ohio policy study results. Roeper Review, 29(1), 11-23.
4.
Callahan, C. M. (2005). Identifying gifted students from under-represented populations. Theory into Practice, 44, 98-105.
5.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
6.
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students. Iowa City, IA: Belin-Blank Center.
7.
Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: An Agenda for American Science and Technology, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: Author.
8.
Eisner, E. (2000). The kind of schools we need: Personal essays. Linguistics and Education, 11, 165-167.
9.
Ford, D. Y. (1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students: Promising programs and practices. New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
Frasier, M. M. (1991). Disadvantaged and culturally diverse gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 234-245.
11.
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the 21st century. New York: Farrar, Strauss, & Giroux.
12.
Gallagher, J. (2004). Public policy in gifted education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
13.
Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 115-123.
14.
Johnsen, S. K., Feuerbacher, S., & Witte, M. M. (2006). Increasing the retention of gifted students from low-income backgrounds in university programs for the gifted: The UYP project. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Serving gifted learners beyond the traditional classroom (pp. 55-79). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
15.
Johnsen, S. K., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Robinson, A. (2006). Draft guidebook for higher education institutions implementing the new NCATE standards. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
16.
Killeavy, M. (2006). Induction: A collective endeavor of learning, teaching, and leading. Theory Into Practice, 45, 168-176.
17.
Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73-77.
18.
Little, C., Rogers, K., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Avery, L. (in press). Project Phoenix: Curriculum effectiveness in regular classrooms. Gifted Child Quarterly.
19.
National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
20.
Novak, J. D. (2005). Results and implications of a 12-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 35, 23-40.
21.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2006). Addressing the achievement gap between minority and non-minority children: Increasing access and achievement through Project Excite. Gifted Child Today, 29(2), 28-37.
22.
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 119-130.
23.
Reynolds, F. C., & Piirto, J. (2005). Depth psychology and giftedness: Bringing soul to the field of talent development and giftedness. Roeper Review, 27, 164-164.
24.
Robinson, A., Shore, B. M., & Enersen, D. (2006). Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
25.
Rogers, K. B. (1998). Using current research to make “good” decisions about grouping. NASSP Bulletin, 82(595), 38-46.
26.
Rogers, K. B. (2002). Re-forming gifted education: How parents and teachers can match the program to the child. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
27.
Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 247-256.
28.
Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement(Research progress report). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
29.
Siegle, D. (2005). Developing mentorship programs for gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
30.
Stronge, J. H. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
31.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2005). Gifted programs and services: What are the non-negotiables?Theory Into Practice, 44, 90-97.
32.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (Ed.). (2006). Serving gifted learners beyond the traditional classroom. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
33.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Bass, G., Ries, R., Poland, D., & Avery, L. (1998). A national pilot study of science curriculum effectiveness for high ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 200-211.
34.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnsen, S., Kitano, M., Rogers, K., Montgomery, D., & Olenchak, R. (2006). Gifted NCATE standards and underlying evidence (NAGC-CEC task force report). Washington, DC: National Association of Gifted Children.
35.
VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (Eds.). (2006). Over looked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners. Washington, DC: National Association of Gifted Children.
36.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Zuo, L., Avery, L., & Little, C. (2002). A curriculum study of gifted-student learning in the language arts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 30-43.
37.
Wenglinsky, H. (2004, November 23). Closing the racial achievement gap: The role of reforming instructional practices. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(64). Retrieved October 31, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n64/