If the academic needs of the most profoundly gifted students can be met through the use of existing educational practices, specialists in gifted education can assume that the educational needs of less able, but still academically talented, students can also be met by using some combination of these strategies as well. This paper illustrates the feasibility and effectiveness of utilizing an individualized educational approach with gifted students by highlighting the unique educational paths taken by two of the very ablest math prodigies identified by Dr. Julian Stanley through the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) since its founding in 1971. Interviews with Dr. Terence (“Terry”) Tao and Dr. Lenhard (“Lenny”) Ng, now both highly successful mathematicians, are presented in their entirety, demonstrating that even among the very ablest, strategies can be tailored effectively to the characteristics of each student through a combination of creative planning and the cooperation of parents, educators, and mentors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnold, K. D., & Subotnik, R. F. (1995). Mentoring the gifted: A differentiated model. Educational Horizons, 73, 118-123.
2.
Benbow, C. P. (1979). The components of SMPY's smorgasbord of accelerative options. Intellectually Talented Youth Bulletin, 5(10), 21-23.
3.
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1996). Inequity in equity: How “equity” can lead to inequity for high potential students. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 2, 249-292.
4.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.
5.
Brody, L. E. (Ed.). (2004). Grouping and acceleration practices in gifted education. In S. M. Reis (Series Ed.), Essential readings in gifted education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press and the National Association for Gifted Children.
6.
Brody, L. E., & Benbow, C. P. (1987). Accelerative strategies: How effective are they for the gifted?Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 105-110.
7.
Brody, L. E., Lupkowski, A. E., & Stanley, J. C. (1988). Early entrance to college: A study of academic and social adjustment during the freshman year. College and University, 63, 347-359.
8.
Brody, L. E., & Stanley, J. C. (1991). Young college students: Assessing factors that contribute to success. In W. T. Southern & E. D. Jones (Eds.), The academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 102-132). New York: Teachers College Press.
9.
Broili, S. (1994, December 27). Ng's award shows need: Brightest often lose out on aid. Chapel Hill Herald, p. 1-1.
10.
Casey, K. M., & Shore, B. M. (2000). Mentors' contributions to gifted adolescents' affective, social, and vocational development. Roeper Review, 22, 227-230.
11.
Clasen, D. R., & Clasen, R. E. (2003). Mentoring the gifted and talented. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 254-267). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (Vols. 1 and 2). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
13.
Daurio, S. P. (1979). Educational enrichment versus acceleration: A review of the literature. In W. C. George, S. J. Cohn, & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Educating the gifted: Acceleration and enrichment (pp. 13-63). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
Fischer, J. (1990, April 1). 13-year-old math whiz Lenny Ng of Chapel Hill may be the smartest kid in America. Charlotte Observer, pp. 1E-2E.
15.
Gagné, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Re-examining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(3), 103-112.
16.
Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 60-74). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
George, W. C., Cohn, S. J., & Stanley, J. C. (1979). Educating the gifted: Acceleration and enrichment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
Gross, M. U. M. (1986). Radical acceleration in Australia: Terence Tao. Gifted Child Today, 9(4), 2-11.
19.
Gross, M. U. M. (2003). International perspectives. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 547-557). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20.
Gross, M. U. M. (2004). Exceptionally gifted children (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
21.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above I.Q. 180 Stanford-Binet. New York: World Books.
22.
Passow, A. H. (1997). International perspectives on gifted education. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 528-535). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (2003). New directions in enrichment and acceleration. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 163-173). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24.
Stanley, J. C. (1991). A better model for residential high schools for talented youths. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 471-473.
25.
Stanley, J. C., George, W. C., & Solano, C. H. (1977). Educational programs and intellectual prodigies. Baltimore: Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth, Johns Hopkins University.
26.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
27.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 45-59). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
Tao, B. (2003, August). From sprinter to marathon runner: Insights from a math prodigy. Presented in a symposium at the 15th World Conference, Adelaide, South Australia.
29.
Wallace, A. (1986). The prodigy: A biography of William James Sidis, America's greatest child prodigy. New York: E. P. Dutton.
30.
Weiner, N. (1953). Ex-prodigy: My childhood and youth. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
31.
Weiner, N. (1956). I am a mathematician: The later life of a prodigy. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
