This study emerges from the lack of empirical research on gifted students' attributions about academic success and failure in multiple subject areas and school in general. We explored differences in top attributional choices between boys and girls for success and failure in general academics, language arts, science, and mathematics. Gifted students were more likely to attribute failure to not working hard enough (long-term effort), rather than to not being smart (ability). Sex differences were found in attributional choices for general academics, science, mathematics, and language arts. The findings counter some popular theoretical expectations of gifted students' attributional choices for success and failure in their academic performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Boekaerts, M., Otten, R., & Voeten, R. (2003). Examination performance: Are students' causal attributions school-subject specific?Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 16, 331-342.
2.
Bogie, C. E., & Buckhalt, J. A. (1987). Reactions to failure and success among gifted, average, and EMR students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 70-74.
3.
Chan, L. K. S. (1996). Motivational orientations and meta-cognitive abilities of intellectually gifted students. Roeper Review, 40, 184-193.
4.
Cramer, J., & Oshima, T. C. (1992). Do gifted females attribute their math performance differently than other students?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 18-35.
5.
Dai, D. Y., Moon, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 45-63.
6.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
7.
Eisenberger, R. (1992). Learned industriousness. Psychological Review, 99, 248-267.
8.
Gilbert, M. C. (1996). Attributional patterns and perceptions of math and science among fifth-grade through seventh-grade girls and boys. Sex Roles, 35, 489-506.
9.
Heller, K. A., & Ziegler, A. (1996). Gender differences in mathematics and the sciences: Can attributional retraining improve the performance of gifted females?Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 200-210.
10.
Heller, K. A., & Ziegler, A. (2001). Attributional retraining: A classroom-integrated model for nurturing talents in mathematics and the sciences. In N. Colangelo & S. Assouline (Eds.), Talent development IV (pp. 205-217). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
11.
Laffoon, K. S., Jenkins-Friedman, R., & Tollefson, N. (1989). Causal attributions of underachieving gifted, achieving gifted, and nongifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 4-21.
12.
Li, A. K. F., & Adamson, G. (1995). Motivational patterns related to gifted students' learning of mathematics, science and English: An examination of gender differences. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 284-297.
13.
McNabb, T. (1997). From potential to performance: Motivational issues for gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 408-415). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
McNabb, T. (2003). Motivational issues: Potential to performance. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 417-423). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
Neihart, M., Reis, S. M., Robinson, N. M., & Moon, S. M. (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
16.
Newman, R. S., & Stevenson, H. W. (1990). Children's achievement and causal attributions in mathematics and reading. Journal of Experimental Education, 58, 197-212.
17.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Reis, S. M. (1998). Work left undone: Choices and compromises of talented females. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
19.
Ryckman, D. B., & Peckham, P. (1987). Gender differences in attributions for success and failure situations across subject areas. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 120-125.
20.
Stipek, D. J. (1984). Sex differences in children's attributions for success and failure on math and spelling tests. Sex Roles, 11, 969-981.
21.
Stipek, D. J., & Gralinski, J. H. (1991). Gender differences in children's achievement-related beliefs and emotional responses to success and failure in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 361-371.
22.
Weiner, B. (Ed.). (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
23.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
24.
Wigfield, A. (1988). Children's attributions for success and failure: Effects of age and attentional focus. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 76-81.
