Two exemplary teachers of gifted learners were studied in order to get a better understanding of both teacher practices and teacher thoughts about those practices. Through extensive observation and in-depth interviews, these teachers demonstrated and discussed the qualities they felt to be essential for educating gifted learners. Though each teacher leads a different kind of classroom experience, both assert that (a) teaching gifted learners requires the framing of individualized and whole-group learning simultaneously, and (b) that the path a person takes to become a teacher of gifted learners is important. Equally significant is the way each of these teachers assimilates and combines some of the canonical ideas of gifted education. This kind of study is rare in our literature, but may be invaluable for teachers—pre-service teachers or those already working—who want to hone their skills in working with gifted learners.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Angrosino, M., & de Perez, K. (2000). Rethinking observation: From method to context. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 673-702). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
2.
Archambault, F. X., Westberg, K., Brown, S., Hallmark, B., Emmons, C., & Zhang, W. (1993). Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Results of a national survey of classroom teachers (National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, research monograph 93101). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.
3.
Cassady, J., & Mullen, L. (Eds.). (2001). A legacy of promise: Reflections, suggestions, and directions from contemporary leaders in the field of gifted education. The Teacher Educator, 36, 167-184.
4.
Chan, D. (2001). Characteristics and competencies of teachers of gifted learners: The Hong Kong perspective. Roeper Review, 23, 197-201.
5.
Coleman, L. (1994). “Being a teacher”: Emotions and optimal experience while teaching gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 146-152.
6.
Cresswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7.
Croft, L. J. (2003). Teachers of the gifted: Gifted teachers. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 558-571). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
8.
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
Gallagher, J. (1964). Teaching the gifted child. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
10.
Greene, M. (1987). Teaching as project: Choice, perspective, and the public space. In F. S. Bolin & J. M. Falk (Eds.), Teacher renewal: Professional issues, personal choices (pp. 178-189). New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
Hansen J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 115-121.
12.
Janesick, V. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design: Minuets, improvisations, and crystallization. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 379-400). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
13.
Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
LeCompte, M., & Schensul, J. (1999). Designing & conducting ethnographic research. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
15.
McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
Merriam, S. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
17.
Mills, C. (2003). Characteristics of effective teachers of gifted students: Teacher background and personality styles of students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 272-281.
18.
Miranda, E., & Landmann, R. (2001). Gifted teachers creating gifted classrooms: One exceptional teacher, one exceptional classroom. Roeper Review, 23, 230-234.
19.
Moon, S. M. (1991). Case study research in gifted education. In N. K. Buchanan & J. F. Feldhusen (Eds.), Conducting research and evaluation in gifted education: A handbook of methods and applications (pp. 157-178). New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
National Association for Gifted Children. (2003). Publications list. Washington, DC: Author.
21.
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22.
Piirto, J. (1999). Talented children and adults: Their development and education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
23.
Pollock, J. (1996). Change and growth in a beginning teacher of the gifted: A case study. Education, 117, 154-159.
24.
Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
25.
Sisk, D. (1989). Creative teaching of the gifted. New York: McGraw Hill.
26.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
27.
Stone-Wiske, M. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching for understanding: Linking research with practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishing.
28.
Tedlock, B. (2000). Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 455-486). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29.
Tomlinson, C. A., Tomchin, E. M., Callahan, C. M., Adams, C. M., Pizzat-Tinnin, P., Cunningham, C. M., et al. (1994). Practices of preservice teachers related to gifted and other academically diverse learners. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 106-114.
30.
VanTassel-Baska, J., & Little, C. (2003). Curriculum planning & instructional design: For gifted learners. Denver, CO: Love Publishing Co.
31.
Wolcott, H. (1999). Ethnography: A way of seeing. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
