Brainstorming may be the best-known tool for group idea generation and is widely taught in gifted and talented programs. Many empirical studies have been conducted regarding the effectiveness of brainstorming, and they have provided useful insights into the salient barriers facing groups who use this tool. Although a great deal of this literature focuses on the limitations of brainstorming, the exploratory study included in this article sheds light on approaches that can enhance the value of this tool by examining the impact of the facilitator’s role within group idea generation. Finally, this article outlines recommendations for teaching, learning, and applying brainstorming.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Basadur, M., & Thompson, R. (1986). Usefulness of the ideation principle of extended effort in real world professional and managerial creative problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 23-34.
2.
Benbasat, I., & Lim, L. H. (1993). The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Research, 24, 430-462.
3.
Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1972). Training, motivation, and personality as determinants of the effectiveness of brainstorming groups and individuals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 324-331.
4.
Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Barsaloux, J., & Drauden, G. (1974). Brainstorming procedure, group size, and sex as determinants of the problem-solving effectiveness of groups and individuals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 135-138.
5.
Bouchard, T. J., Jr., & Hare, M. (1970). Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 51-55.
6.
Brown, V. R., & Paulus, P. B. (2002). Making group brainstorming more effective: Recommendations from an associative memory perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 11, 208-212.
7.
Bui, T., & Sivasankaran, T. R. (1990). Relation between GDSS use and group task complexity. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, 3, 69-78.
8.
Camacho, L. M., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071-1080.
9.
Clawson, V. K., Bostrom, R. P., & Anson, R. (1993). The role of the facilitator in computer-supported meetings. Small Group Research, 24, 547-565.
10.
Cohen, D., Whitmyre, J. W., & Funk, W. H. (1960). Effect of group cohesiveness and training upon creative thinking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 319-322.
11.
Connolly, T., Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 689-703.
12.
Cooper, W. H., Gallupe, R. B., Pollard, S., & Cadsby, J. (1998). Some liberating effects of anonymous electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29, 147-178.
13.
Costa, A. L. (Ed.). (2001). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
14.
Daly, B. (1993). The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction. Accounting, Management & Information Technology, 3, 1-22.
15.
Davis, J. H. (1969). Group performance. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Connolly, T., & Wynne, B. E. (1996). Process structuring in electronic brainstorming. Information Systems Research, 7, 268-277.
17.
Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., & Nunamaker, J. H., Jr. (1990). An experimental investigation of the effects of group size in an electronic meeting environment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 25, 1049-1057.
18.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
19.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.
20.
Dugosh, L. K., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H. C. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personal Social Psychology, 79, 722-732.
21.
Dunnette, M. D., Campbell, J., & Jaastad, K. (1963). The effect of group participation on brainstorming effectiveness for two industrial samples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 30-37.
22.
Eveland, J. D., & Bikson, T. K. (1989). Work group structures and computer support: A field experiment. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6, 354-379.
23.
Feldhusen, J. F., & Treffinger, D. J. (1985). Creative thinking and problem solving in gifted education. Dubuque, IA; Kendall/Hunt.
24.
Finholt, T., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1990). Communication and performance in ad hoc groups. In J. Galegher, R. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 291-325). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Firestien, R. L., & McCowan, R. (1988). Creative problem solving and communication behavior in small groups. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 106-114.
26.
Fleming, G. P. (2000). The effects of brainstorming on subsequent problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of St. Louis University, Ann Arbor, MI.
27.
Ford, C. M. (1999). Thinking big about small groups in the real world: Comment on Craig and Kelly. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3, 257-262.
28.
Forsyth, D. F. (2000). One hundred years of group research: Introduction to the special issue. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 3-6.
29.
Gallupe, R. B., Bastianutti, L. M., & Cooper, W. H. (1991). Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 137-142.
30.
Gerlach, V. S., Schutz, R. E., Baker, R. L., & Mazer, G. E. (1964). Effects of variations in test directions on originality test response. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 79-83.
31.
Geschka, H., Schaude, G. R., & Schlicksupp, H. (1975). Modern techniques for solving problems. In M. M. Baldwin (Ed.), Portraits of complexity: Applications of systems methodologies to societal problems (pp. 1-7). Columbus, OH: Battelle Memorial Institute.
32.
Gowan, J. C., Khatena, J., & Torrance, E. P. (Eds.). (1979). Educating the ablest: A book of readings. New York: F. E. Peacock Publishers.
33.
Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1980). A study of creative problem solving techniques in group settings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London, London.
34.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational psychology (pp. 315-342). New York: Prentice Hall.
35.
Hare, A. P. (Ed.). (1976). Handbook of small group research (2nd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
36.
Harkins, S. G., Latané, B., & Williams, K. (1980). Social loafing: Allocating effort or taking it easy?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 457-465.
37.
Henningsen, D. D., Cruz, M. G., & Miller, M. L. (2000). Role of social loafing in predeliberation decision making. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 168-175.
38.
Hollingshead, A. B., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical literature. In R. A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 46-78). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
Isaksen, S. G. (1983). Toward a model for the facilitation of creative problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 17, 18-30.
40.
Isaksen, S. G., & Dorval, K. B. (2000). Facilitating creative problem solving. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Facilitative leadership: Making a difference with creative problem solving (pp. 187-249). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
41.
Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (1998). Toolbox for creative problem solving: Basic tools and resources. Buffalo, NY: Creative Problem Solving Group—Buffalo.
42.
Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2000). Creative approaches to problem solving: A framework for change. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
43.
Jablin, F. M., & Seibold, D. R. (1978). Implications for problem solving groups of empirical research on “brainstorming”: A critical review of the literature. Southern Speech Communications Journal, 43, 327-356.
44.
Jackson, J. M., & Williams, K. D. (1985). Social loafing on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 937-942.
45.
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
46.
Katzenbach, J. R. (1998). Teams at the top: Unleashing the potential of both teams and individual leader. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
47.
Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78-94.
48.
Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group Performance and Decision Making. Annual Reviews Psychology, 55, 623-655.
49.
Kramer, T. J., Fleming, G. P., & Mannis, S. M. (2001). Improving face-to-face brainstorming through modeling and facilitation. Small Group Research, 32, 533-557.
50.
Lamm, J., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361-388.
51.
Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
52.
Maginn, B. K., & Harris, R. J. (1980). Effects of anticipated evaluation on individual brainstorming performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 219-225.
53.
McCall, M. W., & Bobko, P. (1990). Research methods in the service of discovery. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 381-418). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
54.
McGrane, P. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1992). Discussion: Fatal vision—The failure of the schools in teaching children to think. In C. Collins & J. N. Mangieri (Eds.), Teaching thinking: An agenda for the 21st century (pp. 333-344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55.
Meadow, A., & Parnes, S. J. (1959). Evaluation of training in creative problem solving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 189-194.
56.
Meadow, A., Parnes, S. J., & Reese, H. (1959). Influences of brainstorming instructions and problem sequence on a creative problem solving test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 413-416.
57.
Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Psychology, 12, 3-23.
58.
Mulvey, P. W., Bowes-Sperry, L., & Klein, H. J. (1998). The effects of perceived loafing and defensive management on group effectiveness. Small Group Research, 29, 394-415.
59.
Mulvey, P. W., & Klein, H. J. (1998). The impact of perceived loafing and collective efficacy on group goal processes and group performance. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 74, 62-87.
60.
Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392-430). New York: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Nunamaker, J. F., Applegate, L. M., & Konsynski, B. R. (1987). Facilitating group creativity: Experience with a group decision support system. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3, 5-19.
62.
Nunamaker, J. F., Briggs, R. O., Mittleman, D. D., Vogel, D. R., & Balthazard, P. A. (1997). Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: A discussion of lab and field findings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 163-207.
63.
Offner, A. K., Kramer, T. J., & Winter, J. P. (1996). The effects of facilitation, recording, and pauses on group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 27, 283-298.
64.
Orbell, J., & Dawes, R. (1981). Social dilemmas. In G. Stephenson & H. H. Davis (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 37-65). New York: Wiley.
65.
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
66.
Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving (3rd Rev. ed.). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
67.
Oxley, N. L., Dzindolet, M. T., & Paulus, P. B. (1996). The effects of facilitators on the performance of brainstorming groups. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 633-646.
68.
Parloff, M. B., & Handlon, J. H. (1964). The influence of criticalness on creative problem solving in dyads. Psychiatry, 52, 117-122.
69.
Parnes, S. J. (1961). Effects of extended effort in creative problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 117-122.
70.
Parnes, S. J., Noller, R. B., & Biondi, A. M. (1977). Guide to creative action. New York: Scribners.
71.
Paulus, P. B. (1983). Group influences on individual task performance. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 97-120). New York: Springer-Verlag.
72.
Paulus, P. B., Brown, V., & Ortega, A. H. (1999). Group creativity. In R. E. Purser & A. Montuori (Eds.), Social creativity in organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 151-176). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
73.
Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575-586.
74.
Pfeiffer, S. I. (2003). Challenges and opportunities for students who are gifted: What the experts say. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 161-169.
75.
Price, K. H. (1985). Problem-solving strategies: A comparison by problem-solving phases. Group & Organization Studies, 10, 278-299.
76.
Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41, 248-265.
77.
Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1996). Bona fide groups. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 147-178). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
78.
Rickards, T. (1999). Brainstorming. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 219-227). New York: Academic Press.
79.
Ruback, R. B., Dabbs, J. M., & Hopper, C. H. (1984). The process of brainstorming: An analysis with individual and group vocal parameters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 558-567.
80.
Sager, S., & Baron, C. (1994). Statview for the Macintosh (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: Abacus Concepts.
81.
Seta, J. J., Seta, C. E., & Donaldson, S. (1991). The impact of comparison processes on coactors’ frustration and willingness to expend effort. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 560-568.
82.
Shepperd, J. A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 67-81.
83.
Smith, B. L. (1993). Interpersonal behaviors that damage the productivity of creative problem-solving groups. Journal of Creative Behavior, 27, 171-187.
84.
Sundstrom, E., McIntyre, M., Halfhill, T., & Richards, H. (2000). Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 44-67.
85.
Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685-718.
86.
Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C. H. (1958). Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking?Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 22-47.
87.
Thompson, L. F., & Coovert, M. D. (2002). Stepping up to the challenge: A critical examination of face-to-face and computer-mediated team decision making. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 55-64.
88.
Vroom, V. H., Grant, L. D., & Cotton, T. S. (1969). The consequences of social interaction in group problem solving. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 77-95.
89.
Watson, W., Michaelsen, L. K., & Sharp, W. (1991). Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 803-809.
90.
Weisband, S. P. (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 352-380.
91.
Weisskopf-Joelson, E., & Eliseo, T. S. (1961). An experimental study of the effectiveness of brainstorming. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45, 45-49.
92.
Wheeler, J. W. (1995). An exploratory study of preferences associated with creative problem solving. Unpublished master’s project, Center for Studies in Creativity, State University of New York, College at Buffalo.
93.
Zagona, S. V., Willis, J. E., & MacKinnon, W. J. (1966). Group effectiveness in creative problem-solving tasks: An examination of relevant variables. The Journal of Psychology, 62, 111-137.
94.
Zalesny, M. D., & Ford, J. K. (1990). Extending the social information processing perspective: New links to attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 205-246.
95.
Zigurs, I., & Dickson, G. (1990). Computer support for decision-making teams: The issue of outcome quality. Faculty Working Paper Series, College of Business and Administration, University of Colorado, Boulder.
