Radical acceleration is a successful, yet rarely utilized educational practice that assists educators in meeting the cognitive and affective needs of highly gifted students. Individual case studies and cohort studies of students who have radically accelerated are reviewed regarding combinations of procedures that result in successful acceleration, variables that appear to predict success and cognitive and affective outcomes. While research supports the use of radical acceleration for the positive cognitive and affective gains that result for highly gifted students, some concerns about the process have been identified. An outline is presented of procedures that have been shown to lessen the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes. These procedures include counseling support, study skills programs, and opportunities to foster social interaction with other students. The literature concerning radical acceleration strongly supports the wider adoption of this most successful intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. S. (1983). Opening doors for the gifted. American Education, 19(3), 40-43.
2.
Brody, L. E. (2001). The Talent Search Model for meeting the academic needs of gifted and talented students. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 99-102.
3.
Brody, L. E., & Stanley, J. C. (1991). Young college students: Assessing factors that contribute to success. In W. T. Southern & E. D. Jones (Eds.), The academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 102-132). New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
Burg, B. (1992). Gifted education in Israel. Roeper Review, 14, 217-221.
5.
Chan, D. W. (1998). News around the world: Development of gifted education in Hong Kong. Gifted Education International, 13, 150-158.
6.
Charlton, J. C., Marolf, D. M., & Stanley, J. C. (1994). Follow-up insights on rapid educational acceleration. Roeper Review, 17, 123-130.
7.
Clements, M. A. (1984). Terry Tao. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 213-238.
8.
Comunian, A. L. (2000). Cultural values and education for the gifted and talented in Italy. Roeper Review, 22, 117-120.
9.
Cooper, E. (1999). A reflection: The Japanese approach to gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Today, 22(2), 18-21.
10.
Cornell, D. G., Callahan, C. M., & Loyd, B. H. (1991a). Personality growth of female early college entrants: A controlled prospective study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 135-143.
11.
Cornell, D. G., Callahan, C. M., & Loyd, B. H. (1991b). Socioemotional adjustment of adolescent girls enrolled in a residential acceleration program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 58-66.
12.
Cox, C. M. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses: Genetic studies of genius, Vol. 2. Stanford CA; Stanford University Press.
13.
Daurio, S. P. (1979). Educational enrichment versus acceleration: A review of the literature. In W. C. George, S. J. Cohn, & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Educating the gifted: Acceleration and enrichment (pp. 13-63). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
Donoghue, E. (1999). Israel arts and science academy. Gifted Child Today, 22(2), 40-43.
15.
Gallagher, J. J. (1984). Excellence and equity—A world-wide conflict. Gifted International, 2(2), 1-8.
16.
Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An enquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.
17.
Gilheany, S. (2001). The Irish Centre for Talented Youth—An adaptation of the Johns Hopkins Talent Search Model. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 102-104.
18.
Gregory, E. H., & Stevens-Long, J. (1986). Coping skills among highly gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 9(2), 147-155.
19.
Gross, M. U. M. (1986, July/August). Radical acceleration in Australia: Terence Tao. G/C/T, 9(4), 2-11.
20.
Gross, M. U. M. (1992). The use of radical acceleration in cases of extreme intellectual precocity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 90-98.
21.
Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Exceptionally gifted children, London: Routledge.
22.
Gross, M. U. M. (2003). Exceptionally gifted children (2nd ed.). London: Routledge/Falmer.
23.
Hendricks, M. (1997). Yesterday's whiz kids: Where are they today?Johns Hopkins Magazine, 49(3), 30-36.
24.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above IQ 180: Their origin and development. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book.
25.
Holmes, J. S., Rin, L. H., Tremblay, J. M., & Zeldin, R. K. (1984, May/June). Colin Camerer: The early years of a radical accelerant. G/C/T, 33-35.
26.
Janos, P. M., & Robinson, N. M. (1985). The performance of students in a program of radical acceleration at the university level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 175-179.
27.
Janos, P. M., Robinson, N. M., Carter, C., Chapel, A., Cufley, R., Curland, M., et al. (1988). A cross-sectional developmental study of the social relations of students who enter college early. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 210-215.
28.
Janos, P. M., Robinson, N. M., & Lunneborg, C. E. (1989). Markedly early entrance to college: A multi-year comparative study of academic performance and psychological adjustment. Journal of Higher Education, 60, 496-518.
29.
Janos, P. M., Sanfilippo, S. M., & Robinson, N. M. (1986). “Underachievement” among markedly accelerated college students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15, 303-311.
30.
Kelly, M. P. (1985). Unique educational acceleration: The dilemma of John Stuart Mill and contemporary gifted youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 68-73.
31.
Khaladjan, N. N. (1993). New authorized education technology revolutionizes teaching methods meeting the challenge of worldwide education. Education, 114(1), 92-96.
32.
Liu, J., & Barnhart, R. (1996). Chinese gifted teenage university program. Journal of Special Education, 30, 204-212.
33.
Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 718-729.
34.
Marsh, H. B., & Craven, R. (1997). The Big Fish Little Pond Effect, optical illusions and misinterpretations: A Response to Gross (1997). Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 7(1), 6-15.
35.
Montour, K. (1977). William James Sidis: The broken twig. American Psychologist, 32, 265-279.
36.
Noble, K. D., Arndt, T., Nicholson, T., Sletten, T., & Zamora, A. (1999). Different strokes: Perceptions of social and emotional development among early college entrants. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 77-84.
37.
Noble, K. D., & Drummond, J. E. (1992). But what about the prom? Students' perceptions of early college entrance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 106-111.
38.
Noble, K. D., & Smyth, R. K. (1995). Keeping their talents alive: Young women's assessment of radical, post-secondary acceleration. Roeper Review, 18, 49-55.
39.
Nowicka, R. (1995). Supporting gifted and talented children within the Polish educational system. Gifted and Talented International, 19, 36-38.
40.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1995). A summary of research regarding early entry to college. Roeper Review, 18, 121-125.
41.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (n.d.). Thinking about early entrance to college. Retrieved February 7, 2005, from http://www.ctd.northwestern.edu/resources/earlyen-trance/thinkingearly.html
42.
Pollins, L. D. (1983). The effects of acceleration on the social and emotional development of gifted students. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 160-178). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
43.
Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
44.
Robinson, H. B. (1983). A case for radical acceleration: Programs of the Johns Hopkins University and the University of Washington. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 139-159). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
45.
Robinson, N. M. (1992). Radical acceleration in the People's Republic of China: Early entrance to university. Roeper Review, 14, 189-192.
46.
Robinson, N. M., & Harsin, C. (2002). Considering the options: A guidebook for investigating early college entrance. Reno, NV: Davidson Institute for Talent Development.
47.
Robinson, N. M., & Janos, P. M. (1986). Psychological adjustment in a college-level program of marked academic acceleration. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15(1), 51-60.
48.
Robinson, N. M., & Noble, K. D. (1992). Acceleration: Valuable high school to college options. Gifted Child Today, 15(2), 20-23.
49.
Roland, S. P., Joswig, H., & Balogh, L. (2000). Gifted education in Europe: Programs, practices and current research. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 703-734.) New York: Elsevier.
50.
Sayler, M. F. (1994). Early college entrance: A viable option. In J. N. Hansen & S. M. Hoover (Eds.), Talent development: Theories and practice (pp. 67-79). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
51.
Sharkey, O. C. (1987). Tony Lai, age 14, B.Sc., prodigy. Roeper Review, 10, 94-96.
52.
Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. S. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
53.
Sisk, D. A. (1992). Reflections and impressions on education in China. Roeper Review, 14, 181-185.
54.
Southern, W. T., & Jones, E. D. (1992). The real problems with academic acceleration. Gifted Child Today, 15(2), 34-38.
55.
Southern, W. T., Jones, E. D., & Fiscus, E. D. (1989). Practitioner objections to the academic acceleration of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 29-35.
56.
Stanley, J. C. (1978a). Concern for intellectually talented youths: How it originated and fluctuated. In R. E. Clasen & B. Robinson (Eds.), Simple gifts. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
57.
Stanley, J. C. (1978b). Educational non-acceleration: An international tragedy. Gifted Child Today, 1(3), 2-5, 53-53.
58.
Stanley, J. C. (1978c). Radical acceleration: Recent educational innovation at JHU. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 62-67.
59.
Stanley, J. C. (1985). Young entrants to college: How did they fare?College and University, 58, 361-371.
60.
Stanley, J. C. (1991). Critique of “Socioemotional Adjustment of Adolescent Girls Enrolled in a Residential Acceleration Pprogram.”Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 67-70.
61.
Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1983). Extremely young college graduates: Evidence of their success. College and University, 58, 361-371.
62.
Stanley, J. C., Keating, D. P., & Fox, L. H. (Eds.). (1974). Mathematical talent: Discovery, description and development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
63.
Swiatek, M. A. (1993). A decade of longitudinal research on academic acceleration through the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth. Roeper Review, 15, 120-124.
64.
Swiatek, M. A., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). The yearly longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 528-538.
65.
Tao, B. (2003, August). From sprinter to marathon runner: Reflections on the education of Terry Tao from a family perspective. Paper presented at the 15th World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children, Adelaide, Australia.
66.
Terman, L. M. (1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children: Genetic studies of genius, Vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
67.
Terman, L. M. (1956). The Concept Mastery Test manual: Form T. New York: Psychological Corporation.
68.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). The gifted group at mid-life: Genetic studies of genius, Vol. 5. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
69.
Touron, J. (2001). School and College Ability Test (SCAT) validation in Spain: Overview of the process and some results. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 104-107.
70.
Vialle, W., Ashton, T., Carlon, G., & Rankin, F. (2001). Acceleration: A coat of many colours. Roeper Review, 24, 14-19.
71.
Wu, W. (1991). Current trends in gifted and talented education in Taiwan, R.O.C. Gifted and Talented International, 7, 85-94.
72.
Zhao, X. (1996). Reflections of a gifted program in China. Gifted and Talented International, 11, 80-83.
