This study is a slice of an overarching research investigation of perfectionism in gifted college students. Utilizing a qualitative interview design, this study examined how gifted college students scoring high on 1 of 2 different dimensions of perfectionism (socially prescribed or self-oriented) perceived their achievement motivation. Findings indicated that, for the socially prescribed perfectionists, an underlying motive to avoid failure influenced their achievement goals and behaviors. Based on this motive, they set both performance-avoidance and performance-approach goals and tended toward procrastination in their work. In contrast, an underlying motive to achieve influenced the achievement goals and behaviors of the self-oriented perfectionists. These participants set both mastery and performance approach goals. They developed a strong work ethic, and they were motivated to seek out challenges. Implications of these findings are suggested, and recommendations for parents and educators working with gifted perfectionistic students are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adkins, K. K., & Parker, W. D. (1996). Perfectionism and suicidal preoccupation. Journal of Personality, 64, 529-543.
2.
Ainley, M. D. (1993). Styles of engagement with learning: Multidimensional assessment of their relationship with strategy use and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 395-405.
3.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
5.
Butler, R. (1992). What young people want to know when: Effects of mastery and ability goals on interest in different kinds of social comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 934-943.
6.
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Covington, M. (1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications. The Elementary School Journal, 85, 5-20.
8.
Covington, M. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth prospective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Dai, D., Moon, S., & Feldhusen, J. (1998). Achievement motivation of gifted students. A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 45-63.
10.
Delisle, J. (1986). Death with honors: Suicide among gifted adolescents. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64, 558-560.
11.
Elliot, A. J. (1994). Approach and avoidance achievement goals: An intrinsic motivation analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
12.
Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 143-179). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
13.
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
14.
Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
15.
Elliot, A., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 968-980.
16.
Flett, G., Blankstein, K., Hewitt, P., & Koledin, S. (1992). Components of perfectionism and procrastination in college students. Social Behavior and Personality, 20, 85-94.
17.
Flett, G., Hewitt, P., & Martin, T. (1995). Dimensions of perfectionism and procrastination. In J. Ferrari, J. Johnson, & W. McCown (Eds.), Procrastination and task avoidance: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 113-136). New York: Plenum.
18.
Frost, R. P., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449-468.
19.
Hamilton, T., & Schweitzer, R. (2000). The cost of being perfect: Perfectionism and suicide ideation in university students. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34, 829-835.
20.
Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 456-470.
21.
Kline, B. E., & Short, E. B. (1991). Changes in emotional resilience: Gifted adolescent females. Roeper Review, 13, 118-121.
22.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
LoCicero, K. A., & Ashby, J. S. (2000). Multidimensional perfectionism in middle school aged gifted students: A comparison to peers from the general cohort. Roeper Review, 22, 182-185.
24.
Midgley, C., Arunkumar, R., & Urdan, T. (1996). “If I don't do well tomorrow, there's a reason”: Predictors of adolescents' use of academic self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.
25.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Mills, J. S., & Blankstein, K. R. (2000). Perfectionism, intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation, and motivated strategies for learning: A multidimensional analysis of university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1191-1204.
27.
Parker, W. (1997). An empirical typology of perfectionism in academically talented children. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 545-562.
28.
Parker, W., & Mills, C. J. (1996). The incidence of perfectionism in gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 194-199.
29.
Parker, W., & Stumpf, H. (1995). An examination of the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale with a sample of academically talented children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 372-383.
30.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Payne, S. (1999). Interviewing in qualitative research. In A. Memon & R. Bull (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of interviewing (pp. 89-102). New York: Wiley.
32.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 544-555.
33.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), The handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34.
Roberts, S. M., & Lovett, S. (1994). Examining “F” in gifted: Academically gifted adolescents' physiological and affective responses to scholastic failure. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 241-259.
35.
Schuler, P. A. (2000). Perfectionism in the gifted adolescent. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 183-196.
36.
Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993). Writing strategy instruction with gifted students: Effects of goals and feedback on self-efficacy and skills. Roeper Review, 15, 225-230.
37.
Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
38.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Ziegler, A., Heller, K., & Broome, P. (1996). Motivational preconditions for gifted girls and highly gifted girls in physics. High Ability Studies, 7, 129-143.
