Although the long-term impact of early entrance to college has been examined, one issue that has received inadequate attention in the gifted education literature is how students enrolled in early-entrance programs adjust during their first semester of college, which is arguably the most critical juncture for them in terms of their transition from high school. The purpose of this study was to identify the unique academic, social, family, and transition issues that challenged the inaugural class of the National Academy of Arts, Sciences, and Engineering (NAASE), an early-entrance program at the University of Iowa. Through the use of in-depth interviews, behavioral observations, and student and parent surveys, a rich picture of the students' satisfaction and challenges with their first-semester college experiences emerged. While the primary aim of this research was to examine the NAASE students' first-semester adjustment, the study also served to evaluate the effectiveness of the NAASE program from the students' perspectives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Walters, E., & Wally, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of strange situations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
Arthur, N., & Hayward, L. (1997). The relationship between perfectionism, standards for academic achievement, and emotional distress in postsecondary students. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 622-631.
3.
Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1997). Intellectually talented children: How can we best meet their needs? In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 155-169). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
4.
Berger, J. B. (1997). Students' sense of community in residence halls, social integration, and first-year persistence. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 441-452.
5.
Boothe, D., Sethna, B. N., Stanley, J. C., & Colgate, S. D. (1999). Special opportunities for exceptionally able high school students: A description of eight early-college-entrance programs. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 195-202.
6.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base. New York: BasicBooks.
7.
Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park: Sage.
8.
Brody, L. E., & Benbow, C. (1987). Accelerative strategies: How effective are they for the gifted?Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 105-110.
9.
Brooks, J. H., & DuBois, D. L. (1995). Individual and environmental predictors of adjustment during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 36, 347-360.
10.
Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E., & Hagedorn, L. S. (1999). Campus racial climate and the adjustment of students to college: A comparison between White students and African-American students. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 134-160.
11.
Coleman, M. S., & Colangelo, N. (1998) The National Academy of Arts, Sciences, and Engineering [Brochure]. Iowa City: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa.
12.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success & failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Gerdes, H., & Mallinckrodt, B. (1994). Emotional, social, and academic adjustment of college students: A longitudinal study of retention. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72, 281-288.
15.
Hoftyzer, R. (2001). Redeeming the time. Vision: News from The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, 9(2), 12-12.
16.
Holmbeck, G. N., & Wandrei, M. L. (1993). Individual and relational predictors of adjustment in first-year college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 73-78.
17.
Janos, P. M., Robinson, N. M., & Lunneborg, C. E. (1989). Markedly early entrance to college. Journal of Higher Education, 60, 495-518.
18.
Kenny, M. E., & Donaldson, G. A. (1991). Contribution of parental attachment and family structure to the social and psychological functioning of first-year college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 479-486.
19.
Kenny, M. E., & Donaldson, G. A. (1992). The relationship of parental attachment and psychological separation to the adjustment of first-year college women. Journal of College Student Development, 33, 431-438.
20.
Kenny, M. E., & Stryker, S. (1996). Social network characteristics and college adjustment among racially and ethnically diverse first-year students. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 649-658.
21.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Mathis, M., & Lecci, L. (1999). Hardiness and college adjustment: Identifying students in need of services. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 305-309.
24.
Mooney, S. P., Sherman, M. F., & LoPriesto, C. T. (1991). Academic locus of control, self-esteem, and perceived distance from home as predictors of college adjustment. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69, 445-448.
25.
Mucowski, R. J. (1984). Some common problems of new students and sources of help. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26, 550-550.
26.
Noble, K. D., Arndt, T., Nicholson, T., Sletten, T., & Zamora, A. (1999). Different strokes: Perceptions of social and emotional development among early college entrants. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 77-84.
27.
Noble, K. D., & Drummond, J. E. (1992). But what about the prom? Students' perceptions of early college entrance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 106-111.
28.
Noble, K. D., Robinson, N. M., & Gunderson, S. A. (1993). All rivers lead to the sea: A follow-up study of gifted young adults. Roeper Review, 15, 124-130.
29.
Noble, K. D., & Smyth, R. K. (1995). Keeping their talents alive: Young women's assessment of radical, post-secondary acceleration. Roeper Review, 18, 49-55.
30.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1995a). A summary of research regarding early entrance to college. Roeper Review, 18, 121-125.
31.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1995b). Thinking through early entrance. The American Association for Gifted Children Newsletter, 2(2), 1-5.
32.
Pascarella, E. T. (1985, July). The influence of on-campus living versus commuting to college on intellectual and interpersonal self-concept. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26(4) 292-299.
33.
Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research method (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Paul, E. L., Poole, A., & Jakubowyc, N. (1998). Intimacy development and romantic status: Implications for adjustment to the college transition. Journal of College Student Development, 39, 75-86.
36.
Peterson, J. S. (2000). Preparing for college—beyond the getting-in part. Gifted Child Today, 23(2), 36-41.
37.
Pflaum, S. W., Pascarella, E. T., & Duby, P. (1985, September). The effects of honors college participation on academic performance during the freshmen year. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26, 414-419.
38.
Rhodes, C. (1994). Modeling interdependence: Productive parenting for gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5, 19-26.
39.
Robbins, S. B., Lese, K. P., & Herrick, S. M. (1993). Interactions between goal instability and social support on college freshmen adjustment. Journal of Counseling & Development, 71, 343-347.
40.
Robinson, N. M., & Noble, K. D. (1992) Acceleration: Valuable high school to college options. Gifted Child Today, 15(2), 20-23.
41.
Rogers, K. B., & Kimpston, R. D. (1992) Acceleration: What we do vs. what we know. Educational Leadership, 50(2), 58-61.
42.
Schlossberg, N. K., Lynch, A. Q., & Chickering, A. W. (1989). Improving higher education environments for adults: Responsive programs and services from entry to departure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
Stanley, J. C. (1985a). Young entrants to college: How did they fare?College and University, 60, pp. 219-228.
44.
Stanley, J. C. (1985b). How did six highly accelerated gifted students fare in graduate school?Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 180-180.
45.
Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1983, Summer). Extremely young college graduates: Evidence of their success. College and University, 58(4), 361-369.
46.
Stanley, J. C., & McGill, A. M. (1986). More about “young entrants to college”: How did they fare?Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 70-73.
47.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89-125.
49.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1994). Middle school and acceleration: Guidance from research and the kids. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5(4), 42-51.
51.
Viadero, D. (2001). U.S. urged to rethink high school: Senior year is often dead end, panel says. Education Week, 20(19), 1-12.
